Message ID | d5059986-0329-4e6a-a7a5-30da8ebd58a9@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] media: atomisp: Changes for 6.8-1 | expand |
Hi, On 2/1/24 07:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Sun, 31 Dec 2023 11:39:18 +0100 > Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> escreveu: > >> Hi Mauro, >> >> Here are the atomisp changes for 6.8. >> >> My patches in this set been posted on the list, but only a couple of >> minutes ago, leaving pretty much zero time for review. Sorry about that, >> with the holidays the timing did not work out very well. >> >> If you don't want to take this pull-request because of this it >> would be good if you can at least take the patches up to >> the "media: atomisp: Fix spelling mistake in ia_css_acc_types.h" >> change. There are only 2 unreviewed patches from me in that >> set, which fix the atomisp driver not working at all with >> the latest media_stage/master code. And the rest of the patches >> in that set are from others and have been reviewed by me. > > We typically close the media merge window at -rc6. As I was also > in vacations during those weeks, this PR was merged today for 6.9. No problem, I know I was late with submitting this PR. > Indeed the first two patches seem to be needed to fix an issue on 6.8. > Could you please send them to stable after their arrival at linux-next? I'm not sure what you mean with send them to stable ? 6.8 is not released yet, so these need to be send to Linus this cycle. What is the process for media bugfixes for the current kernel cycle ? Regards, Hans
Em Thu, 1 Feb 2024 12:46:19 +0100 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> escreveu: > Hi, > > On 2/1/24 07:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Sun, 31 Dec 2023 11:39:18 +0100 > > Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> escreveu: > > > >> Hi Mauro, > >> > >> Here are the atomisp changes for 6.8. > >> > >> My patches in this set been posted on the list, but only a couple of > >> minutes ago, leaving pretty much zero time for review. Sorry about that, > >> with the holidays the timing did not work out very well. > >> > >> If you don't want to take this pull-request because of this it > >> would be good if you can at least take the patches up to > >> the "media: atomisp: Fix spelling mistake in ia_css_acc_types.h" > >> change. There are only 2 unreviewed patches from me in that > >> set, which fix the atomisp driver not working at all with > >> the latest media_stage/master code. And the rest of the patches > >> in that set are from others and have been reviewed by me. > > > > We typically close the media merge window at -rc6. As I was also > > in vacations during those weeks, this PR was merged today for 6.9. > > No problem, I know I was late with submitting this PR. > > > Indeed the first two patches seem to be needed to fix an issue on 6.8. > > Could you please send them to stable after their arrival at linux-next? > > I'm not sure what you mean with send them to stable ? > > 6.8 is not released yet, so these need to be send to Linus this > cycle. What is the process for media bugfixes for the current > kernel cycle ? Heh, sorry, somehow I was thinking on 6.7 :-) If the bug only happens on 6.8, I can just cherry-pick the two patches on my fixes branch. Thanks, Mauro
Hi, On 2/1/24 13:18, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Thu, 1 Feb 2024 12:46:19 +0100 > Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> escreveu: > >> Hi, >> >> On 2/1/24 07:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >>> Em Sun, 31 Dec 2023 11:39:18 +0100 >>> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> escreveu: >>> >>>> Hi Mauro, >>>> >>>> Here are the atomisp changes for 6.8. >>>> >>>> My patches in this set been posted on the list, but only a couple of >>>> minutes ago, leaving pretty much zero time for review. Sorry about that, >>>> with the holidays the timing did not work out very well. >>>> >>>> If you don't want to take this pull-request because of this it >>>> would be good if you can at least take the patches up to >>>> the "media: atomisp: Fix spelling mistake in ia_css_acc_types.h" >>>> change. There are only 2 unreviewed patches from me in that >>>> set, which fix the atomisp driver not working at all with >>>> the latest media_stage/master code. And the rest of the patches >>>> in that set are from others and have been reviewed by me. >>> >>> We typically close the media merge window at -rc6. As I was also >>> in vacations during those weeks, this PR was merged today for 6.9. >> >> No problem, I know I was late with submitting this PR. >> >>> Indeed the first two patches seem to be needed to fix an issue on 6.8. >>> Could you please send them to stable after their arrival at linux-next? >> >> I'm not sure what you mean with send them to stable ? >> >> 6.8 is not released yet, so these need to be send to Linus this >> cycle. What is the process for media bugfixes for the current >> kernel cycle ? > > Heh, sorry, somehow I was thinking on 6.7 :-) > > If the bug only happens on 6.8, I can just cherry-pick the two patches > on my fixes branch. I believe you only need: "media: atomisp: Adjust for v4l2_subdev_state handling changes in 6.8" And as the subject says, that is a fix for 6.8, 6.7 is fine AFAIK. Thanks & Regards, Hans