Message ID | 20240106-w1-uart-v4-0-7fe1378a8b3e@gmail.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | w1: add UART w1 bus driver | expand |
On 06/01/2024 17:02, Christoph Winklhofer via B4 Relay wrote: > Hello! > > This patch contains a driver for a 1-Wire bus over UART. The driver > utilizes the UART interface via the Serial Device Bus to create the > 1-Wire timing patterns. > > Changes in v4: > - rework baud-rate configuration: also check max bit-time, support higher > baud-rates by adding a delay to complete 1-Wire cycle. > - dt-binding w1-uart: specify baud-rates for 1-Wire operations > - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240105-w1-uart-v3-0-8687093b2e76@gmail.com > You can slow down a bit. You sent v2 too late to be applied. Then you sent v3 and next day v4. While I like approach to release early, release often, it does not necessarily apply to the bindings. Bindings should be complete, which means they should describe the hardware as fully as possible. About the driver, you can develop it incrementally, it is a good idea, however since ~rc6 my w1 tree is closed. It will remain closed till next rc1 is released (merge window finished). Nothing will get applied during that time, so if you intend to add new features, better to send v5 after the merge window (instead v4 now, v5 tomorrow, v6 next week and then v7 after rc1). Best regards, Krzysztof
On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 05:56:34PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 06/01/2024 17:02, Christoph Winklhofer via B4 Relay wrote: > > Hello! > > > > This patch contains a driver for a 1-Wire bus over UART. The driver > > utilizes the UART interface via the Serial Device Bus to create the > > 1-Wire timing patterns. > > > > Changes in v4: > > - rework baud-rate configuration: also check max bit-time, support higher > > baud-rates by adding a delay to complete 1-Wire cycle. > > - dt-binding w1-uart: specify baud-rates for 1-Wire operations > > - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240105-w1-uart-v3-0-8687093b2e76@gmail.com > > > > You can slow down a bit. You sent v2 too late to be applied. Then you > sent v3 and next day v4. > > While I like approach to release early, release often, it does not > necessarily apply to the bindings. Bindings should be complete, which > means they should describe the hardware as fully as possible. > > About the driver, you can develop it incrementally, it is a good idea, > however since ~rc6 my w1 tree is closed. It will remain closed till next > rc1 is released (merge window finished). Nothing will get applied during > that time, so if you intend to add new features, better to send v5 after > the merge window (instead v4 now, v5 tomorrow, v6 next week and then v7 > after rc1). > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > Ok sorry, understood - thank you for the clarification. Kind regards, Christoph
On 06. 01. 24, 17:02, Christoph Winklhofer via B4 Relay wrote: > From: Christoph Winklhofer <cj.winklhofer@gmail.com> > > Add a UART 1-Wire bus driver. The driver utilizes the UART interface via > the Serial Device Bus to create the 1-Wire timing patterns. The driver > was tested on a "Raspberry Pi 3B" with a DS18B20 and on a "Variscite > DART-6UL" with a DS18S20 temperature sensor. > > The 1-Wire timing pattern and the corresponding UART baud-rate with the > interpretation of the transferred bytes are described in the document: > > Link: https://www.analog.com/en/technical-articles/using-a-uart-to-implement-a-1wire-bus-master.html > > In short, the UART peripheral must support full-duplex and operate in > open-drain mode. The timing patterns are generated by a specific > combination of baud-rate and transmitted byte, which corresponds to a > 1-Wire read bit, write bit or reset. ... > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/w1/masters/w1-uart.c > @@ -0,0 +1,398 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > +/* > + * w1-uart - UART 1-Wire bus driver > + * > + * Uses the UART interface (via Serial Device Bus) to create the 1-Wire > + * timing patterns. Implements the following 1-Wire master interface: > + * > + * - reset_bus: requests baud-rate 9600 > + * > + * - touch_bit: requests baud-rate 115200 > + * > + * Author: Christoph Winklhofer <cj.winklhofer@gmail.com> > + */ > + > +#include <linux/completion.h> > +#include <linux/delay.h> > +#include <linux/jiffies.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/mutex.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > +#include <linux/serdev.h> > +#include <linux/w1.h> > + > +#define W1_UART_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(500) > + > +/* > + * struct w1_uart_config - configuration for 1-Wire operation > + * > + * @baudrate: baud-rate returned from serdev > + * @delay_us: delay to complete a 1-Wire cycle (in us) > + * @tx_byte: byte to generate 1-Wire timing pattern > + */ > +struct w1_uart_config { > + unsigned int baudrate; > + unsigned int delay_us; > + unsigned char tx_byte; If it is a "byte", it should be u8. > +}; > + > +struct w1_uart_device { > + struct serdev_device *serdev; > + struct w1_bus_master bus; > + > + struct w1_uart_config cfg_reset; > + struct w1_uart_config cfg_touch_0; > + struct w1_uart_config cfg_touch_1; > + > + struct completion rx_byte_received; > + unsigned char rx_byte; The same here. > + int rx_err; > + > + struct mutex mutex; > +}; > + > +/* > + * struct w1_uart_limits - limits for 1-Wire operations > + * > + * @baudrate: Requested baud-rate to create 1-Wire timing pattern > + * @bit_min_us: minimum time for a bit (in us) > + * @bit_max_us: maximum time for a bit (in us) > + * @sample_us: timespan to sample 1-Wire response > + * @cycle_us: duration of the 1-Wire cycle > + */ > +struct w1_uart_limits { > + unsigned int baudrate; > + unsigned int bit_min_us; > + unsigned int bit_max_us; > + unsigned int sample_us; > + unsigned int cycle_us; > +}; > + > +static inline unsigned int baud_to_bit_ns(unsigned int baud) > +{ > + return 1000000000 / baud; NSEC_PER_SEC > +} > + > +static inline unsigned int to_ns(unsigned int us) > +{ > + return us * 1000; NSEC_PER_USEC > +} > + > +/* > + * Set baud-rate, delay and tx-byte to create a 1-Wire pulse and adapt > + * the tx-byte according to the actual baud-rate. > + * > + * Reject when: > + * - time for a bit outside min/max range > + * - a 1-Wire response is not detectable for sent byte > + */ > +static int w1_uart_set_config(struct serdev_device *serdev, > + const struct w1_uart_limits *limits, > + struct w1_uart_config *w1cfg) > +{ > + unsigned int bits_low; > + unsigned int bit_ns; > + unsigned int low_ns; > + > + w1cfg->baudrate = serdev_device_set_baudrate(serdev, limits->baudrate); > + if (w1cfg->baudrate == 0) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* Compute in nanoseconds for accuracy */ > + bit_ns = baud_to_bit_ns(w1cfg->baudrate); > + bits_low = to_ns(limits->bit_min_us) / bit_ns; > + /* start bit is always low */ > + low_ns = bit_ns * (bits_low + 1); > + > + if (low_ns < to_ns(limits->bit_min_us)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (low_ns > to_ns(limits->bit_max_us)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* 1-Wire response detectable for sent byte */ > + if (limits->sample_us > 0 && > + bit_ns * 8 < low_ns + to_ns(limits->sample_us)) BITS_PER_BYTE > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* delay to complete 1-Wire cycle, include start and stop-bit */ > + w1cfg->delay_us = 0; > + if (bit_ns * 10 < to_ns(limits->cycle_us)) What is this 10? Dub it. > + w1cfg->delay_us = > + (to_ns(limits->cycle_us) - bit_ns * 10) / 1000; And this 10? The end: / NSEC_PER_USEC > + > + /* byte to create 1-Wire pulse */ > + w1cfg->tx_byte = 0xff << bits_low; > + > + return 0; > +} ... > +static int w1_uart_serdev_tx_rx(struct w1_uart_device *w1dev, > + const struct w1_uart_config *w1cfg, > + unsigned char *rx_byte) u8 * > +{ ... > +} > + > +static int w1_uart_serdev_receive_buf(struct serdev_device *serdev, > + const unsigned char *buf, size_t count) serdev already uses u8 * here. You are basing on the top of some old tree. regards,
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 07:18:31AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 06. 01. 24, 17:02, Christoph Winklhofer via B4 Relay wrote: > > From: Christoph Winklhofer <cj.winklhofer@gmail.com> > > > > Add a UART 1-Wire bus driver. The driver utilizes the UART interface via > > the Serial Device Bus to create the 1-Wire timing patterns. The driver > > was tested on a "Raspberry Pi 3B" with a DS18B20 and on a "Variscite > > DART-6UL" with a DS18S20 temperature sensor. > > > > The 1-Wire timing pattern and the corresponding UART baud-rate with the > > interpretation of the transferred bytes are described in the document: > > > > Link: https://www.analog.com/en/technical-articles/using-a-uart-to-implement-a-1wire-bus-master.html > > > > In short, the UART peripheral must support full-duplex and operate in > > open-drain mode. The timing patterns are generated by a specific > > combination of baud-rate and transmitted byte, which corresponds to a > > 1-Wire read bit, write bit or reset. > ... > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/w1/masters/w1-uart.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,398 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later > > +/* > > + * w1-uart - UART 1-Wire bus driver > > + * > > + * Uses the UART interface (via Serial Device Bus) to create the 1-Wire > > + * timing patterns. Implements the following 1-Wire master interface: > > + * > > + * - reset_bus: requests baud-rate 9600 > > + * > > + * - touch_bit: requests baud-rate 115200 > > + * > > + * Author: Christoph Winklhofer <cj.winklhofer@gmail.com> > > + */ > > + > > +#include <linux/completion.h> > > +#include <linux/delay.h> > > +#include <linux/jiffies.h> > > +#include <linux/module.h> > > +#include <linux/mutex.h> > > +#include <linux/of.h> > > +#include <linux/serdev.h> > > +#include <linux/w1.h> > > + > > +#define W1_UART_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(500) > > + > > +/* > > + * struct w1_uart_config - configuration for 1-Wire operation > > + * > > + * @baudrate: baud-rate returned from serdev > > + * @delay_us: delay to complete a 1-Wire cycle (in us) > > + * @tx_byte: byte to generate 1-Wire timing pattern > > + */ > > +struct w1_uart_config { > > + unsigned int baudrate; > > + unsigned int delay_us; > > + unsigned char tx_byte; > > If it is a "byte", it should be u8. > will change this and all others to u8. ... > > + > > +static inline unsigned int baud_to_bit_ns(unsigned int baud) > > +{ > > + return 1000000000 / baud; > > NSEC_PER_SEC > > > +} > > + > > +static inline unsigned int to_ns(unsigned int us) > > +{ > > + return us * 1000; > > NSEC_PER_USEC > and use the correct constants. ... > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * Set baud-rate, delay and tx-byte to create a 1-Wire pulse and adapt > > + * the tx-byte according to the actual baud-rate. > > + * > > + * Reject when: > > + * - time for a bit outside min/max range > > + * - a 1-Wire response is not detectable for sent byte > > + */ > > +static int w1_uart_set_config(struct serdev_device *serdev, > > + const struct w1_uart_limits *limits, > > + struct w1_uart_config *w1cfg) > > +{ ... > > + /* 1-Wire response detectable for sent byte */ > > + if (limits->sample_us > 0 && > > + bit_ns * 8 < low_ns + to_ns(limits->sample_us)) > > BITS_PER_BYTE > ok, change it (it is the time for the UART data-frame). > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + /* delay to complete 1-Wire cycle, include start and stop-bit */ > > + w1cfg->delay_us = 0; > > + if (bit_ns * 10 < to_ns(limits->cycle_us)) > > What is this 10? Dub it. > > > + w1cfg->delay_us = > > + (to_ns(limits->cycle_us) - bit_ns * 10) / 1000; > > And this 10? > > The end: / NSEC_PER_USEC > will be more explicit (it is the time for the UART packet: BITS_PER_BYTE + 2 (start and stop-bit). ... > > +static int w1_uart_serdev_receive_buf(struct serdev_device *serdev, > > + const unsigned char *buf, size_t count) > > serdev already uses u8 * here. You are basing on the top of some old tree. Yes, this patch is based on the w1-next branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux-w1.git was not sure from where to start. I guess that this change is probably in the w1-tree after the next stable release. > > regards, > -- > js > suse labs > Thanks Jiri for the review! Kind regards, Christoph
On 08/01/2024 19:03, Christoph Winklhofer wrote: > ... >>> +static int w1_uart_serdev_receive_buf(struct serdev_device *serdev, >>> + const unsigned char *buf, size_t count) >> >> serdev already uses u8 * here. You are basing on the top of some old tree. Old? Your change came for v6.8 and this was sent when all trees were based on v6.7-rc1. What newer tree could have this been? > Yes, this patch is based on the w1-next branch of > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux-w1.git > was not sure from where to start. I guess that this change is probably in > the w1-tree after the next stable release. That's a timing issue. For that particular case, where this was targeting next-next cycle, you should have based this on linux-next. In other cases this would require cross-tree merging due to dependencies which none of us were aware, so no harm. Best regards, Krzysztof