Message ID | 20240913121110.1611340-1-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Introduce initial AMD ASF Controller driver support | expand |
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 05:41:05PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: > Export the following i2c_piix4 driver functions as a library so that the > AMD ASF driver can utilize these core functionalities from the i2c_piix4 > driver: > > - piix4_sb800_region_request(): Request access to a specific SMBus region > on the SB800 chipset. > > - piix4_sb800_region_release(): Release the previously requested SMBus > region on the SB800 chipset. > > - piix4_transaction(): Handle SMBus transactions between the SMBus > controller and connected devices. > > - piix4_sb800_port_sel(): Select the appropriate SMBus port on the SB800 > chipset. > > By making these functions available as a library, enable the AMD ASF > driver to leverage the established mechanisms in the i2c_piix4 driver, > promoting code reuse and consistency across different drivers. > Note that the git diff view is presented in two separate lines in order to > suppress the checkpatch.pl "CHECKS". This paragraph should be in comment block rather than commit message body... > Co-developed-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@amd.com> > Signed-off-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@amd.com> > Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> > --- ...somewhere here. ... > +int piix4_sb800_region_request(struct device *dev, > + struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) One line? ... > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_region_request); Use namespaced exports (with _NS) from day 1. ... > +void piix4_sb800_region_release(struct device *dev, > + struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_region_release); Same comments as per above. ... > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_transaction); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_port_sel); _NS
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 05:41:09PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: > To ensure successive interrupts upon packet reception, it is necessary to > clear the remote IRR bit by writing the interrupt number to the EOI > register. The base address for this operation is provided by the BIOS and > retrieved by the driver by traversing the ASF object's namespace. ... > + eoi_addr = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > + if (!eoi_addr) > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -EINVAL, "missing MEM resources\n"); > + > + asf_dev->eoi_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, eoi_addr->start, resource_size(eoi_addr)); > + if (!asf_dev->eoi_base) > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -EBUSY, "failed mapping IO region\n"); Home grown copy of devm_platform_ioremap_resource().
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 05:41:03PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: > Currently, `piix4_transaction()` accepts only one parameter, which is the > `i2c_adapter` information. This approach works well as long as SB800 SMBus > port accesses are confined to the piix4 driver. However, with the > implementation of a separate ASF driver and the varying address spaces > across drivers, it is necessary to change the function parameter list of > `piix4_transaction()` to include the port address. This modification > allows other drivers that use piix4 to pass the specific port details they > need to operate on. FWIW, Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
On 9/14/2024 00:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 05:41:05PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: >> Export the following i2c_piix4 driver functions as a library so that the >> AMD ASF driver can utilize these core functionalities from the i2c_piix4 >> driver: >> >> - piix4_sb800_region_request(): Request access to a specific SMBus region >> on the SB800 chipset. >> >> - piix4_sb800_region_release(): Release the previously requested SMBus >> region on the SB800 chipset. >> >> - piix4_transaction(): Handle SMBus transactions between the SMBus >> controller and connected devices. >> >> - piix4_sb800_port_sel(): Select the appropriate SMBus port on the SB800 >> chipset. >> >> By making these functions available as a library, enable the AMD ASF >> driver to leverage the established mechanisms in the i2c_piix4 driver, >> promoting code reuse and consistency across different drivers. > >> Note that the git diff view is presented in two separate lines in order to >> suppress the checkpatch.pl "CHECKS". > > This paragraph should be in comment block rather than commit message body... > I can move it to comment block but in the last version Andi mentioned that I have to leave a note about the function within one line. >> Co-developed-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@amd.com> >> Signed-off-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@amd.com> >> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> >> --- > > ...somewhere here. > > ... > >> +int piix4_sb800_region_request(struct device *dev, >> + struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) > > One line? > I am OK to do it, but Andi has a preference to stay within 80 character wide length. Andi, what are you thoughts? Thanks, Shyam > ... > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_region_request); > > Use namespaced exports (with _NS) from day 1. > > ... > >> +void piix4_sb800_region_release(struct device *dev, >> + struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_region_release); > > Same comments as per above. > > ... > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_transaction); >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(piix4_sb800_port_sel); > > _NS >
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 12:01:19AM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: > On 9/14/2024 00:49, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 05:41:09PM +0530, Shyam Sundar S K wrote: ... > >> + eoi_addr = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > >> + if (!eoi_addr) > >> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -EINVAL, "missing MEM resources\n"); > >> + > >> + asf_dev->eoi_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, eoi_addr->start, resource_size(eoi_addr)); > >> + if (!asf_dev->eoi_base) > >> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -EBUSY, "failed mapping IO region\n"); > > > > Home grown copy of devm_platform_ioremap_resource(). > > devm_platform_ioremap_resource() internally calls > devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(), performing two main actions: > > It uses platform_get_resource(). > It then calls devm_ioremap_resource(). > > However, there's an issue. > > devm_ioremap_resource() invokes devm_request_mem_region() followed by > __devm_ioremap(). In this driver, the resource obtained via ASL might > not actually belong to the ASF device address space. Instead, it could > be within other IP blocks of the ASIC, which are crucial for > generating subsequent interrupts (the main focus of this patch). As a > result, devm_request_mem_region() fails, preventing __devm_ioremap() > from being executed. > > TL;DR, it’s more appropriate to call platform_get_resource() and > devm_ioremap() separately in this scenario. Okay, at bare minimum this must be commented in the code (like the above summary). Ideally it should be done differently as the resource regions should not be shared (it's an exceptional case and usually shows bad design of the driver). If you can't really split, regmap APIs help with that (and they also may provide an adequate serialisation to IO).
Hi Shyam, ... > >> Note that the git diff view is presented in two separate lines in order to > >> suppress the checkpatch.pl "CHECKS". > > > > This paragraph should be in comment block rather than commit message body... > > > > I can move it to comment block but in the last version Andi mentioned > that I have to leave a note about the function within one line. > > >> Co-developed-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@amd.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Sanket Goswami <Sanket.Goswami@amd.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> > >> --- > > > > ...somewhere here. > > > > ... > > > >> +int piix4_sb800_region_request(struct device *dev, > >> + struct sb800_mmio_cfg *mmio_cfg) > > > > One line? > > > > I am OK to do it, but Andi has a preference to stay within 80 > character wide length. > > Andi, what are you thoughts? I apologize for my earlier review of v4. I failed to notice that you had removed the "static" (which you had properly described). I mistakenly thought you had made an unrelated line adjustment. I'm sorry for requesting a new version. Please feel free to use the format you prefer. Andi PS: I still prefer 80 characters per line, but this is just a personal, non-binding preference.