Message ID | 1520697119-17483-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3] kconfig: make unmet dependency warnings readable | expand |
Hi Masahiro, Some "final polishing" review comments. Feel free to pick/drop them at your will. On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 12:51:59AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Currently, the unmet dependency warnings end up with endlessly long > expressions, most of which are false positives. > > Here is test code to demonstrate how it currently works. > > [Test Case] > > config DEP1 > def_bool y > > config DEP2 > bool "DEP2" > > config A > bool "A" > select E > > config B > bool "B" > depends on DEP2 > select E > > config C > bool "C" > depends on DEP1 && DEP2 > select E > > config D > def_bool n > select E > > config E > bool > depends on DEP1 && DEP2 > > [Result] > > $ make config > scripts/kconfig/conf --oldaskconfig Kconfig > * > * Linux Kernel Configuration > * > DEP2 (DEP2) [N/y/?] (NEW) n > A (A) [N/y/?] (NEW) y > warning: (A && B && D) selects E which has unmet direct > dependencies (DEP1 && DEP2) > > Here, I see some points to be improved. > > First, '(A || B || D)' would make more sense than '(A && B && D)'. > I am not sure if this is intentional, but expr_simplify_unmet_dep() > turns OR expressions into AND, like follows: > > case E_OR: > return expr_alloc_and( > > Second, we see false positives. 'A' is a real unmet dependency. > 'B' is false positive because 'DEP1' is fixed to 'y', and 'B' depends > on 'DEP2'. 'C' was correctly dropped by expr_simplify_unmet_dep(). > 'D' is also false positive because it has no chance to be enabled. > Current expr_simplify_unmet_dep() cannot avoid those false positives. > > After all, I decided to use the same helpers as used for printing > reverse dependencies in the help. > > With this commit, unreadable warnings in the real world: > > $ make ARCH=score allyesconfig > scripts/kconfig/conf --allyesconfig Kconfig > warning: (HWSPINLOCK_QCOM && AHCI_MTK && STMMAC_PLATFORM && DWMAC_IPQ806X > && DWMAC_LPC18XX && DWMAC_OXNAS && DWMAC_ROCKCHIP && DWMAC_SOCFPGA && DWMA > C_STI && TI_CPSW && PINCTRL_GEMINI && PINCTRL_OXNAS && PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP && > PINCTRL_DOVE && PINCTRL_ARMADA_37XX && PINCTRL_STM32 && S3C2410_WATCHDOG > && VIDEO_OMAP3 && VIDEO_S5P_FIMC && USB_XHCI_MTK && RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9 && LP > C18XX_DMAMUX && VIDEO_OMAP4 && COMMON_CLK_GEMINI && COMMON_CLK_ASPEED && C > OMMON_CLK_NXP && COMMON_CLK_OXNAS && COMMON_CLK_BOSTON && ATMEL_ST && QCOM > _ADSP_PIL && QCOM_Q6V5_PIL && QCOM_GSBI && ATMEL_EBI && ST_IRQCHIP && RESE > T_IMX7 && PHY_HI6220_USB && PHY_RALINK_USB && PHY_ROCKCHIP_PCIE && PHY_DA8 > XX_USB) selects MFD_SYSCON which has unmet direct dependencies (HAS_IOMEM) > warning: (PINCTRL_AT91 && PINCTRL_AT91PIO4 && PINCTRL_OXNAS && PINCTRL_PIS > TACHIO && PINCTRL_PIC32 && PINCTRL_MESON && PINCTRL_NOMADIK && PINCTRL_MTK > && PINCTRL_MT7622 && GPIO_TB10X) selects OF_GPIO which has unmet direct d > ependencies (GPIOLIB && OF && HAS_IOMEM) > warning: (FAULT_INJECTION_STACKTRACE_FILTER && LATENCYTOP && LOCKDEP) sele > cts FRAME_POINTER which has unmet direct dependencies (DEBUG_KERNEL && (CR > IS || M68K || FRV || UML || SUPERH || BLACKFIN || MN10300 || METAG) || ARC > H_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS) > > will be turned into: > > $ make ARCH=score allyesconfig > scripts/kconfig/conf --allyesconfig Kconfig > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for MFD_SYSCON > Depends on: Here imho `Depends on [n]:` is more inline with the "Selected by [y|m]" family, but this could be subjective. `[n]` might be helpful for long direct dependencies, like seen below for FRAME_POINTER. No strong preference about it. > HAS_IOMEM [=n] Adding a minus in front of expression, i.e. ` - HAS_IOMEM [=n]` is probably more inline with how reverse dependencies are printed. > Selected by [y]: Shifting this line to the right by one space symbol would resemble the `make menuconfig` output. No strong preference about it. > - PINCTRL_STM32 [=y] && PINCTRL [=y] && (ARCH_STM32 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) > && OF [=y] > - RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9 [=y] && RTC_CLASS [=y] && (ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST > [=y]) > - ATMEL_ST [=y] && GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS [=y] > - RESET_IMX7 [=y] && RESET_CONTROLLER [=y] > - PHY_HI6220_USB [=y] && (ARCH_HISI && ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) > - PHY_RALINK_USB [=y] && (RALINK || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) > - PHY_ROCKCHIP_PCIE [=y] && (ARCH_ROCKCHIP && OF [=y] || COMPILE_TEST > [=y]) > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for OF_GPIO > Depends on: Likewise, shifting the above line to the right by one space would make it similar to what's generated by `make menuconfig`. > GPIOLIB [=y] && OF [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=n] > Selected by [y]: > - PINCTRL_MTK [=y] && PINCTRL [=y] && (ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST > [=y]) && OF [=y] > - PINCTRL_MT7622 [=y] && PINCTRL [=y] && (ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST > [=y]) && OF [=y] && (ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for FRAME_POINTER > Depends on: > DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && (CRIS || M68K || FRV || UML || SUPERH || BLACKFIN > || MN10300 || METAG) || ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS [=n] > Selected by [y]: > - LATENCYTOP [=y] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT [=y] && > PROC_FS [=y] && !MIPS && !PPC && !S390 && !MICROBLAZE && !ARM_UNWIND && > !ARC && !X86 > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com> > --- > > Changes in v3: > - Remove unused expr_get_leftmost_symbol() > - Move error message to the same line as 'WARNING' > - update test case > > Changes in v2: > - update test case > > scripts/kconfig/expr.c | 42 ------------------------------------------ > scripts/kconfig/expr.h | 1 - > scripts/kconfig/symbol.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/expr.c b/scripts/kconfig/expr.c > index 49376e1..e1a39e9 100644 > --- a/scripts/kconfig/expr.c > +++ b/scripts/kconfig/expr.c > @@ -1137,48 +1137,6 @@ static int expr_compare_type(enum expr_type t1, enum expr_type t2) > return 0; > } > > -static inline struct expr * > -expr_get_leftmost_symbol(const struct expr *e) > -{ > - > - if (e == NULL) > - return NULL; > - > - while (e->type != E_SYMBOL) > - e = e->left.expr; > - > - return expr_copy(e); > -} > - > -/* > - * Given expression `e1' and `e2', returns the leaf of the longest > - * sub-expression of `e1' not containing 'e2. > - */ > -struct expr *expr_simplify_unmet_dep(struct expr *e1, struct expr *e2) > -{ > - struct expr *ret; > - > - switch (e1->type) { > - case E_OR: > - return expr_alloc_and( > - expr_simplify_unmet_dep(e1->left.expr, e2), > - expr_simplify_unmet_dep(e1->right.expr, e2)); > - case E_AND: { > - struct expr *e; > - e = expr_alloc_and(expr_copy(e1), expr_copy(e2)); > - e = expr_eliminate_dups(e); > - ret = (!expr_eq(e, e1)) ? e1 : NULL; > - expr_free(e); > - break; > - } > - default: > - ret = e1; > - break; > - } > - > - return expr_get_leftmost_symbol(ret); > -} > - > void expr_print(struct expr *e, > void (*fn)(void *, struct symbol *, const char *), > void *data, int prevtoken) > diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/expr.h b/scripts/kconfig/expr.h > index 8dbf2a4..94a383b 100644 > --- a/scripts/kconfig/expr.h > +++ b/scripts/kconfig/expr.h > @@ -305,7 +305,6 @@ struct expr *expr_transform(struct expr *e); > int expr_contains_symbol(struct expr *dep, struct symbol *sym); > bool expr_depends_symbol(struct expr *dep, struct symbol *sym); > struct expr *expr_trans_compare(struct expr *e, enum expr_type type, struct symbol *sym); > -struct expr *expr_simplify_unmet_dep(struct expr *e1, struct expr *e2); > > void expr_fprint(struct expr *e, FILE *out); > struct gstr; /* forward */ > diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c b/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c > index 0f7eba7..8b13c16 100644 > --- a/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c > +++ b/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c > @@ -333,6 +333,26 @@ static struct symbol *sym_calc_choice(struct symbol *sym) > return def_sym; > } > > +static void sym_warn_unmet_dependency(struct symbol *sym) Based on the current naming pattern of kconfig functions: $> ctags -x --c-types=f scripts/kconfig/*.c | cut -d' ' -f1 | grep dep dep_stack_insert dep_stack_remove expr_depends_symbol expr_gstr_print_revdep expr_simplify_unmet_dep file_write_dep menu_add_dep sym_check_choice_deps sym_check_deps sym_check_expr_deps sym_check_sym_deps You could also consider below variants: * sym_warn_unmet_dep() * sym_warn_unmet_deps() * sym_warn_unmet_dirdep() > +{ > + struct gstr gs = str_new(); > + > + str_printf(&gs, > + "\nWARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for %s\n" > + " Depends on:\n" > + " ", > + sym->name); > + expr_gstr_print(sym->dir_dep.expr, &gs); > + str_printf(&gs, "\n"); > + > + expr_gstr_print_revdep(sym->rev_dep.expr, &gs, yes, > + " Selected by [y]:\n"); > + expr_gstr_print_revdep(sym->rev_dep.expr, &gs, mod, > + " Selected by [m]:\n"); > + > + fputs(str_get(&gs), stderr); > +} > + > void sym_calc_value(struct symbol *sym) > { > struct symbol_value newval, oldval; > @@ -414,18 +434,8 @@ void sym_calc_value(struct symbol *sym) > } > } > calc_newval: > - if (sym->dir_dep.tri == no && sym->rev_dep.tri != no) { > - struct expr *e; > - e = expr_simplify_unmet_dep(sym->rev_dep.expr, > - sym->dir_dep.expr); > - fprintf(stderr, "warning: ("); > - expr_fprint(e, stderr); > - fprintf(stderr, ") selects %s which has unmet direct dependencies (", > - sym->name); > - expr_fprint(sym->dir_dep.expr, stderr); > - fprintf(stderr, ")\n"); > - expr_free(e); > - } > + if (sym->dir_dep.tri == no && sym->rev_dep.tri != no) > + sym_warn_unmet_dependency(sym); > newval.tri = EXPR_OR(newval.tri, sym->rev_dep.tri); > } > if (newval.tri == mod && > -- > 2.7.4 > Best regards, Eugeniu.
2018-03-13 7:59 GMT+09:00 Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>: > Hi Masahiro, > > Some "final polishing" review comments. Feel free to pick/drop them at > your will. > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 12:51:59AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> Currently, the unmet dependency warnings end up with endlessly long >> expressions, most of which are false positives. >> >> Here is test code to demonstrate how it currently works. >> >> [Test Case] >> >> config DEP1 >> def_bool y >> >> config DEP2 >> bool "DEP2" >> >> config A >> bool "A" >> select E >> >> config B >> bool "B" >> depends on DEP2 >> select E >> >> config C >> bool "C" >> depends on DEP1 && DEP2 >> select E >> >> config D >> def_bool n >> select E >> >> config E >> bool >> depends on DEP1 && DEP2 >> >> [Result] >> >> $ make config >> scripts/kconfig/conf --oldaskconfig Kconfig >> * >> * Linux Kernel Configuration >> * >> DEP2 (DEP2) [N/y/?] (NEW) n >> A (A) [N/y/?] (NEW) y >> warning: (A && B && D) selects E which has unmet direct >> dependencies (DEP1 && DEP2) >> >> Here, I see some points to be improved. >> >> First, '(A || B || D)' would make more sense than '(A && B && D)'. >> I am not sure if this is intentional, but expr_simplify_unmet_dep() >> turns OR expressions into AND, like follows: >> >> case E_OR: >> return expr_alloc_and( >> >> Second, we see false positives. 'A' is a real unmet dependency. >> 'B' is false positive because 'DEP1' is fixed to 'y', and 'B' depends >> on 'DEP2'. 'C' was correctly dropped by expr_simplify_unmet_dep(). >> 'D' is also false positive because it has no chance to be enabled. >> Current expr_simplify_unmet_dep() cannot avoid those false positives. >> >> After all, I decided to use the same helpers as used for printing >> reverse dependencies in the help. >> >> With this commit, unreadable warnings in the real world: >> >> $ make ARCH=score allyesconfig >> scripts/kconfig/conf --allyesconfig Kconfig >> warning: (HWSPINLOCK_QCOM && AHCI_MTK && STMMAC_PLATFORM && DWMAC_IPQ806X >> && DWMAC_LPC18XX && DWMAC_OXNAS && DWMAC_ROCKCHIP && DWMAC_SOCFPGA && DWMA >> C_STI && TI_CPSW && PINCTRL_GEMINI && PINCTRL_OXNAS && PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP && >> PINCTRL_DOVE && PINCTRL_ARMADA_37XX && PINCTRL_STM32 && S3C2410_WATCHDOG >> && VIDEO_OMAP3 && VIDEO_S5P_FIMC && USB_XHCI_MTK && RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9 && LP >> C18XX_DMAMUX && VIDEO_OMAP4 && COMMON_CLK_GEMINI && COMMON_CLK_ASPEED && C >> OMMON_CLK_NXP && COMMON_CLK_OXNAS && COMMON_CLK_BOSTON && ATMEL_ST && QCOM >> _ADSP_PIL && QCOM_Q6V5_PIL && QCOM_GSBI && ATMEL_EBI && ST_IRQCHIP && RESE >> T_IMX7 && PHY_HI6220_USB && PHY_RALINK_USB && PHY_ROCKCHIP_PCIE && PHY_DA8 >> XX_USB) selects MFD_SYSCON which has unmet direct dependencies (HAS_IOMEM) >> warning: (PINCTRL_AT91 && PINCTRL_AT91PIO4 && PINCTRL_OXNAS && PINCTRL_PIS >> TACHIO && PINCTRL_PIC32 && PINCTRL_MESON && PINCTRL_NOMADIK && PINCTRL_MTK >> && PINCTRL_MT7622 && GPIO_TB10X) selects OF_GPIO which has unmet direct d >> ependencies (GPIOLIB && OF && HAS_IOMEM) >> warning: (FAULT_INJECTION_STACKTRACE_FILTER && LATENCYTOP && LOCKDEP) sele >> cts FRAME_POINTER which has unmet direct dependencies (DEBUG_KERNEL && (CR >> IS || M68K || FRV || UML || SUPERH || BLACKFIN || MN10300 || METAG) || ARC >> H_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS) >> >> will be turned into: >> >> $ make ARCH=score allyesconfig >> scripts/kconfig/conf --allyesconfig Kconfig >> >> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for MFD_SYSCON >> Depends on: > > Here imho `Depends on [n]:` is more inline with the "Selected by [y|m]" > family, but this could be subjective. `[n]` might be helpful for long > direct dependencies, like seen below for FRAME_POINTER. No strong > preference about it. I did so. I took into consideration 'Depends on [m]' case too. I inserted another patch before this. >> HAS_IOMEM [=n] > > Adding a minus in front of expression, i.e. ` - HAS_IOMEM [=n]` > is probably more inline with how reverse dependencies are printed. I did not take this. The expression for 'depends on' is not so long, so we expect a single line for this. Itemization is generally used when we expect multiple lines, IMHO. >> Selected by [y]: > > Shifting this line to the right by one space symbol would resemble the > `make menuconfig` output. No strong preference about it. I did so. >> - PINCTRL_STM32 [=y] && PINCTRL [=y] && (ARCH_STM32 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) >> && OF [=y] >> - RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9 [=y] && RTC_CLASS [=y] && (ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST >> [=y]) >> - ATMEL_ST [=y] && GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS [=y] >> - RESET_IMX7 [=y] && RESET_CONTROLLER [=y] >> - PHY_HI6220_USB [=y] && (ARCH_HISI && ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) >> - PHY_RALINK_USB [=y] && (RALINK || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) >> - PHY_ROCKCHIP_PCIE [=y] && (ARCH_ROCKCHIP && OF [=y] || COMPILE_TEST >> [=y]) >> >> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for OF_GPIO >> Depends on: > > Likewise, shifting the above line to the right by one space would make > it similar to what's generated by `make menuconfig`. I did so. >> GPIOLIB [=y] && OF [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=n] >> Selected by [y]: >> - PINCTRL_MTK [=y] && PINCTRL [=y] && (ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST >> [=y]) && OF [=y] >> - PINCTRL_MT7622 [=y] && PINCTRL [=y] && (ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST >> [=y]) && OF [=y] && (ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) >> >> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for FRAME_POINTER >> Depends on: >> DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && (CRIS || M68K || FRV || UML || SUPERH || BLACKFIN >> || MN10300 || METAG) || ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS [=n] >> Selected by [y]: >> - LATENCYTOP [=y] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT [=y] && >> PROC_FS [=y] && !MIPS && !PPC && !S390 && !MICROBLAZE && !ARM_UNWIND && >> !ARC && !X86 >> >> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> >> Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com> >> --- >> >> Changes in v3: >> - Remove unused expr_get_leftmost_symbol() >> - Move error message to the same line as 'WARNING' >> - update test case >> >> Changes in v2: >> - update test case >> >> scripts/kconfig/expr.c | 42 ------------------------------------------ >> scripts/kconfig/expr.h | 1 - >> scripts/kconfig/symbol.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/expr.c b/scripts/kconfig/expr.c >> index 49376e1..e1a39e9 100644 >> --- a/scripts/kconfig/expr.c >> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/expr.c >> @@ -1137,48 +1137,6 @@ static int expr_compare_type(enum expr_type t1, enum expr_type t2) >> return 0; >> } >> >> -static inline struct expr * >> -expr_get_leftmost_symbol(const struct expr *e) >> -{ >> - >> - if (e == NULL) >> - return NULL; >> - >> - while (e->type != E_SYMBOL) >> - e = e->left.expr; >> - >> - return expr_copy(e); >> -} >> - >> -/* >> - * Given expression `e1' and `e2', returns the leaf of the longest >> - * sub-expression of `e1' not containing 'e2. >> - */ >> -struct expr *expr_simplify_unmet_dep(struct expr *e1, struct expr *e2) >> -{ >> - struct expr *ret; >> - >> - switch (e1->type) { >> - case E_OR: >> - return expr_alloc_and( >> - expr_simplify_unmet_dep(e1->left.expr, e2), >> - expr_simplify_unmet_dep(e1->right.expr, e2)); >> - case E_AND: { >> - struct expr *e; >> - e = expr_alloc_and(expr_copy(e1), expr_copy(e2)); >> - e = expr_eliminate_dups(e); >> - ret = (!expr_eq(e, e1)) ? e1 : NULL; >> - expr_free(e); >> - break; >> - } >> - default: >> - ret = e1; >> - break; >> - } >> - >> - return expr_get_leftmost_symbol(ret); >> -} >> - >> void expr_print(struct expr *e, >> void (*fn)(void *, struct symbol *, const char *), >> void *data, int prevtoken) >> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/expr.h b/scripts/kconfig/expr.h >> index 8dbf2a4..94a383b 100644 >> --- a/scripts/kconfig/expr.h >> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/expr.h >> @@ -305,7 +305,6 @@ struct expr *expr_transform(struct expr *e); >> int expr_contains_symbol(struct expr *dep, struct symbol *sym); >> bool expr_depends_symbol(struct expr *dep, struct symbol *sym); >> struct expr *expr_trans_compare(struct expr *e, enum expr_type type, struct symbol *sym); >> -struct expr *expr_simplify_unmet_dep(struct expr *e1, struct expr *e2); >> >> void expr_fprint(struct expr *e, FILE *out); >> struct gstr; /* forward */ >> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c b/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c >> index 0f7eba7..8b13c16 100644 >> --- a/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c >> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c >> @@ -333,6 +333,26 @@ static struct symbol *sym_calc_choice(struct symbol *sym) >> return def_sym; >> } >> >> +static void sym_warn_unmet_dependency(struct symbol *sym) > > Based on the current naming pattern of kconfig functions: > > $> ctags -x --c-types=f scripts/kconfig/*.c | cut -d' ' -f1 | grep dep > dep_stack_insert > dep_stack_remove > expr_depends_symbol > expr_gstr_print_revdep > expr_simplify_unmet_dep > file_write_dep > menu_add_dep > sym_check_choice_deps > sym_check_deps > sym_check_expr_deps > sym_check_sym_deps > > You could also consider below variants: > * sym_warn_unmet_dep() > * sym_warn_unmet_deps() > * sym_warn_unmet_dirdep() I chose sym_warn_unmet_dep(). Thanks! >> +{ >> + struct gstr gs = str_new(); >> + >> + str_printf(&gs, >> + "\nWARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for %s\n" >> + " Depends on:\n" >> + " ", >> + sym->name); >> + expr_gstr_print(sym->dir_dep.expr, &gs); >> + str_printf(&gs, "\n"); >> + >> + expr_gstr_print_revdep(sym->rev_dep.expr, &gs, yes, >> + " Selected by [y]:\n"); >> + expr_gstr_print_revdep(sym->rev_dep.expr, &gs, mod, >> + " Selected by [m]:\n"); >> + >> + fputs(str_get(&gs), stderr); >> +} >> + >> void sym_calc_value(struct symbol *sym) >> { >> struct symbol_value newval, oldval; >> @@ -414,18 +434,8 @@ void sym_calc_value(struct symbol *sym) >> } >> } >> calc_newval: >> - if (sym->dir_dep.tri == no && sym->rev_dep.tri != no) { >> - struct expr *e; >> - e = expr_simplify_unmet_dep(sym->rev_dep.expr, >> - sym->dir_dep.expr); >> - fprintf(stderr, "warning: ("); >> - expr_fprint(e, stderr); >> - fprintf(stderr, ") selects %s which has unmet direct dependencies (", >> - sym->name); >> - expr_fprint(sym->dir_dep.expr, stderr); >> - fprintf(stderr, ")\n"); >> - expr_free(e); >> - } >> + if (sym->dir_dep.tri == no && sym->rev_dep.tri != no) >> + sym_warn_unmet_dependency(sym); >> newval.tri = EXPR_OR(newval.tri, sym->rev_dep.tri); >> } >> if (newval.tri == mod && >> -- >> 2.7.4 >> > > Best regards, > Eugeniu. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/expr.c b/scripts/kconfig/expr.c index 49376e1..e1a39e9 100644 --- a/scripts/kconfig/expr.c +++ b/scripts/kconfig/expr.c @@ -1137,48 +1137,6 @@ static int expr_compare_type(enum expr_type t1, enum expr_type t2) return 0; } -static inline struct expr * -expr_get_leftmost_symbol(const struct expr *e) -{ - - if (e == NULL) - return NULL; - - while (e->type != E_SYMBOL) - e = e->left.expr; - - return expr_copy(e); -} - -/* - * Given expression `e1' and `e2', returns the leaf of the longest - * sub-expression of `e1' not containing 'e2. - */ -struct expr *expr_simplify_unmet_dep(struct expr *e1, struct expr *e2) -{ - struct expr *ret; - - switch (e1->type) { - case E_OR: - return expr_alloc_and( - expr_simplify_unmet_dep(e1->left.expr, e2), - expr_simplify_unmet_dep(e1->right.expr, e2)); - case E_AND: { - struct expr *e; - e = expr_alloc_and(expr_copy(e1), expr_copy(e2)); - e = expr_eliminate_dups(e); - ret = (!expr_eq(e, e1)) ? e1 : NULL; - expr_free(e); - break; - } - default: - ret = e1; - break; - } - - return expr_get_leftmost_symbol(ret); -} - void expr_print(struct expr *e, void (*fn)(void *, struct symbol *, const char *), void *data, int prevtoken) diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/expr.h b/scripts/kconfig/expr.h index 8dbf2a4..94a383b 100644 --- a/scripts/kconfig/expr.h +++ b/scripts/kconfig/expr.h @@ -305,7 +305,6 @@ struct expr *expr_transform(struct expr *e); int expr_contains_symbol(struct expr *dep, struct symbol *sym); bool expr_depends_symbol(struct expr *dep, struct symbol *sym); struct expr *expr_trans_compare(struct expr *e, enum expr_type type, struct symbol *sym); -struct expr *expr_simplify_unmet_dep(struct expr *e1, struct expr *e2); void expr_fprint(struct expr *e, FILE *out); struct gstr; /* forward */ diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c b/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c index 0f7eba7..8b13c16 100644 --- a/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c +++ b/scripts/kconfig/symbol.c @@ -333,6 +333,26 @@ static struct symbol *sym_calc_choice(struct symbol *sym) return def_sym; } +static void sym_warn_unmet_dependency(struct symbol *sym) +{ + struct gstr gs = str_new(); + + str_printf(&gs, + "\nWARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for %s\n" + " Depends on:\n" + " ", + sym->name); + expr_gstr_print(sym->dir_dep.expr, &gs); + str_printf(&gs, "\n"); + + expr_gstr_print_revdep(sym->rev_dep.expr, &gs, yes, + " Selected by [y]:\n"); + expr_gstr_print_revdep(sym->rev_dep.expr, &gs, mod, + " Selected by [m]:\n"); + + fputs(str_get(&gs), stderr); +} + void sym_calc_value(struct symbol *sym) { struct symbol_value newval, oldval; @@ -414,18 +434,8 @@ void sym_calc_value(struct symbol *sym) } } calc_newval: - if (sym->dir_dep.tri == no && sym->rev_dep.tri != no) { - struct expr *e; - e = expr_simplify_unmet_dep(sym->rev_dep.expr, - sym->dir_dep.expr); - fprintf(stderr, "warning: ("); - expr_fprint(e, stderr); - fprintf(stderr, ") selects %s which has unmet direct dependencies (", - sym->name); - expr_fprint(sym->dir_dep.expr, stderr); - fprintf(stderr, ")\n"); - expr_free(e); - } + if (sym->dir_dep.tri == no && sym->rev_dep.tri != no) + sym_warn_unmet_dependency(sym); newval.tri = EXPR_OR(newval.tri, sym->rev_dep.tri); } if (newval.tri == mod &&