| Message ID | 20241017080638.13074-1-pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] wifi: rtw88: Refactor looping in rtw_phy_store_tx_power_by_rate | expand |
Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com> wrote: > The previous implementation included an unnecessary else > condition paired with a continue statement. Since a check > is already performed to determine if the band is either > 2G or 5G, the else condition will never be triggered. > We can remove this check. > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410171143.OnFlgIwK-lkp@intel.com/ no need this Closes link because of typo of v1. I will remove this during merging. > Signed-off-by: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> > --- > v2: > - Changed from using a pointer approach to a simpler if-else structure for clarity. > --- > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c > index 37ef80c9091d..8b9f8f73c14c 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c > @@ -1470,10 +1470,8 @@ static void rtw_phy_store_tx_power_by_rate(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, > rate = rates[i]; > if (band == PHY_BAND_2G) > hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_2g[rfpath][rate] = offset; > - else if (band == PHY_BAND_5G) > - hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_5g[rfpath][rate] = offset; > else > - continue; > + hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_5g[rfpath][rate] = offset; > } > } > > -- > 2.47.0
Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com> wrote: > The previous implementation included an unnecessary else > condition paired with a continue statement. Since a check > is already performed to determine if the band is either > 2G or 5G, the else condition will never be triggered. > We can remove this check. > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410171143.OnFlgIwK-lkp@intel.com/ > Signed-off-by: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com> > Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> 1 patch(es) applied to rtw-next branch of rtw.git, thanks. 7846f0b63562 wifi: rtw88: Refactor looping in rtw_phy_store_tx_power_by_rate --- https://github.com/pkshih/rtw.git
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c index 37ef80c9091d..8b9f8f73c14c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c @@ -1470,10 +1470,8 @@ static void rtw_phy_store_tx_power_by_rate(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, rate = rates[i]; if (band == PHY_BAND_2G) hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_2g[rfpath][rate] = offset; - else if (band == PHY_BAND_5G) - hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_5g[rfpath][rate] = offset; else - continue; + hal->tx_pwr_by_rate_offset_5g[rfpath][rate] = offset; } }
The previous implementation included an unnecessary else condition paired with a continue statement. Since a check is already performed to determine if the band is either 2G or 5G, the else condition will never be triggered. We can remove this check. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410171143.OnFlgIwK-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003@gmail.com> --- v2: - Changed from using a pointer approach to a simpler if-else structure for clarity. --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)