diff mbox series

[v5,1/3] riscv: cacheinfo: remove the useless input parameter (node) of ci_leaf_init()

Message ID 20240509073300.4968-1-cuiyunhui@bytedance.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [v5,1/3] riscv: cacheinfo: remove the useless input parameter (node) of ci_leaf_init() | expand

Commit Message

Yunhui Cui May 9, 2024, 7:32 a.m. UTC
ci_leaf_init() is a declared static function. The implementation of the
function body and the caller do not use the parameter (struct device_node
*node) input parameter, so remove it.

Fixes: 6a24915145c9 ("Revert "riscv: Set more data to cacheinfo"")
Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Jeremy Linton May 9, 2024, 3:09 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On 5/9/24 02:32, Yunhui Cui wrote:
> Before cacheinfo can be built correctly, we need to initialize level
> and type. Since RISC-V currently does not have a register group that
> describes cache-related attributes like ARM64, we cannot obtain them
> directly, so now we obtain cache leaves from the ACPI PPTT table
> (acpi_get_cache_info()) and set the cache type through split_levels.
> 
> Suggested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> Suggested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com>
> ---
>   arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> index 30a6878287ad..d6c108c50cba 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>    * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive
>    */
>   
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>   #include <linux/cpu.h>
>   #include <linux/of.h>
>   #include <asm/cacheinfo.h>
> @@ -78,6 +79,27 @@ int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
>   	struct device_node *prev = NULL;
>   	int levels = 1, level = 1;
>   
> +	if (!acpi_disabled) {
> +		int ret, fw_levels, split_levels;
> +
> +		ret = acpi_get_cache_info(cpu, &fw_levels, &split_levels);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		BUG_ON((split_levels > fw_levels) ||
> +		       (split_levels + fw_levels > this_cpu_ci->num_leaves));
> +
> +		for (; level <= this_cpu_ci->num_levels; level++) {
> +			if (level <= split_levels) {
> +				ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level);
> +				ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_INST, level);
> +			} else {
> +				ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level);
> +			}
> +		}
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size"))
>   		ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level);
>   	if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size"))


Yes, still looks good.

Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>

Thanks,
Yunhui Cui May 10, 2024, 9:09 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Palmer,

There are already related Reviewed-by, Gentle ping...

On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 11:27 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 03:32:59PM +0800, Yunhui Cui wrote:
> > Before cacheinfo can be built correctly, we need to initialize level
> > and type. Since RISC-V currently does not have a register group that
> > describes cache-related attributes like ARM64, we cannot obtain them
> > directly, so now we obtain cache leaves from the ACPI PPTT table
> > (acpi_get_cache_info()) and set the cache type through split_levels.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> > Suggested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>
> I am not sure why you have not added my reviewed-by as I was happy with
> v3 onwards IIRC. Anyways, I will give it again 😄
>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep

Thanks,
Yunhui
Yunhui Cui May 16, 2024, 2:44 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Palmer,

Gentle ping ...

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 5:09 PM yunhui cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Palmer,
>
> There are already related Reviewed-by, Gentle ping...
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 11:27 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 03:32:59PM +0800, Yunhui Cui wrote:
> > > Before cacheinfo can be built correctly, we need to initialize level
> > > and type. Since RISC-V currently does not have a register group that
> > > describes cache-related attributes like ARM64, we cannot obtain them
> > > directly, so now we obtain cache leaves from the ACPI PPTT table
> > > (acpi_get_cache_info()) and set the cache type through split_levels.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> >
> > I am not sure why you have not added my reviewed-by as I was happy with
> > v3 onwards IIRC. Anyways, I will give it again 😄
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Sudeep
>
> Thanks,
> Yunhui

Thanks,
Yunhui
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
index 09e9b88110d1..30a6878287ad 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@  uintptr_t get_cache_geometry(u32 level, enum cache_type type)
 }
 
 static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
-			 struct device_node *node,
 			 enum cache_type type, unsigned int level)
 {
 	this_leaf->level = level;
@@ -80,11 +79,11 @@  int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
 	int levels = 1, level = 1;
 
 	if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size"))
-		ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level);
+		ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level);
 	if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size"))
-		ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_INST, level);
+		ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_INST, level);
 	if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size"))
-		ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level);
+		ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level);
 
 	prev = np;
 	while ((np = of_find_next_cache_node(np))) {
@@ -97,11 +96,11 @@  int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
 		if (level <= levels)
 			break;
 		if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size"))
-			ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level);
+			ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level);
 		if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size"))
-			ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_INST, level);
+			ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_INST, level);
 		if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size"))
-			ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level);
+			ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level);
 		levels = level;
 	}
 	of_node_put(np);