| Message ID | 20171208133132.17099-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | i2c/ARM: davinci: Deep refactoring of I2C recovery | expand |
On Friday 08 December 2017 07:01 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > Alter the DaVinci GPIO recovery fetch to use descriptors > all the way down into the board files. > > Cc: arm@kernel.org > Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> > Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > --- > It turns out someone else was busy doing the same thing I was > doing. Trying to carry over the useful part with this patch! > A Tested-by or ACK from a DaVinci maintainer would be > appreciated, also an ACK from and ARM SoC maintainer. > The patch can be easily tested by applying on top of > linux-next. This patch causes I2C probe failure on DM6446 EVM. > --- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-evm.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c | 21 +++++++++++---------- > include/linux/platform_data/i2c-davinci.h | 5 ++--- > 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-evm.c > index 62e7bc3018f0..60aec5437276 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-evm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-evm.c > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h> > #include <linux/i2c.h> > #include <linux/gpio.h> > +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h> > #include <linux/clk.h> > #include <linux/videodev2.h> > #include <media/i2c/tvp514x.h> > @@ -108,11 +109,20 @@ static struct platform_device davinci_nand_device = { > }, > }; > > +static struct gpiod_lookup_table i2c_recovery_gpiod_table = { > + .dev_id = "i2c_davinci", > + .table = { > + GPIO_LOOKUP("davinci_gpio.0", 15, "sda", This should just be "davinci_gpio" > + GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN), > + GPIO_LOOKUP("davinci_gpio.0", 14, "scl", This too > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c > index b07c9b18d427..2efc6dbc5ac0 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ > #include <linux/dma-mapping.h> > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/gpio.h> > +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h> > #include <linux/i2c.h> > #include <linux/platform_data/pcf857x.h> > #include <linux/platform_data/at24.h> > @@ -595,18 +596,28 @@ static struct i2c_board_info __initdata i2c_info[] = { > }, > }; > > +static struct gpiod_lookup_table i2c_recovery_gpiod_table = { > + .dev_id = "i2c_davinci", > + .table = { > + GPIO_LOOKUP("davinci_gpio.0", 44, "sda", > + GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN), > + GPIO_LOOKUP("davinci_gpio.0", 43, "scl", > + GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN), > + }, > +}; And these too. With that fixed, please add: Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> I could not test the recovery itself, but the probe succeeds. It would be nice if this can be split into platform and driver parts to avoid any conflicts, but that does not seem straightforward. FWIW, the patch does not clash with anything I have queued ATM. Thanks, Sekhar
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-evm.c index 62e7bc3018f0..60aec5437276 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-evm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-evm.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h> #include <linux/i2c.h> #include <linux/gpio.h> +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h> #include <linux/clk.h> #include <linux/videodev2.h> #include <media/i2c/tvp514x.h> @@ -108,11 +109,20 @@ static struct platform_device davinci_nand_device = { }, }; +static struct gpiod_lookup_table i2c_recovery_gpiod_table = { + .dev_id = "i2c_davinci", + .table = { + GPIO_LOOKUP("davinci_gpio.0", 15, "sda", + GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN), + GPIO_LOOKUP("davinci_gpio.0", 14, "scl", + GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN), + }, +}; + static struct davinci_i2c_platform_data i2c_pdata = { .bus_freq = 400 /* kHz */, .bus_delay = 0 /* usec */, - .sda_pin = 15, - .scl_pin = 14, + .gpio_recovery = true, }; static int dm355evm_mmc_gpios = -EINVAL; @@ -141,6 +151,7 @@ static struct i2c_board_info dm355evm_i2c_info[] = { static void __init evm_init_i2c(void) { + gpiod_add_lookup_table(&i2c_recovery_gpiod_table); davinci_init_i2c(&i2c_pdata); gpio_request(5, "dm355evm_msp"); diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c index b07c9b18d427..2efc6dbc5ac0 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #include <linux/dma-mapping.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/gpio.h> +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h> #include <linux/i2c.h> #include <linux/platform_data/pcf857x.h> #include <linux/platform_data/at24.h> @@ -595,18 +596,28 @@ static struct i2c_board_info __initdata i2c_info[] = { }, }; +static struct gpiod_lookup_table i2c_recovery_gpiod_table = { + .dev_id = "i2c_davinci", + .table = { + GPIO_LOOKUP("davinci_gpio.0", 44, "sda", + GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN), + GPIO_LOOKUP("davinci_gpio.0", 43, "scl", + GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH | GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN), + }, +}; + /* The msp430 uses a slow bitbanged I2C implementation (ergo 20 KHz), * which requires 100 usec of idle bus after i2c writes sent to it. */ static struct davinci_i2c_platform_data i2c_pdata = { .bus_freq = 20 /* kHz */, .bus_delay = 100 /* usec */, - .sda_pin = 44, - .scl_pin = 43, + .gpio_recovery = true, }; static void __init evm_init_i2c(void) { + gpiod_add_lookup_table(&i2c_recovery_gpiod_table); davinci_init_i2c(&i2c_pdata); i2c_add_driver(&dm6446evm_msp_driver); i2c_register_board_info(1, i2c_info, ARRAY_SIZE(i2c_info)); diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c index 2afb12a89eb3..cb24a3ffdfa2 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/cpufreq.h> -#include <linux/gpio.h> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> #include <linux/of_device.h> #include <linux/platform_data/i2c-davinci.h> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> @@ -869,19 +869,20 @@ static int davinci_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (dev->pdata->has_pfunc) adap->bus_recovery_info = &davinci_i2c_scl_recovery_info; - else if (dev->pdata->scl_pin) { + else if (dev->pdata->gpio_recovery) { rinfo = &davinci_i2c_gpio_recovery_info; adap->bus_recovery_info = rinfo; - r = gpio_request_one(dev->pdata->scl_pin, GPIOF_OPEN_DRAIN | - GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "i2c-scl"); - if (r) + rinfo->scl_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "scl", + GPIOD_OUT_HIGH_OPEN_DRAIN); + if (IS_ERR(rinfo->scl_gpiod)) { + r = PTR_ERR(rinfo->scl_gpiod); goto err_unuse_clocks; - rinfo->scl_gpiod = gpio_to_desc(dev->pdata->scl_pin); - - r = gpio_request_one(dev->pdata->sda_pin, GPIOF_IN, "i2c-sda"); - if (r) + } + rinfo->sda_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "sda", GPIOD_IN); + if (IS_ERR(rinfo->sda_gpiod)) { + r = PTR_ERR(rinfo->sda_gpiod); goto err_unuse_clocks; - rinfo->sda_gpiod = gpio_to_desc(dev->pdata->scl_pin); + } } adap->nr = pdev->id; diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-davinci.h b/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-davinci.h index 89fd34727a24..98967df07468 100644 --- a/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-davinci.h +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-davinci.h @@ -16,9 +16,8 @@ struct davinci_i2c_platform_data { unsigned int bus_freq; /* standard bus frequency (kHz) */ unsigned int bus_delay; /* post-transaction delay (usec) */ - unsigned int sda_pin; /* GPIO pin ID to use for SDA */ - unsigned int scl_pin; /* GPIO pin ID to use for SCL */ - bool has_pfunc; /*chip has a ICPFUNC register */ + bool gpio_recovery; /* Use GPIO recovery method */ + bool has_pfunc; /* Chip has a ICPFUNC register */ }; /* for board setup code */
Alter the DaVinci GPIO recovery fetch to use descriptors all the way down into the board files. Cc: arm@kernel.org Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> --- It turns out someone else was busy doing the same thing I was doing. Trying to carry over the useful part with this patch! A Tested-by or ACK from a DaVinci maintainer would be appreciated, also an ACK from and ARM SoC maintainer. The patch can be easily tested by applying on top of linux-next. --- arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-evm.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-davinci.c | 21 +++++++++++---------- include/linux/platform_data/i2c-davinci.h | 5 ++--- 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) -- 2.14.3