mbox series

[v2,0/5] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce pmu_event_filter_test

Message ID 20231129072712.2667337-1-shahuang@redhat.com
Headers show
Series KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce pmu_event_filter_test | expand

Message

Shaoqin Huang Nov. 29, 2023, 7:27 a.m. UTC
The test is inspired by the pmu_event_filter_test which implemented by x86. On
the arm64 platform, there is the same ability to set the pmu_event_filter
through the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER attribute. So add the test for arm64.

The series first move some pmu common code from vpmu_counter_access to
lib/aarch64/vpmu.c and include/aarch64/vpmu.h, which can be used by
pmu_event_filter_test. Then fix a bug related to the [enable|disable]_counter,
and at last, implement the test itself.

Changelog:
----------
v1->v2:
  - Improve the commit message.                 [Eric]
  - Fix the bug in [enable|disable]_counter.    [Raghavendra & Marc]
  - Add the check if kvm has attr KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER.
  - Add if host pmu support the test event throught pmceid0.
  - Split the test_invalid_filter() to another patch. [Eric]

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231123063750.2176250-1-shahuang@redhat.com/

Shaoqin Huang (5):
  KVM: selftests: aarch64: Make the [create|destroy]_vpmu_vm() public
  KVM: selftests: aarch64: Move pmu helper functions into vpmu.h
  KVM: selftests: aarch64: Fix the buggy [enable|disable]_counter
  KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce pmu_event_filter_test
  KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add invalid filter test in
    pmu_event_filter_test

 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |   2 +
 .../kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c       | 267 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c         | 218 ++------------
 .../selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h      | 135 +++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c  |  74 +++++
 5 files changed, 502 insertions(+), 194 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c

Comments

Eric Auger Dec. 14, 2023, 10:13 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Shaoqin,

On 11/29/23 08:27, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
> In general, the set/clr registers should always be used in their
> write form, never in a RMW form (imagine an interrupt disabling
> a counter between the read and the write...).
> 
> The current implementation of [enable|disable]_counter both use the RMW
> form, fix them by directly write to the set/clr registers.
> 
> At the same time, it also fix the buggy disable_counter() which would
> end up disabling all the counters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>

Eric

> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h | 8 ++------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h
> index e0cc1ca1c4b7..644dae3814b5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h
> @@ -78,17 +78,13 @@ static inline void write_sel_evtyper(int sel, unsigned long val)
>  
>  static inline void enable_counter(int idx)
>  {
> -	uint64_t v = read_sysreg(pmcntenset_el0);
> -
> -	write_sysreg(BIT(idx) | v, pmcntenset_el0);
> +	write_sysreg(BIT(idx), pmcntenset_el0);
>  	isb();
>  }
>  
>  static inline void disable_counter(int idx)
>  {
> -	uint64_t v = read_sysreg(pmcntenset_el0);
> -
> -	write_sysreg(BIT(idx) | v, pmcntenclr_el0);
> +	write_sysreg(BIT(idx), pmcntenclr_el0);
>  	isb();
>  }
>
Eric Auger Dec. 14, 2023, 1:52 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Shaoqin

On 11/29/23 08:27, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
> Add the invalid filter test to double check if the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER
> will return the expected error.
... in which situations? filter beyond the 16b event space or incorrect
action.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  .../kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c       | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> index 0e652fbdb37a..4c375417b194 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>   * This test checks if the guest only see the limited pmu event that userspace
>   * sets, if the guest can use those events which user allow, and if the guest
>   * can't use those events which user deny.
> + * It also checks that setting invalid filter ranges return the expected error.
>   * This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER
>   * is supported on the host.
>   */
> @@ -197,6 +198,39 @@ static void for_each_test(void)
>  		run_test(t);
>  }
>  
> +static void set_invalid_filter(struct vpmu_vm *vm, void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_pmu_event_filter invalid;
> +	struct kvm_device_attr attr = {
> +		.group	= KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
> +		.attr	= KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER,
> +		.addr	= (uint64_t)&invalid,
> +	};
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	/* The max event number is (1 << 16), set a range large than it. */
larger
> +	invalid = __DEFINE_FILTER(BIT(15), BIT(15)+1, 0);
doc says
must fit within the event space defined by the PMU
architecture (10 bits on ARMv8.0, 16 bits from ARMv8.1 onwards).

> +	ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vm->vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &attr);
> +	TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL, "Set Invalid filter range "
> +		    "ret = %d, errno = %d (expected ret = -1, errno = EINVAL)",
> +		    ret, errno);
> +
> +	ret = 0;
> +
> +	/* Set the Invalid action. */
> +	invalid = __DEFINE_FILTER(0, 1, 3);
> +	ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vm->vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &attr);
> +	TEST_ASSERT(ret && errno == EINVAL, "Set Invalid filter action "
> +		    "ret = %d, errno = %d (expected ret = -1, errno = EINVAL)",
> +		    ret, errno);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_invalid_filter(void)
> +{
> +	vpmu_vm = __create_vpmu_vm(guest_code, set_invalid_filter, NULL);
> +	destroy_vpmu_vm(vpmu_vm);
> +}
> +
>  static bool kvm_supports_pmu_event_filter(void)
>  {
>  	int r;
> @@ -228,4 +262,6 @@ int main(void)
>  	TEST_REQUIRE(host_pmu_supports_events());
>  
>  	for_each_test();
> +
> +	test_invalid_filter();
>  }

Eric