@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
"
BACKPORTS = "\
file://CVE-2016-6131.patch \
+ file://0057-ARM-PR-82445-suppress-32-bit-aligned-ldrd-strd-peeph.patch \
"
SRC_URI[md5sum] = "11ba51a0cfb8471927f387c8895fe232"
SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "850bf21eafdfe5cd5f6827148184c08c4a0852a37ccf36ce69855334d2c914d4"
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+From ad5bf450aef2ffee6d57ed193fabc5f72f8eaa65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: rearnsha <rearnsha@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
+Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:16:42 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] [ARM] PR 82445 - suppress 32-bit aligned ldrd/strd peepholing
+ with -mno-unaligned-access
+
+Peephole patterns exist in the arm backend to spot load/store
+operations to adjacent memory operations in order to convert them into
+ldrd/strd instructions. However, when we have strict alignment
+enforced, then we can only do this if the accesses are known to be
+64-bit aligned; this is unlikely to be the case for most loads. The
+patch adds some alignment checking to the code that validates the
+addresses for use in the peephole patterns. This should also fix
+incorrect generation of ldrd/strd with unaligned accesses that could
+previously have occurred on ARMv5e where all such operations must be
+64-bit aligned.
+
+I've added some new tests as well. In doing so I discovered that the
+ldrd/strd peephole tests could never fail since they would match the
+source file name in the scanned assembly as well as any instructions
+of the intended type. I've fixed those by tightening the scan results
+slightly.
+
+gcc:
+
+* config/arm/arm.c (align_ok_ldrd_strd): New function.
+(mem_ok_for_ldrd_strd): New parameter align. Extract the alignment of the
+mem into it.
+(gen_operands_ldrd_strd): Validate the alignment of the accesses.
+
+testsuite:
+
+* gcc.target/arm/peep-ldrd-1.c: Tighten test scan pattern.
+* gcc.target/arm/peep-strd-1.c: Likewise.
+* gcc.target/arm/peep-ldrd-2.c: New test.
+* gcc.target/arm/peep-strd-2.c: New test.
+
+
+
+git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6-branch@253892 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
+---
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
+
+ gcc/ChangeLog | 8 +++++++
+ gcc/config/arm/arm.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++----
+ gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 8 +++++++
+ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-ldrd-1.c | 2 +-
+ .../arm/{peep-ldrd-1.c => peep-ldrd-2.c} | 4 ++--
+ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-strd-1.c | 2 +-
+ .../arm/{peep-strd-1.c => peep-strd-2.c} | 4 ++--
+ 7 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
+ copy gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/{peep-ldrd-1.c => peep-ldrd-2.c} (63%)
+ copy gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/{peep-strd-1.c => peep-strd-2.c} (58%)
+
+diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
+index 9c0813d598d..e3da9f77fb6 100644
+--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
++++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
+@@ -15926,12 +15926,23 @@ operands_ok_ldrd_strd (rtx rt, rtx rt2, rtx rn, HOST_WIDE_INT offset,
+ return true;
+ }
+
++/* Return true if a 64-bit access with alignment ALIGN and with a
++ constant offset OFFSET from the base pointer is permitted on this
++ architecture. */
++static bool
++align_ok_ldrd_strd (HOST_WIDE_INT align, HOST_WIDE_INT offset)
++{
++ return (unaligned_access
++ ? (align >= BITS_PER_WORD && (offset & 3) == 0)
++ : (align >= 2 * BITS_PER_WORD && (offset & 7) == 0));
++}
++
+ /* Helper for gen_operands_ldrd_strd. Returns true iff the memory
+ operand MEM's address contains an immediate offset from the base
+- register and has no side effects, in which case it sets BASE and
+- OFFSET accordingly. */
++ register and has no side effects, in which case it sets BASE,
++ OFFSET and ALIGN accordingly. */
+ static bool
+-mem_ok_for_ldrd_strd (rtx mem, rtx *base, rtx *offset)
++mem_ok_for_ldrd_strd (rtx mem, rtx *base, rtx *offset, HOST_WIDE_INT *align)
+ {
+ rtx addr;
+
+@@ -15950,6 +15961,7 @@ mem_ok_for_ldrd_strd (rtx mem, rtx *base, rtx *offset)
+ gcc_assert (MEM_P (mem));
+
+ *offset = const0_rtx;
++ *align = MEM_ALIGN (mem);
+
+ addr = XEXP (mem, 0);
+
+@@ -15990,7 +16002,7 @@ gen_operands_ldrd_strd (rtx *operands, bool load,
+ bool const_store, bool commute)
+ {
+ int nops = 2;
+- HOST_WIDE_INT offsets[2], offset;
++ HOST_WIDE_INT offsets[2], offset, align[2];
+ rtx base = NULL_RTX;
+ rtx cur_base, cur_offset, tmp;
+ int i, gap;
+@@ -16002,7 +16014,8 @@ gen_operands_ldrd_strd (rtx *operands, bool load,
+ registers, and the corresponding memory offsets. */
+ for (i = 0; i < nops; i++)
+ {
+- if (!mem_ok_for_ldrd_strd (operands[nops+i], &cur_base, &cur_offset))
++ if (!mem_ok_for_ldrd_strd (operands[nops+i], &cur_base, &cur_offset,
++ &align[i]))
+ return false;
+
+ if (i == 0)
+@@ -16114,6 +16127,7 @@ gen_operands_ldrd_strd (rtx *operands, bool load,
+ /* Swap the instructions such that lower memory is accessed first. */
+ std::swap (operands[0], operands[1]);
+ std::swap (operands[2], operands[3]);
++ std::swap (align[0], align[1]);
+ if (const_store)
+ std::swap (operands[4], operands[5]);
+ }
+@@ -16127,6 +16141,9 @@ gen_operands_ldrd_strd (rtx *operands, bool load,
+ if (gap != 4)
+ return false;
+
++ if (!align_ok_ldrd_strd (align[0], offset))
++ return false;
++
+ /* Make sure we generate legal instructions. */
+ if (operands_ok_ldrd_strd (operands[0], operands[1], base, offset,
+ false, load))
+diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-ldrd-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-ldrd-1.c
+index eb2b86ee7b6..d49eff6b87e 100644
+--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-ldrd-1.c
++++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-ldrd-1.c
+@@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ int foo(int a, int b, int* p, int *q)
+ *p = a;
+ return a;
+ }
+-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "ldrd" } } */
++/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "ldrd\\t" } } */
+diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-ldrd-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-ldrd-2.c
+similarity index 63%
+copy from gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-ldrd-1.c
+copy to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-ldrd-2.c
+index eb2b86ee7b6..6822c2b1454 100644
+--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-ldrd-1.c
++++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-ldrd-2.c
+@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
+ /* { dg-do compile } */
+ /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_prefer_ldrd_strd } */
+-/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
++/* { dg-options "-O2 -mno-unaligned-access" } */
+ int foo(int a, int b, int* p, int *q)
+ {
+ a = p[2] + p[3];
+@@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ int foo(int a, int b, int* p, int *q)
+ *p = a;
+ return a;
+ }
+-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "ldrd" } } */
++/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "ldrd\\t" } } */
+diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-strd-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-strd-1.c
+index bd330769599..fe1beac7229 100644
+--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-strd-1.c
++++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-strd-1.c
+@@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ void foo(int a, int b, int* p)
+ p[2] = a;
+ p[3] = b;
+ }
+-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "strd" } } */
++/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "strd\\t" } } */
+diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-strd-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-strd-2.c
+similarity index 58%
+copy from gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-strd-1.c
+copy to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-strd-2.c
+index bd330769599..bfc5ebe9eec 100644
+--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-strd-1.c
++++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/peep-strd-2.c
+@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
+ /* { dg-do compile } */
+ /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_prefer_ldrd_strd } */
+-/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
++/* { dg-options "-O2 -mno-unaligned-access" } */
+ void foo(int a, int b, int* p)
+ {
+ p[2] = a;
+ p[3] = b;
+ }
+-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "strd" } } */
++/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "strd\\t" } } */
+--
+2.15.0
+