@@ -1209,7 +1209,6 @@ int tmio_mmc_host_probe(struct tmio_mmc_host *_host)
struct tmio_mmc_data *pdata = _host->pdata;
struct mmc_host *mmc = _host->mmc;
int ret;
- u32 irq_mask = TMIO_MASK_CMD;
/*
* Check the sanity of mmc->f_min to prevent tmio_mmc_set_clock() from
@@ -1291,8 +1290,6 @@ int tmio_mmc_host_probe(struct tmio_mmc_host *_host)
_host->sdcard_irq_mask = sd_ctrl_read16_and_16_as_32(_host, CTL_IRQ_MASK);
tmio_mmc_disable_mmc_irqs(_host, TMIO_MASK_ALL);
- _host->sdcard_irq_mask &= ~irq_mask;
-
if (_host->native_hotplug)
tmio_mmc_enable_mmc_irqs(_host,
TMIO_STAT_CARD_REMOVE | TMIO_STAT_CARD_INSERT);
TMIO_MASK_CMD is properly enabled in tmio_mmc_start_command(). We have no reason to set it up in tmio_mmc_host_probe(). (If we really wanted to set it in the probe, we would have to do likewise when resuming.) Even worse, the following code is extremely confusing: _host->sdcard_irq_mask &= ~irq_mask; The logic is opposite between "->sdcard_irq_mask" and "irq_mask". The intention is not clear at a glance. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - Newly added drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_core.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4