Message ID | 20241023-en7581-pinctrl-v9-0-afb0cbcab0ec@kernel.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add mfd, pinctrl and pwm support to EN7581 SoC | expand |
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 1:21 AM Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> wrote: > Introduce airoha-mfd driver in order to load pinctrl and pwm drivers for > EN7581 SoC. airoha-mfd is needed since both pinctrl and pwm drivers > needs to access the same memory block (gpio memory region) to configure > {gio,irq}_chip and pwm functionalities respectively, so model them as > childs of a parent mfd driver. OK someone has to merge this and I suggest that I merge patches 1-5 (all bindings and the pinctrl driver) since the different bindings have dependencies between them. Then Uwe can merge patch 6/6 (the pwm driver). Anyone against? Yours, Linus Walleij
Hello Linus, On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:03:14PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 1:21 AM Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> wrote: > > > Introduce airoha-mfd driver in order to load pinctrl and pwm drivers for > > EN7581 SoC. airoha-mfd is needed since both pinctrl and pwm drivers > > needs to access the same memory block (gpio memory region) to configure > > {gio,irq}_chip and pwm functionalities respectively, so model them as > > childs of a parent mfd driver. > > OK someone has to merge this and I suggest that I merge patches 1-5 > (all bindings and the pinctrl driver) since the different bindings have > dependencies between them. Fine for me. > Then Uwe can merge patch 6/6 (the pwm driver). The pwm patch needs some more love, we can handle that separately then. Best regards and thanks, Uwe
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 08:34:01AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello Linus, > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:03:14PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 1:21 AM Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Introduce airoha-mfd driver in order to load pinctrl and pwm drivers for > > > > EN7581 SoC. airoha-mfd is needed since both pinctrl and pwm drivers > > > > needs to access the same memory block (gpio memory region) to configure > > > > {gio,irq}_chip and pwm functionalities respectively, so model them as > > > > childs of a parent mfd driver. > > > > > > OK someone has to merge this and I suggest that I merge patches 1-5 > > > (all bindings and the pinctrl driver) since the different bindings have > > > dependencies between them. > > > > Fine for me. > > > > > Then Uwe can merge patch 6/6 (the pwm driver). > > > > The pwm patch needs some more love, we can handle that separately then. > > > > Thanks for the feedback, so I assume we will detach the DT and PWM > driver from this driver and handle it separately. Yep, discussing with Linus, he is fine to get patches {1/6-5/6} via pinctrl tree while patch 6/6 can go via Uwe's one. It seems we are good for patches {1/6-5/6} and I will fix patch 6/6 separately. Regards, Lorenzo > > -- > Ansuel
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:03 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 1:21 AM Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> wrote: > > > Introduce airoha-mfd driver in order to load pinctrl and pwm drivers for > > EN7581 SoC. airoha-mfd is needed since both pinctrl and pwm drivers > > needs to access the same memory block (gpio memory region) to configure > > {gio,irq}_chip and pwm functionalities respectively, so model them as > > childs of a parent mfd driver. > > OK someone has to merge this and I suggest that I merge patches 1-5 > (all bindings and the pinctrl driver) since the different bindings have > dependencies between them. OK I have now merged patches 1-5 to the pinctrl tree. Please iterate patch 6 with the PWM people so Uwe can merge it when finished. Yours, Linus Walleij