Message ID | 1497879851-11057-1-git-send-email-sumit.semwal@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,1/2] selftests: lib: Skip tests on missing test modules | expand |
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> wrote: > With older kernels, printf.sh and bitmap.sh fail because they can't find > the respective test modules they are looking for. > > Add the skip portion on missing the respective test_XXX module. Error out > with the same error code as prime_numbers.sh. > > v2: Per Shuah's review, search for the module rather than do modprobe. > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh | 6 ++++++ > tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh | 6 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh > index 2da187b6ddad..b893046d511f 100755 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh > @@ -1,6 +1,12 @@ > #!/bin/sh > # Runs bitmap infrastructure tests using test_bitmap kernel module > > +if ! find /lib/modules/$(uname -r) -type f -name test_bitmap.ko | grep -q .; > +then > + echo "bitmap: test_bitmap.ko not found [SKIP]" > + exit 77 > +fi > + > if /sbin/modprobe -q test_bitmap; then > /sbin/modprobe -q -r test_bitmap > echo "bitmap: ok" > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh > index 4fdc70fe6980..804b7e75acc0 100755 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh > @@ -1,6 +1,12 @@ > #!/bin/sh > # Runs printf infrastructure using test_printf kernel module > > +if ! find /lib/modules/$(uname -r) -type f -name test_printf.ko | grep -q .; > +then > + echo "printf: test_printf.ko not found [SKIP]" > + exit 77 > +fi > + > if /sbin/modprobe -q test_printf; then > /sbin/modprobe -q -r test_printf > echo "printf: ok" This doesn't seem right to me. Can't these be built-ins too? -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
Hi Kees, On 20 June 2017 at 00:21, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> wrote: >> With older kernels, printf.sh and bitmap.sh fail because they can't find >> the respective test modules they are looking for. >> >> Add the skip portion on missing the respective test_XXX module. Error out >> with the same error code as prime_numbers.sh. >> >> v2: Per Shuah's review, search for the module rather than do modprobe. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> >> --- >> tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh | 6 ++++++ >> tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh | 6 ++++++ >> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh >> index 2da187b6ddad..b893046d511f 100755 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh >> @@ -1,6 +1,12 @@ >> #!/bin/sh >> # Runs bitmap infrastructure tests using test_bitmap kernel module >> >> +if ! find /lib/modules/$(uname -r) -type f -name test_bitmap.ko | grep -q .; >> +then >> + echo "bitmap: test_bitmap.ko not found [SKIP]" >> + exit 77 >> +fi >> + >> if /sbin/modprobe -q test_bitmap; then >> /sbin/modprobe -q -r test_bitmap >> echo "bitmap: ok" >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh >> index 4fdc70fe6980..804b7e75acc0 100755 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh >> @@ -1,6 +1,12 @@ >> #!/bin/sh >> # Runs printf infrastructure using test_printf kernel module >> >> +if ! find /lib/modules/$(uname -r) -type f -name test_printf.ko | grep -q .; >> +then >> + echo "printf: test_printf.ko not found [SKIP]" >> + exit 77 >> +fi >> + >> if /sbin/modprobe -q test_printf; then >> /sbin/modprobe -q -r test_printf >> echo "printf: ok" > > This doesn't seem right to me. Can't these be built-ins too? > Yes, it can be. I'm running test right now to check presence of module with -q -n; that should take care of builtin as well. will send an updated patch soon. > -Kees > > -- > Kees Cook > Pixel Security Best, Sumit.
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh index 2da187b6ddad..b893046d511f 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh @@ -1,6 +1,12 @@ #!/bin/sh # Runs bitmap infrastructure tests using test_bitmap kernel module +if ! find /lib/modules/$(uname -r) -type f -name test_bitmap.ko | grep -q .; +then + echo "bitmap: test_bitmap.ko not found [SKIP]" + exit 77 +fi + if /sbin/modprobe -q test_bitmap; then /sbin/modprobe -q -r test_bitmap echo "bitmap: ok" diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh index 4fdc70fe6980..804b7e75acc0 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh @@ -1,6 +1,12 @@ #!/bin/sh # Runs printf infrastructure using test_printf kernel module +if ! find /lib/modules/$(uname -r) -type f -name test_printf.ko | grep -q .; +then + echo "printf: test_printf.ko not found [SKIP]" + exit 77 +fi + if /sbin/modprobe -q test_printf; then /sbin/modprobe -q -r test_printf echo "printf: ok"
With older kernels, printf.sh and bitmap.sh fail because they can't find the respective test modules they are looking for. Add the skip portion on missing the respective test_XXX module. Error out with the same error code as prime_numbers.sh. v2: Per Shuah's review, search for the module rather than do modprobe. Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/lib/bitmap.sh | 6 ++++++ tools/testing/selftests/lib/printf.sh | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+) -- 2.7.4