@@ -26,7 +26,12 @@ void __check_vmalloc_seq(struct mm_struct *mm);
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_ASID
void check_and_switch_context(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk);
-#define init_new_context(tsk,mm) ({ atomic64_set(&(mm)->context.id, 0); 0; })
+static inline int
+init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ atomic64_set(&mm->context.id, 0);
+ return 0;
+}
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_ERRATA_798181
void a15_erratum_get_cpumask(int this_cpu, struct mm_struct *mm,
@@ -85,7 +90,12 @@ static inline void finish_arch_post_lock_switch(void)
#endif /* CONFIG_MMU */
-#define init_new_context(tsk,mm) 0
+static inline int
+init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_HAS_ASID */
Almost all architectures define init_new_context() as a function, but on ARM, it's a macro and that causes a compiler warning when its return code is not used: drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c: In function 'efi_virtmap_init': arch/arm/include/asm/mmu_context.h:88:34: warning: statement with no effect [-Wunused-value] #define init_new_context(tsk,mm) 0 drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c:47:2: note: in expansion of macro 'init_new_context' init_new_context(NULL, &efi_mm); This changes the definition into an inline function, which gcc does not warn about. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: f7d924894265 ("arm64/efi: refactor EFI init and runtime code for reuse by 32-bit ARM") --- This has newly showed up in ARM randconfig builds