Message ID | 20231219171903.3530985-5-hugo@hugovil.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | serial: sc16is7xx: fixes, cleanups and improvements | expand |
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 12:18:48PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com> > > Simplify and improve readability by replacing while(1) loop with > do {} while, and by using the keep_polling variable as the exit > condition, making it more explicit. ... > + bool keep_polling; > + Stray blank line. Otherwise LGTM.
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:42:42 +0200 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 12:18:48PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com> > > > > Simplify and improve readability by replacing while(1) loop with > > do {} while, and by using the keep_polling variable as the exit > > condition, making it more explicit. > > ... > > > + bool keep_polling; > > > + > > Stray blank line. Otherwise LGTM. Yes, and I just realized I should also change: do { keep_polling = false; int i; ... to: do { int i; keep_polling = false; ... Hugo Villeneuve
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c index b2d0f6d307bd..8a038a9be09e 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c @@ -782,17 +782,17 @@ static bool sc16is7xx_port_irq(struct sc16is7xx_port *s, int portno) static irqreturn_t sc16is7xx_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) { + bool keep_polling; + struct sc16is7xx_port *s = (struct sc16is7xx_port *)dev_id; - while (1) { - bool keep_polling = false; + do { + keep_polling = false; int i; for (i = 0; i < s->devtype->nr_uart; ++i) keep_polling |= sc16is7xx_port_irq(s, i); - if (!keep_polling) - break; - } + } while (keep_polling); return IRQ_HANDLED; }