diff mbox series

[3/3] gpio: sim: use devm_mutex_init()

Message ID 20240610140548.35358-4-brgl@bgdev.pl
State New
Headers show
Series [1/3] gpio: sim: use device_match_name() instead of strcmp(dev_name(... | expand

Commit Message

Bartosz Golaszewski June 10, 2024, 2:05 p.m. UTC 
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

Drop the hand-coded devres action callback for destroying the mutex in
favor of devm_mutex_init().

Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c | 11 +----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Bartosz Golaszewski June 10, 2024, 3:31 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 at 17:24, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 5:05 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> >
> > Drop the hand-coded devres action callback for destroying the mutex in
> > favor of devm_mutex_init().
>
> All three LGTM,

Can you leave your tags under the cover letter in such cases? This
will make b4 pick it up for all patches automatically.

Thanks,
Bart

> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> Thanks!
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
index 21ad8d87ef04..4157735ea791 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
@@ -308,13 +308,6 @@  static ssize_t gpio_sim_sysfs_pull_store(struct device *dev,
 	return len;
 }
 
-static void gpio_sim_mutex_destroy(void *data)
-{
-	struct mutex *lock = data;
-
-	mutex_destroy(lock);
-}
-
 static void gpio_sim_put_device(void *data)
 {
 	struct device *dev = data;
@@ -458,9 +451,7 @@  static int gpio_sim_add_bank(struct fwnode_handle *swnode, struct device *dev)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	mutex_init(&chip->lock);
-	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, gpio_sim_mutex_destroy,
-				       &chip->lock);
+	ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &chip->lock);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;