| Message ID | 20250221-rmv_return-v1-1-cc8dff275827@quicinc.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Remove weird and needless 'return' for void APIs | expand |
On 2025/2/22 04:01, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> */ >> static inline void tlb_remove_page(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct page *page) >> { >> - return tlb_remove_page_size(tlb, page, PAGE_SIZE); >> + tlb_remove_page_size(tlb, page, PAGE_SIZE); >> } > So I don't mind removing it, but note that that return enforces > tlb_remove_page_size() has void return type. > tlb_remove_page_size() is void function already. (^^) > It might not be your preferred coding style, but it is not completely > pointless. based on below C spec such as C17 description. i guess language C does not like this usage "return void function in void function"; C spec such as C17 have this description about return statement: 6.8.6.4: A return statement with an expression shall not appear in a function whose return type is void. A return statement without an expression shall only appear in a function whose return type is void.
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h index e402aef79c93..812110813b84 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static __always_inline bool __tlb_remove_page(struct mmu_gather *tlb, */ static inline void tlb_remove_page(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct page *page) { - return tlb_remove_page_size(tlb, page, PAGE_SIZE); + tlb_remove_page_size(tlb, page, PAGE_SIZE); } static inline void tlb_remove_ptdesc(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *pt)
Remove needless 'return' in void API tlb_remove_page() since both the API and tlb_remove_page_size() are void functions. Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com> --- include/asm-generic/tlb.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)