Message ID | cover.1731377399.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | bnxt: Fix failure to report RSS context in ntuple rule | expand |
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 19:23:31 -0700 Daniel Xu wrote: > Extend the rss_ctx test suite to test that an ntuple action that > redirects to an RSS context contains that information in `ethtool -n`. > Otherwise the output from ethtool is highly deceiving. This test helps > ensure drivers are compliant with the API. Looks like it doesn't apply, please base the v3 on net rather than net-next, I'll deal with the merge.
Hi Ed, On Tue, Nov 12, 2024, at 3:10 AM, Edward Cree wrote: > On 12/11/2024 02:23, Daniel Xu wrote: >> Extend the rss_ctx test suite to test that an ntuple action that >> redirects to an RSS context contains that information in `ethtool -n`. >> Otherwise the output from ethtool is highly deceiving. This test helps >> ensure drivers are compliant with the API. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> > ... >> +def _ntuple_rule_check(cfg, rule_id, ctx_id): >> + """Check that ntuple rule references RSS context ID""" >> + text = ethtool(f"-n {cfg.ifname} rule {rule_id}").stdout >> + pattern = f"RSS Context ID: {ctx_id}" >> + ksft_true(re.search(pattern, text, re.IGNORECASE), > > This won't match the output from your ethtool patch, because that > removes the colon. Probably want to wait until the patch is > finalised and then write a regex that matches both versions. Argh, I meant to have wildcards here. But yeah, makes sense, will wait until the other patch is finalized. Thanks, Daniel
Hi Jakub, On Tue, Nov 12, 2024, at 5:44 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 19:23:31 -0700 Daniel Xu wrote: >> Extend the rss_ctx test suite to test that an ntuple action that >> redirects to an RSS context contains that information in `ethtool -n`. >> Otherwise the output from ethtool is highly deceiving. This test helps >> ensure drivers are compliant with the API. > > Looks like it doesn't apply, please base the v3 on net rather than > net-next, I'll deal with the merge. Sorry about that. Will think on how to make my workflow not involve manually retyping patches between different machines...
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 17:51:50 -0800 Daniel Xu wrote: > > This won't match the output from your ethtool patch, because that > > removes the colon. Probably want to wait until the patch is > > finalised and then write a regex that matches both versions. > > Argh, I meant to have wildcards here. But yeah, makes sense, will wait > until the other patch is finalized. Keep in mind Michal scans ethtool patches once every week or two, so there may be a bit of a delay there.