| Message ID | 1454067557-3546883-7-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2,1/7] net: moxart: use correct accessors for DMA memory | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c index ecc4a334c507..f71ab2647a3b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int nb8800_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) nb8800_tx_done(dev); again: - while (work < budget) { + do { struct nb8800_rx_buf *rxb; unsigned int len; @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ again: rxd->report = 0; last = next; work++; - } + } while (work < budget); if (work) { priv->rx_descs[last].desc.config |= DESC_EOC;
The nb8800_poll() function initializes the 'next' variable in the loop looking for new input data. We know this will be called at least once because 'budget' is a guaranteed to be a positive number when we enter the function, but the compiler doesn't know that and warns when the variable is used later: drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c: In function 'nb8800_poll': drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c:350:21: warning: 'next' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] Changing the 'while() {}' loop to 'do {} while()' makes it obvious to the compiler what is going on so it no longer warns. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/aurora/nb8800.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.7.0