mbox series

[v8,0/3] fix abort defect

Message ID 20240923080344.19084-1-peter.wang@mediatek.com
Headers show
Series fix abort defect | expand

Message

Peter Wang (王信友) Sept. 23, 2024, 8:03 a.m. UTC
From: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>

V8:
 - Remove the abort variable to simplify the abort process.
 - Correct error handler successfully aborts release flow.
 - Ingore MCQ OCS: ABORTED.

V7:
 - Use a variable instead of a flag.
 - Add a check for MCQ mode when setting this variable to UFS_ERR_HANDLER.
 - Print OCS information for OCS_ABORTED and OCS_INVALID_COMMAND_STATUS.
 - Add a MediaTek quirk for handling OCS_ABORTED in SDB mode.
 - Skip notifying SCSI from ISR during SCSI abort (ufshcd_abort()).

V6:
 - Add err handler check before set flag true.

V5:
 - Change flag name.
 - Amend comment and patch description.

V4:
 - Remove nullify SQ entry abort requeue.
 - Add more comment for flag usage and set description.
 - Fix build warning.

V3:
 - Change comment and use variable(rtc) for error print
 - Change flag name and move flag set before ufshcd_clear_cmd
 - Add SDB mode clear UTRLCLR tag receive OCS_ABORTED requeue

V2:
 - Fix mcq_enabled build error.

Peter Wang (3):
  ufs: core: fix the issue of ICU failure
  ufs: core: fix error handler process for MCQ abort
  ufs: core: add a quirk for MediaTek SDB mode aborted

 drivers/ufs/core/ufs-mcq.c      | 15 ++++++++-------
 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c       | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c |  1 +
 include/ufs/ufshcd.h            |  6 ++++++
 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Bart Van Assche Sept. 23, 2024, 6:15 p.m. UTC | #1
On 9/23/24 1:03 AM, peter.wang@mediatek.com wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index b5c7bc50a27e..b42079c3d634 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -5404,7 +5404,10 @@ ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp,
>   		}
>   		break;
>   	case OCS_ABORTED:
> -		result |= DID_ABORT << 16;
> +		if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_OCS_ABORTED)
> +			result |= DID_REQUEUE << 16;
> +		else
> +			result |= DID_ABORT << 16;
>   		dev_warn(hba->dev,
>   				"OCS aborted from controller = %x for tag %d\n",
>   				ocs, lrbp->task_tag);

I think the approach of this patch is racy: the cmd->result assignment
by ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status() races with the cmd->result assignment by
ufshcd_abort_one(). How about addressing this race as follows?
* In ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(), if the OCS_ABORTED status is encountered,
   set a completion.
* In the code that aborts SCSI commands, for MediaTek controllers only,
   wait for that completion (based on a quirk).
* Instead of introducing an if-statement in
   ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status(), rely on the cmd->result value assigned
   by ufshcd_abort_one().

Thanks,

Bart.
Peter Wang (王信友) Sept. 24, 2024, 8:51 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, 2024-09-23 at 11:15 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>  	 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>  On 9/23/24 1:03 AM, peter.wang@mediatek.com wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> > index b5c7bc50a27e..b42079c3d634 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> > @@ -5404,7 +5404,10 @@ ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status(struct ufs_hba
> *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp,
> >   }
> >   break;
> >   case OCS_ABORTED:
> > -result |= DID_ABORT << 16;
> > +if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_OCS_ABORTED)
> > +result |= DID_REQUEUE << 16;
> > +else
> > +result |= DID_ABORT << 16;
> >   dev_warn(hba->dev,
> >   "OCS aborted from controller = %x for tag %d\n",
> >   ocs, lrbp->task_tag);
> 
> I think the approach of this patch is racy: the cmd->result
> assignment
> by ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status() races with the cmd->result assignment
> by
> ufshcd_abort_one(). How about addressing this race as follows?
> * In ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(), if the OCS_ABORTED status is
> encountered,
>    set a completion.
> * In the code that aborts SCSI commands, for MediaTek controllers
> only,
>    wait for that completion (based on a quirk).
> * Instead of introducing an if-statement in
>    ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status(), rely on the cmd->result value
> assigned
>    by ufshcd_abort_one().
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.

Hi Bart,

Sorry, I might not have understood the potential racing issue here.

The SCSI abort command doesn't need to wait for completion because 
SCSI doesn't care about cmd->result, right?

The error handler abort also doesn't need to wait for completion, 
because it should have a guaranteed order?
Firstly, ufshcd_abort_one is only likely to be filled 
back with OCS: ABORTED by MediaTek UFS controller after 
ufshcd_try_to_abort_task, and the sequence is as follows.

ufshcd_err_handler()
  ufshcd_abort_all()
    ufshcd_abort_one()
      ufshcd_try_to_abort_task()	// trigger mediatek controller
fill OCS: ABORTED
    ufshcd_complete_requests()
      ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()
        ufshcd_poll()
          get outstanding_lock
          clear outstanding_reqs tag
          release outstanding_lock	
          __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()
            ufshcd_compl_one_cqe()
              cmd->result = DID_REQUEUE // mediatek may need quirk
change DID_ABORT to DID_REQUEUE


In addition, the ISR will use the outstanding_lock with 
ufshcd_err_handler to provide protection, so there won't be any 
racing that causes the command to be released repeatedly. 
The only possible issue might be that after ufshcd_abort_one, 
the MediaTek UFS controller has not yet filled in OCS: ABORTED 
and has entered ufshcd_transfer_rsp_status for checking. 
But this doesn't matter, because it will just be treated 
as OCS_INVALID_COMMAND_STATUS.

Is there any corner case that I might have overlooked?


Thanks.
Peter



>
Bart Van Assche Sept. 24, 2024, 7:36 p.m. UTC | #3
On 9/24/24 1:51 AM, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
> Is there any corner case that I might have overlooked?

Maybe I misunderstood how MediaTek controllers work. Anyway, if a
MediaTek controller reports the completion status OCS_ABORTED, is
there any chance that this status will be reported after
ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd() has been called? Is there any chance that
the controller writing OCS_ABORTED into the status field will race
with the host software overwriting that status field while submitting
a new command?

Thanks,

Bart.
Peter Wang (王信友) Sept. 25, 2024, 5:19 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, 2024-09-24 at 12:36 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>  	 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>  On 9/24/24 1:51 AM, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
> > Is there any corner case that I might have overlooked?
> 
> Maybe I misunderstood how MediaTek controllers work. Anyway, if a
> MediaTek controller reports the completion status OCS_ABORTED, is
> there any chance that this status will be reported after
> ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd() has been called? Is there any chance that
> the controller writing OCS_ABORTED into the status field will race
> with the host software overwriting that status field while submitting
> a new command?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
> 


Hi Bart,

Okay, I may not have clearly explained the behavior of the 
MediaTek UFS controller.

In the UFSHCI specification, under the description of UTRLCLR.
After writing to UTRLCLR, when UTRLDBR is cleared to 0,
the MediaTek UFS controller will simultaneously change the 
OCS to ABORTED. So, OCS: ABORTED is filled at the moment 
when ufshcd_clear_cmd successfully waits for DBR to clear. 
That's why I wrote it like this: 
ufshcd_try_to_abort_task() // triggers MediaTek controller to fill OCS:
ABORTED

Therefore, the status should already be ABORTED before 
ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd, so there shouldn't be a racing issue.

Thanks.
Peter