diff mbox series

crypto: hisilicon/zip - Optimize performance by replacing rw_lock with spinlock

Message ID 20240823183856.561166-1-visitorckw@gmail.com
State Accepted
Commit be9c336852056e2c34369de79fd938dc21a2d5cf
Headers show
Series crypto: hisilicon/zip - Optimize performance by replacing rw_lock with spinlock | expand

Commit Message

Kuan-Wei Chiu Aug. 23, 2024, 6:38 p.m. UTC
The req_lock is currently implemented as a rw_lock, but there are no
instances where read_lock() is called. This means that the lock is
effectively only used by writers, making it functionally equivalent to
a simple spinlock.

As stated in Documentation/locking/spinlocks.rst:
"Reader-writer locks require more atomic memory operations than simple
spinlocks. Unless the reader critical section is long, you are better
off just using spinlocks."

Since the rw_lock in this case incurs additional atomic memory
operations without any benefit from reader-writer locking, it is more
efficient to replace it with a spinlock. This patch implements that
replacement to optimize the driver's performance.

Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
---
Note: Build test only.

 drivers/crypto/hisilicon/zip/zip_crypto.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Herbert Xu Aug. 30, 2024, 10:47 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 02:38:56AM +0800, Kuan-Wei Chiu wrote:
> The req_lock is currently implemented as a rw_lock, but there are no
> instances where read_lock() is called. This means that the lock is
> effectively only used by writers, making it functionally equivalent to
> a simple spinlock.
> 
> As stated in Documentation/locking/spinlocks.rst:
> "Reader-writer locks require more atomic memory operations than simple
> spinlocks. Unless the reader critical section is long, you are better
> off just using spinlocks."
> 
> Since the rw_lock in this case incurs additional atomic memory
> operations without any benefit from reader-writer locking, it is more
> efficient to replace it with a spinlock. This patch implements that
> replacement to optimize the driver's performance.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
> ---
> Note: Build test only.
> 
>  drivers/crypto/hisilicon/zip/zip_crypto.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Patch applied.  Thanks.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/zip/zip_crypto.c b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/zip/zip_crypto.c
index 94e2d66b04b6..92d3bd0dfe1b 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/zip/zip_crypto.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/zip/zip_crypto.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@  struct hisi_zip_req {
 struct hisi_zip_req_q {
 	struct hisi_zip_req *q;
 	unsigned long *req_bitmap;
-	rwlock_t req_lock;
+	spinlock_t req_lock;
 	u16 size;
 };
 
@@ -116,17 +116,17 @@  static struct hisi_zip_req *hisi_zip_create_req(struct hisi_zip_qp_ctx *qp_ctx,
 	struct hisi_zip_req *req_cache;
 	int req_id;
 
-	write_lock(&req_q->req_lock);
+	spin_lock(&req_q->req_lock);
 
 	req_id = find_first_zero_bit(req_q->req_bitmap, req_q->size);
 	if (req_id >= req_q->size) {
-		write_unlock(&req_q->req_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&req_q->req_lock);
 		dev_dbg(&qp_ctx->qp->qm->pdev->dev, "req cache is full!\n");
 		return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
 	}
 	set_bit(req_id, req_q->req_bitmap);
 
-	write_unlock(&req_q->req_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&req_q->req_lock);
 
 	req_cache = q + req_id;
 	req_cache->req_id = req_id;
@@ -140,9 +140,9 @@  static void hisi_zip_remove_req(struct hisi_zip_qp_ctx *qp_ctx,
 {
 	struct hisi_zip_req_q *req_q = &qp_ctx->req_q;
 
-	write_lock(&req_q->req_lock);
+	spin_lock(&req_q->req_lock);
 	clear_bit(req->req_id, req_q->req_bitmap);
-	write_unlock(&req_q->req_lock);
+	spin_unlock(&req_q->req_lock);
 }
 
 static void hisi_zip_fill_addr(struct hisi_zip_sqe *sqe, struct hisi_zip_req *req)
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@  static int hisi_zip_create_req_q(struct hisi_zip_ctx *ctx)
 
 			goto err_free_comp_q;
 		}
-		rwlock_init(&req_q->req_lock);
+		spin_lock_init(&req_q->req_lock);
 
 		req_q->q = kcalloc(req_q->size, sizeof(struct hisi_zip_req),
 				   GFP_KERNEL);