mbox series

[v3,00/19] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

Message ID 20241210-converge-secs-to-jiffies-v3-0-ddfefd7e9f2a@linux.microsoft.com
Headers show
Series Converge on using secs_to_jiffies() | expand

Message

Easwar Hariharan Dec. 10, 2024, 10:02 p.m. UTC
This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.[1] In the review for
that series, Anna-Maria requested converting other users with
Coccinelle. [2] This is part 1 that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies()
that use the multiply pattern of either of:
- msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000), or
- msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC)

where N is a constant, to avoid the multiplication.

The entire conversion is made with Coccinelle in the script added in
patch 2. Some changes suggested by Coccinelle have been deferred to
later parts that will address other possible variant patterns.

CC: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241030-open-coded-timeouts-v3-0-9ba123facf88@linux.microsoft.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/8734kngfni.fsf@somnus/

---
Changes in v3:
- Rebase on next-20241210
- Fix typo'ed timeout in net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c (Stephen Rothwell)
- Use Coccinelle operation modes for Coccinelle script (Markus Elfring)
- Remove redundant comments in arch/arm/mach-pxa/sharpsl_pm.c
  (Christophe Leroy)
- Remove excess line breaks (Heiko Carstens, Christophe Leroy)
- Add more detail into the commit messages throughout (Christophe Leroy)
- Pick up Reviewed-by Thomas Hellström for drm/xe
- Drop drm/etnaviv patch already queued into etnaviv/next
- Replace call to [m]secs_to_jiffies(0) with just 0 for livepatch (Dan
  Carpenter, Christophe Leroy)
- Split out nfp patch to send to net-next (Christophe Leroy)
- Pick up Acked-by from Jeff Johnson for ath11k
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115-converge-secs-to-jiffies-v2-0-911fb7595e79@linux.microsoft.com
Changes in v2:
- Exclude already accepted patch adding secs_to_jiffies() https://git.kernel.org/tip/b35108a51cf7bab58d7eace1267d7965978bcdb8
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241115-converge-secs-to-jiffies-v1-0-19aadc34941b@linux.microsoft.com

---
Easwar Hariharan (19):
      netfilter: conntrack: Cleanup timeout definitions
      coccinelle: misc: Add secs_to_jiffies script
      arm: pxa: Convert timeouts to use secs_to_jiffies()
      s390: kernel: Convert timeouts to use secs_to_jiffies()
      powerpc/papr_scm: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
      mm: kmemleak: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
      accel/habanalabs: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
      drm/xe: Convert timeout to secs_to_jiffies()
      scsi: lpfc: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
      scsi: arcmsr: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
      scsi: pm8001: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
      xen/blkback: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
      gve: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
      wifi: ath11k: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
      Bluetooth: MGMT: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
      staging: vc04_services: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
      ceph: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
      livepatch: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()
      ALSA: line6: Convert timeouts to secs_to_jiffies()

 arch/arm/mach-pxa/sharpsl_pm.c                     |  8 ++++----
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c          |  2 +-
 arch/s390/kernel/lgr.c                             |  2 +-
 arch/s390/kernel/time.c                            |  4 ++--
 arch/s390/kernel/topology.c                        |  2 +-
 drivers/accel/habanalabs/common/device.c           |  2 +-
 drivers/accel/habanalabs/common/habanalabs_drv.c   |  3 +--
 drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c                |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c                     |  2 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_tx_dqo.c       |  6 ++----
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/debugfs.c          |  2 +-
 drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c                   |  2 +-
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c                      | 18 +++++++++---------
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nportdisc.c                 |  8 ++++----
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_nvme.c                      |  2 +-
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_sli.c                       |  4 ++--
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_vmid.c                      |  2 +-
 drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c                  |  2 +-
 .../vc04_services/bcm2835-audio/bcm2835-vchiq.c    |  2 +-
 fs/ceph/quota.c                                    |  2 +-
 mm/kmemleak.c                                      |  4 ++--
 net/bluetooth/mgmt.c                               |  2 +-
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c            | 21 ++++++++-------------
 samples/livepatch/livepatch-callbacks-busymod.c    |  3 +--
 samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix1.c          |  3 +--
 samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-mod.c           | 15 +++++----------
 scripts/coccinelle/misc/secs_to_jiffies.cocci      | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 sound/usb/line6/toneport.c                         |  2 +-
 28 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 1b2ab8149928c1cea2d7eca30cd35bb7fe014053
change-id: 20241112-converge-secs-to-jiffies-d99d1016bd11

Best regards,

Comments

Andrew Morton Dec. 10, 2024, 11:36 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:14:22 -0800 Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:

> On 12/10/2024 2:02 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> > This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
> > secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.[1] In the review for
> > that series, Anna-Maria requested converting other users with
> > Coccinelle. [2] This is part 1 that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies()
> > that use the multiply pattern of either of:
> > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000), or
> > - msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC)
> > 
> > where N is a constant, to avoid the multiplication.
> > 
> > The entire conversion is made with Coccinelle in the script added in
> > patch 2. Some changes suggested by Coccinelle have been deferred to
> > later parts that will address other possible variant patterns.
> > 
> > CC: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> I have the same question as before: How do you expect these to land?
> Do you now have a maintainer who will take all of them?
> Or do you want individual maintainers to take the ones applicable to them?

I'll just grab everything and see if anyone complains ;)
Easwar Hariharan Dec. 11, 2024, 1 a.m. UTC | #2
On 12/10/2024 4:35 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 22:02:31 +0000 Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
>> This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
>> secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.
> 
> Thanks, I added this to mm.git.  I suppressed the usual added-to-mm
> emails because soooo many cc's!
> 
> I'd ask relevant maintainers to send in any acks and I'll paste them
> into the relevant changelogs.

Thank you, Andrew!

- Easwar
Andrew Morton Dec. 11, 2024, 2:31 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 17:35:48 -0800 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 15:36:04 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > I have the same question as before: How do you expect these to land?
> > > Do you now have a maintainer who will take all of them?
> > > Or do you want individual maintainers to take the ones applicable to them?  
> > 
> > I'll just grab everything and see if anyone complains ;)
> 
> I may, if this leads to a conflict :(

Very unlikely, and any such conflict will be trivial.

> Easwar, please break this up per subsystem.

The series is already one-patch-per-changed-file.
Andrew Morton Dec. 11, 2024, 2:50 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:41:29 -0800 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:31:30 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > I'll just grab everything and see if anyone complains ;)  
> > > 
> > > I may, if this leads to a conflict :(  
> > 
> > Very unlikely, and any such conflict will be trivial.
> 
> Agreed, mainly I don't understand why we'd make an exception
> and take the patchset via a special tree.

It saves work for everyone?

The patches are super-simple.  If a maintainer chooses to merge one of
them, Stephen tells us and I drop the mm.git copy.  It's all so easy.
Easwar Hariharan Dec. 11, 2024, 4:34 a.m. UTC | #5
On 12/10/2024 6:41 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:31:30 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> I'll just grab everything and see if anyone complains ;)  
>>>
>>> I may, if this leads to a conflict :(  
>>
>> Very unlikely, and any such conflict will be trivial.
> 
> Agreed, mainly I don't understand why we'd make an exception
> and take the patchset via a special tree.
> 
>>> Easwar, please break this up per subsystem.  
>>
>> The series is already one-patch-per-changed-file.
> 
> More confusingly still, they did send one standalone patch for 
> an Ethernet driver:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241210-converge-secs-to-jiffies-v3-20-59479891e658@linux.microsoft.com/
> And yet another Ethernet driver (drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/) 
> is converted in this series.

Sorry about the confusion, I missed pulling the gve patch from this
series. I'll send that (and ath11k) separately as well. I'll pull all
these together into a series so you can merge them together if you prefer.

Thanks,
Easwar
Easwar Hariharan Dec. 17, 2024, 8:53 p.m. UTC | #6
On 12/10/2024 5:00 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> On 12/10/2024 4:35 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 22:02:31 +0000 Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
>>> secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.
>>
>> Thanks, I added this to mm.git.  I suppressed the usual added-to-mm
>> emails because soooo many cc's!
>>
>> I'd ask relevant maintainers to send in any acks and I'll paste them
>> into the relevant changelogs.
> 
> Thank you, Andrew!
> 
> - Easwar

Hi Andrew,

There have been a couple of comments[1][2] that came in after you queued
the series to mm. Would you rather I send individual patches addressing
these, or just send a v4 of the entire series (-netdev of course) so you
can replace it wholesale?

Thanks,
Easwar

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/07784753-6874-4dda-a080-2d2812f4a10a@csgroup.eu/
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z2G1ZPL2cAlQOYlF@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com/
Andrew Morton Dec. 17, 2024, 9:12 p.m. UTC | #7
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 12:53:22 -0800 Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:

> There have been a couple of comments[1][2] that came in after you queued
> the series to mm. Would you rather I send individual patches addressing
> these, or just send a v4 of the entire series (-netdev of course) so you
> can replace it wholesale?

Individual small fixes would be preferable please.  Mainly to
preserve the validity of current review efforts.