diff mbox series

[v3,26/26] media: dvb-frontends: tda10048: Make the range of z explicit.

Message ID 20240429-fix-cocci-v3-26-3c4865f5a4b0@chromium.org
State New
Headers show
Series media: Fix coccinelle warning/errors | expand

Commit Message

Ricardo Ribalda April 29, 2024, 3:05 p.m. UTC
We do not expect the sample_freq to be over 613MHz.

Found by cocci:
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c:345:1-7: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Mauro Carvalho Chehab May 3, 2024, 10:27 a.m. UTC | #1
Em Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:05:05 +0000
Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> escreveu:

> We do not expect the sample_freq to be over 613MHz.
> 
> Found by cocci:
> drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c:345:1-7: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> index 3e725cdcc66b..1886f733dbbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
>  			     u32 bw)
>  {
>  	struct tda10048_state *state = fe->demodulator_priv;
> -	u64 t, z;
> +	u32 z;
> +	u64 t;
>  
>  	dprintk(1, "%s()\n", __func__);
>  
> @@ -341,6 +342,7 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
>  	/* t *= 2147483648 on 32bit platforms */
>  	t *= (2048 * 1024);
>  	t *= 1024;
> +	/* Sample frequency is under 613MHz */

Are you sure about that? Some DVB devices have very high frequency 
clocks, specially if they're also used for satellite, so I can't
be sure by just looking at the driver's code.

Also, we had already a bunch of regressions with "fixes" like this
that actually broke frontend drivers.

If you're sure, please add a note at the description mentioning 
on what part of the datasheet you got it.

Otherwise, let's stick with the current code and address cocci
warning on a different way.

Regards,
Mauro

PS.: I partially applied this patch series. I left a few
patches out of the merge to let other people review/comment
(and/or for me to take a deeper look later on).

Regards,
Mauro
Dan Carpenter May 3, 2024, 11:55 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 11:27:58AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:05:05 +0000
> Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> escreveu:
> 
> > We do not expect the sample_freq to be over 613MHz.
> > 
> > Found by cocci:
> > drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c:345:1-7: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> > index 3e725cdcc66b..1886f733dbbf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> > @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
> >  			     u32 bw)
> >  {
> >  	struct tda10048_state *state = fe->demodulator_priv;
> > -	u64 t, z;
> > +	u32 z;
> > +	u64 t;
> >  
> >  	dprintk(1, "%s()\n", __func__);
> >  
> > @@ -341,6 +342,7 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
> >  	/* t *= 2147483648 on 32bit platforms */
> >  	t *= (2048 * 1024);
> >  	t *= 1024;
> > +	/* Sample frequency is under 613MHz */
> 
> Are you sure about that? Some DVB devices have very high frequency 
> clocks, specially if they're also used for satellite, so I can't
> be sure by just looking at the driver's code.
> 
> Also, we had already a bunch of regressions with "fixes" like this
> that actually broke frontend drivers.

This patch preserves the existing behavior. The sample_freq_hz variable
is a u32 so, in the original code, z couldn't have been more than
U32_MAX even though it was declared as a u64.

It's possible that the original code was wrong.  We have seen that in
other places in this patchset.  Adding a note about the datasheet is
also a good idea.

regards,
dan carpenter
Ricardo Ribalda May 3, 2024, 11:56 a.m. UTC | #3
I am trying to get the DS, but
https://www.nxp.com/acrobat_download/literature/9397/75015931.pdf is a
dead links now.

Anyone have access to the datasheet?

Thanks!

On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 13:55, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 11:27:58AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:05:05 +0000
> > Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> escreveu:
> >
> > > We do not expect the sample_freq to be over 613MHz.
> > >
> > > Found by cocci:
> > > drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c:345:1-7: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c | 4 +++-
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> > > index 3e725cdcc66b..1886f733dbbf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> > > @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
> > >                          u32 bw)
> > >  {
> > >     struct tda10048_state *state = fe->demodulator_priv;
> > > -   u64 t, z;
> > > +   u32 z;
> > > +   u64 t;
> > >
> > >     dprintk(1, "%s()\n", __func__);
> > >
> > > @@ -341,6 +342,7 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
> > >     /* t *= 2147483648 on 32bit platforms */
> > >     t *= (2048 * 1024);
> > >     t *= 1024;
> > > +   /* Sample frequency is under 613MHz */
> >
> > Are you sure about that? Some DVB devices have very high frequency
> > clocks, specially if they're also used for satellite, so I can't
> > be sure by just looking at the driver's code.
> >
> > Also, we had already a bunch of regressions with "fixes" like this
> > that actually broke frontend drivers.
>
> This patch preserves the existing behavior. The sample_freq_hz variable
> is a u32 so, in the original code, z couldn't have been more than
> U32_MAX even though it was declared as a u64.
>
> It's possible that the original code was wrong.  We have seen that in
> other places in this patchset.  Adding a note about the datasheet is
> also a good idea.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Dragan Simic May 3, 2024, 2:08 p.m. UTC | #4
Hello Ricardo,

On 2024-05-03 13:56, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> I am trying to get the DS, but
> https://www.nxp.com/acrobat_download/literature/9397/75015931.pdf is a
> dead links now.
> 
> Anyone have access to the datasheet?

It's kind of available on the link below, but for some strange reason
the download fails after downloading the first 128 KB or so.

https://web.archive.org/web/20080907185532/https://www.nxp.com/acrobat_download/literature/9397/75015931.pdf


> On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 13:55, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> 
> wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 11:27:58AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> > Em Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:05:05 +0000
>> > Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> escreveu:
>> >
>> > > We do not expect the sample_freq to be over 613MHz.
>> > >
>> > > Found by cocci:
>> > > drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c:345:1-7: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
>> > > ---
>> > >  drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c | 4 +++-
>> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
>> > > index 3e725cdcc66b..1886f733dbbf 100644
>> > > --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
>> > > @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
>> > >                          u32 bw)
>> > >  {
>> > >     struct tda10048_state *state = fe->demodulator_priv;
>> > > -   u64 t, z;
>> > > +   u32 z;
>> > > +   u64 t;
>> > >
>> > >     dprintk(1, "%s()\n", __func__);
>> > >
>> > > @@ -341,6 +342,7 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
>> > >     /* t *= 2147483648 on 32bit platforms */
>> > >     t *= (2048 * 1024);
>> > >     t *= 1024;
>> > > +   /* Sample frequency is under 613MHz */
>> >
>> > Are you sure about that? Some DVB devices have very high frequency
>> > clocks, specially if they're also used for satellite, so I can't
>> > be sure by just looking at the driver's code.
>> >
>> > Also, we had already a bunch of regressions with "fixes" like this
>> > that actually broke frontend drivers.
>> 
>> This patch preserves the existing behavior. The sample_freq_hz 
>> variable
>> is a u32 so, in the original code, z couldn't have been more than
>> U32_MAX even though it was declared as a u64.
>> 
>> It's possible that the original code was wrong.  We have seen that in
>> other places in this patchset.  Adding a note about the datasheet is
>> also a good idea.
>> 
>> regards,
>> dan carpenter
>>
Ricardo Ribalda May 13, 2024, 1:35 p.m. UTC | #5
On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 16:08, Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hello Ricardo,
>
> On 2024-05-03 13:56, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > I am trying to get the DS, but
> > https://www.nxp.com/acrobat_download/literature/9397/75015931.pdf is a
> > dead links now.
> >
> > Anyone have access to the datasheet?
>
> It's kind of available on the link below, but for some strange reason
> the download fails after downloading the first 128 KB or so.
>
> https://web.archive.org/web/20080907185532/https://www.nxp.com/acrobat_download/literature/9397/75015931.pdf\

Mike, by any chance do you have a copy of the DS?


>
>
> > On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 13:55, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 11:27:58AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> > Em Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:05:05 +0000
> >> > Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> escreveu:
> >> >
> >> > > We do not expect the sample_freq to be over 613MHz.
> >> > >
> >> > > Found by cocci:
> >> > > drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c:345:1-7: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
> >> > >
> >> > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
> >> > > ---
> >> > >  drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c | 4 +++-
> >> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> > >
> >> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> >> > > index 3e725cdcc66b..1886f733dbbf 100644
> >> > > --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> >> > > +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> >> > > @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
> >> > >                          u32 bw)
> >> > >  {
> >> > >     struct tda10048_state *state = fe->demodulator_priv;
> >> > > -   u64 t, z;
> >> > > +   u32 z;
> >> > > +   u64 t;
> >> > >
> >> > >     dprintk(1, "%s()\n", __func__);
> >> > >
> >> > > @@ -341,6 +342,7 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
> >> > >     /* t *= 2147483648 on 32bit platforms */
> >> > >     t *= (2048 * 1024);
> >> > >     t *= 1024;
> >> > > +   /* Sample frequency is under 613MHz */
> >> >
> >> > Are you sure about that? Some DVB devices have very high frequency
> >> > clocks, specially if they're also used for satellite, so I can't
> >> > be sure by just looking at the driver's code.
> >> >
> >> > Also, we had already a bunch of regressions with "fixes" like this
> >> > that actually broke frontend drivers.
> >>
> >> This patch preserves the existing behavior. The sample_freq_hz
> >> variable
> >> is a u32 so, in the original code, z couldn't have been more than
> >> U32_MAX even though it was declared as a u64.


I agree with Dan, we keep the existing behaviour. So it wont hurt to
merge the code...

All  that said, if someone has access to the DS, I do not mind reviewing it.


> >>
> >> It's possible that the original code was wrong.  We have seen that in
> >> other places in this patchset.  Adding a note about the datasheet is
> >> also a good idea.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> dan carpenter
> >>
Michael Ira Krufky May 13, 2024, 2:25 p.m. UTC | #6
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 9:38 AM Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 16:08, Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Ricardo,
> >
> > On 2024-05-03 13:56, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > > I am trying to get the DS, but
> > > https://www.nxp.com/acrobat_download/literature/9397/75015931.pdf is a
> > > dead links now.
> > >
> > > Anyone have access to the datasheet?
> >
> > It's kind of available on the link below, but for some strange reason
> > the download fails after downloading the first 128 KB or so.
> >
> > https://web.archive.org/web/20080907185532/https://www.nxp.com/acrobat_download/literature/9397/75015931.pdf\
>
> Mike, by any chance do you have a copy of the DS?
>
>
> >
> >
> > > On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 13:55, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 11:27:58AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > >> > Em Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:05:05 +0000
> > >> > Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> escreveu:
> > >> >
> > >> > > We do not expect the sample_freq to be over 613MHz.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Found by cocci:
> > >> > > drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c:345:1-7: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
> > >> > > ---
> > >> > >  drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c | 4 +++-
> > >> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >> > >
> > >> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> > >> > > index 3e725cdcc66b..1886f733dbbf 100644
> > >> > > --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> > >> > > +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> > >> > > @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
> > >> > >                          u32 bw)
> > >> > >  {
> > >> > >     struct tda10048_state *state = fe->demodulator_priv;
> > >> > > -   u64 t, z;
> > >> > > +   u32 z;
> > >> > > +   u64 t;
> > >> > >
> > >> > >     dprintk(1, "%s()\n", __func__);
> > >> > >
> > >> > > @@ -341,6 +342,7 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
> > >> > >     /* t *= 2147483648 on 32bit platforms */
> > >> > >     t *= (2048 * 1024);
> > >> > >     t *= 1024;
> > >> > > +   /* Sample frequency is under 613MHz */
> > >> >
> > >> > Are you sure about that? Some DVB devices have very high frequency
> > >> > clocks, specially if they're also used for satellite, so I can't
> > >> > be sure by just looking at the driver's code.
> > >> >
> > >> > Also, we had already a bunch of regressions with "fixes" like this
> > >> > that actually broke frontend drivers.
> > >>
> > >> This patch preserves the existing behavior. The sample_freq_hz
> > >> variable
> > >> is a u32 so, in the original code, z couldn't have been more than
> > >> U32_MAX even though it was declared as a u64.
>
>
> I agree with Dan, we keep the existing behaviour. So it wont hurt to
> merge the code...
>
> All  that said, if someone has access to the DS, I do not mind reviewing it.
>
>
> > >>
> > >> It's possible that the original code was wrong.  We have seen that in
> > >> other places in this patchset.  Adding a note about the datasheet is
> > >> also a good idea.
> > >>
> > >> regards,
> > >> dan carpenter
> > >>
>
>
>
> --
> Ricardo Ribalda
>

Nice to hear from you!  :-)

I believe that I may have a copy of it on an old "spinny" hard drive
somewhere in one of the ancient desktop computers I have lining my
basement walls, lol.  It will take me some time to locate it.  I hope
this isn't urgent o:-)

...It so happens that the dev box I used when I worked on that driver
is up right now, but the datasheet isn't in my home directory.  There
are two other drives in the chassis but not connected / powered - I'll
give these a look and let you know if I find anything.

Best,
Michael Krufky
Ricardo Ribalda Aug. 9, 2024, 8:02 a.m. UTC | #7
Hi

It does not seem that we will find the datasheet.

Any objection to land the patch as it? It is as incorrect as the
original code ;)

Regards!

On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 16:26, Michael Ira Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 9:38 AM Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 16:08, Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Ricardo,
> > >
> > > On 2024-05-03 13:56, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > > > I am trying to get the DS, but
> > > > https://www.nxp.com/acrobat_download/literature/9397/75015931.pdf is a
> > > > dead links now.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone have access to the datasheet?
> > >
> > > It's kind of available on the link below, but for some strange reason
> > > the download fails after downloading the first 128 KB or so.
> > >
> > > https://web.archive.org/web/20080907185532/https://www.nxp.com/acrobat_download/literature/9397/75015931.pdf\
> >
> > Mike, by any chance do you have a copy of the DS?
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 13:55, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 11:27:58AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > >> > Em Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:05:05 +0000
> > > >> > Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org> escreveu:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > We do not expect the sample_freq to be over 613MHz.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Found by cocci:
> > > >> > > drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c:345:1-7: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
> > > >> > > ---
> > > >> > >  drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c | 4 +++-
> > > >> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> > > >> > > index 3e725cdcc66b..1886f733dbbf 100644
> > > >> > > --- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> > > >> > > +++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
> > > >> > > @@ -328,7 +328,8 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
> > > >> > >                          u32 bw)
> > > >> > >  {
> > > >> > >     struct tda10048_state *state = fe->demodulator_priv;
> > > >> > > -   u64 t, z;
> > > >> > > +   u32 z;
> > > >> > > +   u64 t;
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >     dprintk(1, "%s()\n", __func__);
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > @@ -341,6 +342,7 @@ static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
> > > >> > >     /* t *= 2147483648 on 32bit platforms */
> > > >> > >     t *= (2048 * 1024);
> > > >> > >     t *= 1024;
> > > >> > > +   /* Sample frequency is under 613MHz */
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Are you sure about that? Some DVB devices have very high frequency
> > > >> > clocks, specially if they're also used for satellite, so I can't
> > > >> > be sure by just looking at the driver's code.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Also, we had already a bunch of regressions with "fixes" like this
> > > >> > that actually broke frontend drivers.
> > > >>
> > > >> This patch preserves the existing behavior. The sample_freq_hz
> > > >> variable
> > > >> is a u32 so, in the original code, z couldn't have been more than
> > > >> U32_MAX even though it was declared as a u64.
> >
> >
> > I agree with Dan, we keep the existing behaviour. So it wont hurt to
> > merge the code...
> >
> > All  that said, if someone has access to the DS, I do not mind reviewing it.
> >
> >
> > > >>
> > > >> It's possible that the original code was wrong.  We have seen that in
> > > >> other places in this patchset.  Adding a note about the datasheet is
> > > >> also a good idea.
> > > >>
> > > >> regards,
> > > >> dan carpenter
> > > >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ricardo Ribalda
> >
>
> Nice to hear from you!  :-)
>
> I believe that I may have a copy of it on an old "spinny" hard drive
> somewhere in one of the ancient desktop computers I have lining my
> basement walls, lol.  It will take me some time to locate it.  I hope
> this isn't urgent o:-)
>
> ...It so happens that the dev box I used when I worked on that driver
> is up right now, but the datasheet isn't in my home directory.  There
> are two other drives in the chassis but not connected / powered - I'll
> give these a look and let you know if I find anything.
>
> Best,
> Michael Krufky
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
index 3e725cdcc66b..1886f733dbbf 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/tda10048.c
@@ -328,7 +328,8 @@  static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
 			     u32 bw)
 {
 	struct tda10048_state *state = fe->demodulator_priv;
-	u64 t, z;
+	u32 z;
+	u64 t;
 
 	dprintk(1, "%s()\n", __func__);
 
@@ -341,6 +342,7 @@  static int tda10048_set_wref(struct dvb_frontend *fe, u32 sample_freq_hz,
 	/* t *= 2147483648 on 32bit platforms */
 	t *= (2048 * 1024);
 	t *= 1024;
+	/* Sample frequency is under 613MHz */
 	z = 7 * sample_freq_hz;
 	do_div(t, z);
 	t += 5;