diff mbox series

powerpc: include linux/backlight.h from asm/backlight.h

Message ID 20240304095512.742348-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
State New
Headers show
Series powerpc: include linux/backlight.h from asm/backlight.h | expand

Commit Message

Jani Nikula March 4, 2024, 9:55 a.m. UTC
Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.

Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in header")
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

---

Not even compile tested!
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Jani Nikula March 4, 2024, 10:01 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 04 Mar 2024, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
> dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
>
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
> Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in header")
> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
> Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> ---
>
> Not even compile tested!

Naresh, please try this patch!

Michael, if this is fine by you, ack to merge via the drm subsystem
along with the regressing commit?

BR,
Jani.

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
>  
> +#include <linux/backlight.h>
>  #include <linux/fb.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
Naresh Kamboju March 4, 2024, 2:55 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Jani and Benjamin,

On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 15:31, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2024, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> > Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
> > dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
> >
> > Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
> > Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in header")
> > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> > Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
> > Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Not even compile tested!
>
> Naresh, please try this patch!

Thanks for the proposed fix patch.

Steps to reproduce:

# tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch powerpc --toolchain gcc-13
--kconfig ppc6xx_defconfig --kconfig-add CONFIG_PMAC_BACKLIGHT=y
config debugkernel dtbs kernel modules xipkernel

# Applying patch set
Applying: fbdev/chipsfb: Include <linux/backlight.h>

The reported build regression is fixed but build failed with below errors.

My two cents,

I should have copied the full build error log in the morning.

Few more build errors on powerpc builds,
------------------
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c: In function
'__pmu_backlight_update_status':
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:74:21: error: implicit
declaration of function 'backlight_get_brightness'; did you mean
'pmu_backlight_get_level_brightness'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   74 |         int level = backlight_get_brightness(bd);
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                     pmu_backlight_get_level_brightness
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c: At top level:
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:108:21: error: variable
'pmu_backlight_data' has initializer but incomplete type
  108 | static const struct backlight_ops pmu_backlight_data = {
      |                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:109:10: error: 'const struct
backlight_ops' has no member named 'update_status'
  109 |         .update_status  = pmu_backlight_update_status,
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:109:27: warning: excess elements
in struct initializer
  109 |         .update_status  = pmu_backlight_update_status,
      |                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:109:27: note: (near
initialization for 'pmu_backlight_data')
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c: In function 'pmu_backlight_init':
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:136:37: error: storage size of
'props' isn't known
  136 |         struct backlight_properties props;
      |                                     ^~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:154:34: error: invalid
application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct
backlight_properties'
  154 |         memset(&props, 0, sizeof(struct backlight_properties));
      |                                  ^~~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:155:22: error:
'BACKLIGHT_PLATFORM' undeclared (first use in this function)
  155 |         props.type = BACKLIGHT_PLATFORM;
      |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:155:22: note: each undeclared
identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:157:14: error: implicit
declaration of function 'backlight_device_register'; did you mean
'root_device_register'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  157 |         bd = backlight_device_register(name, NULL, NULL,
&pmu_backlight_data,
      |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |              root_device_register
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:166:19: error: invalid use of
undefined type 'struct backlight_device'
  166 |         level = bd->props.max_brightness;
      |                   ^~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:176:35: error: invalid use of
undefined type 'struct backlight_device'
  176 |                                 bd->props.max_brightness / 15);
      |                                   ^~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:179:11: error: invalid use of
undefined type 'struct backlight_device'
  179 |         bd->props.brightness = level;
      |           ^~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:180:11: error: invalid use of
undefined type 'struct backlight_device'
  180 |         bd->props.power = FB_BLANK_UNBLANK;
      |           ^~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:181:9: error: implicit
declaration of function 'backlight_update_status'; did you mean
'pmu_backlight_update_status'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  181 |         backlight_update_status(bd);
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |         pmu_backlight_update_status
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:136:37: warning: unused variable
'props' [-Wunused-variable]
  136 |         struct backlight_properties props;
      |                                     ^~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c: At top level:
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:108:35: error: storage size of
'pmu_backlight_data' isn't known
  108 | static const struct backlight_ops pmu_backlight_data = {
      |                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.c:108:35: error: storage size of
'pmu_backlight_data' isn't known
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244:
drivers/macintosh/via-pmu-backlight.o] Error 1


Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>



> Michael, if this is fine by you, ack to merge via the drm subsystem
> along with the regressing commit?
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> > index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> >  #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
> >  #ifdef __KERNEL__
> >
> > +#include <linux/backlight.h>
> >  #include <linux/fb.h>
> >  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
Christophe Leroy March 4, 2024, 6:13 p.m. UTC | #3
Le 04/03/2024 à 11:32, Thomas Zimmermann a écrit :
> Hi
> 
> Am 04.03.24 um 10:55 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>> Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
>> dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
>>
>> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
>> Closes: 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
>> Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in 
>> header")
>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>> Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Not even compile tested!
> 
> That's one of the cases that's hard to catch unless you get the config 
> right.
> 
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h 
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>> index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>   #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
>>   #ifdef __KERNEL__
>> +#include <linux/backlight.h>
> 
> Thanks, but I think this should go directly into chipsfb.c. I would have 
> provided a patch already, if our mail server didn't have issues this 
> morning. Let me try again.

asm/backlight.h needs it for struct backlight_device

At least if you don't want to include linux/backlight.h in 
asm/backlight.h, then you need a forward declaration of struct 
backlight_device;

> 
> Best regards
> Thomas
> 
>>   #include <linux/fb.h>
>>   #include <linux/mutex.h>
>
Michael Ellerman March 5, 2024, 12:36 a.m. UTC | #4
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> Le 04/03/2024 à 11:32, Thomas Zimmermann a écrit :
>> Hi
>> 
>> Am 04.03.24 um 10:55 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>>> Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
>>> dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
>>> Closes: 
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
>>> Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in 
>>> header")
>>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>>> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>>> Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Not even compile tested!
>> 
>> That's one of the cases that's hard to catch unless you get the config 
>> right.
>> 
>>> ---
>>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h 
>>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>>   #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
>>>   #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>> +#include <linux/backlight.h>
>> 
>> Thanks, but I think this should go directly into chipsfb.c. I would have 
>> provided a patch already, if our mail server didn't have issues this 
>> morning. Let me try again.
>
> asm/backlight.h needs it for struct backlight_device
>
> At least if you don't want to include linux/backlight.h in 
> asm/backlight.h, then you need a forward declaration of struct 
> backlight_device;

It's preferable for asm headers not to include linux headers (to avoid
loops), so a forward declaration would be better IMHO.

cheers
Michael Ellerman March 5, 2024, 12:39 a.m. UTC | #5
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> writes:
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2024, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
>> Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
>> dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
>>
>> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
>> Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in header")
>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>> Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Not even compile tested!
>
> Naresh, please try this patch!
>
> Michael, if this is fine by you, ack to merge via the drm subsystem
> along with the regressing commit?

I prefer Thomas' patch, but I'm fine with either to go in via drm.

cheers
Thomas Zimmermann March 5, 2024, 8:09 a.m. UTC | #6
Hi

Am 05.03.24 um 01:36 schrieb Michael Ellerman:
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
>> Le 04/03/2024 à 11:32, Thomas Zimmermann a écrit :
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Am 04.03.24 um 10:55 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>>>> Removal of the backlight include from fb.h uncovered an implicit
>>>> dependency in powerpc asm/backlight.h. Add the explicit include.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
>>>> Closes:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+G9fYsAk5TbqqxFC2W4oHLGA0CbTHMxbeq8QayFXTU75YiueA@mail.gmail.com
>>>> Fixes: 11b4eedfc87d ("fbdev: Do not include <linux/backlight.h> in
>>>> header")
>>>> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
>>>> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>>>> Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Not even compile tested!
>>> That's one of the cases that's hard to catch unless you get the config
>>> right.
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h | 1 +
>>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>>> index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
>>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>>>    #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
>>>>    #ifdef __KERNEL__
>>>> +#include <linux/backlight.h>
>>> Thanks, but I think this should go directly into chipsfb.c. I would have
>>> provided a patch already, if our mail server didn't have issues this
>>> morning. Let me try again.
>> asm/backlight.h needs it for struct backlight_device
>>
>> At least if you don't want to include linux/backlight.h in
>> asm/backlight.h, then you need a forward declaration of struct
>> backlight_device;
> It's preferable for asm headers not to include linux headers (to avoid
> loops), so a forward declaration would be better IMHO.

The asm header shouldn't include <linux/fb.h> either. I'll send an 
update to my patch to clean up everything.

Best regards
Thomas

>
> cheers
Jani Nikula March 5, 2024, 8:19 a.m. UTC | #7
On Tue, 05 Mar 2024, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> I prefer Thomas' patch, but I'm fine with either to go in via drm.

Thanks!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
index 1b5eab62ed04..275d5bb9aa04 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/backlight.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ 
 #define __ASM_POWERPC_BACKLIGHT_H
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 
+#include <linux/backlight.h>
 #include <linux/fb.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>