Message ID | 20161017221355.1861551-7-arnd@arndb.de |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | None | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c index b777e1b..78d9966 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c @@ -4516,7 +4516,7 @@ brcmf_cfg80211_start_ap(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device *ndev, /* store current 11d setting */ if (brcmf_fil_cmd_int_get(ifp, BRCMF_C_GET_REGULATORY, &ifp->vif->is_11d)) { - supports_11d = false; + is_11d = supports_11d = false; } else { country_ie = brcmf_parse_tlvs((u8 *)settings->beacon.tail, settings->beacon.tail_len,
A bugfix added a sanity check around the assignment and use of the 'is_11d' variable, which looks correct to me, but as the function is rather complex already, this confuses the compiler to the point where it can no longer figure out if the variable is always initialized correctly: brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c: In function ‘brcmf_cfg80211_start_ap’: brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c:4586:10: error: ‘is_11d’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] This adds an initialization for the newly introduced case in which the variable should not really be used, in order to make the warning go away. Fixes: b3589dfe0212 ("brcmfmac: ignore 11d configuration errors") Cc: Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@broadcom.com> Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.9.0