Message ID | 20231020024240.7708-1-yangxingui@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | scsi: libsas: fix set zero-address when device-type != NO_DEVICE | expand |
On 2023/10/20 11:24, Jason Yan wrote: > On 2023/10/20 10:42, Xingui Yang wrote: >> phy->attached_sas_addr will be set to a zero-address when >> phy->linkrate < SAS_LINK_RATE_1_5_GBPS but device-type != NO_DEVICE, >> and it may trigger BUG() as follows when do revalidate with zero-address: > > Hi Xingui, > > Why is this zero-addressed PHY added to another port? A zero-addressed > PHY should not belong to any port. Hi Jason, [562240.062536] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy0 new device attached [562240.062616] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy00:U:5 attached: 0000000000000000 (stp) port-7:7:0: trying to add phy phy-7:7:19 fails: it's already part of another port we get phy0's data info: crash> struct ex_phy 0xffff8020cead3000 struct ex_phy { phy_id = 0, phy_state = PHY_EMPTY, attached_dev_type = SAS_END_DEVICE, linkrate = SAS_PHY_RESET_IN_PROGRESS, attached_sata_host = 0 '\000', attached_sata_dev = 1 '\001', attached_sata_ps = 0 '\000', attached_tproto = SAS_PROTOCOL_NONE, attached_iproto = SAS_PROTOCOL_NONE, attached_sas_addr = "\000\000\000\000\000\000\000", attached_phy_id = 0 '\000', phy_change_count = 152, routing_attr = TABLE_ROUTING, virtual = 0 '\000', last_da_index = -1, phy = 0xffff8020ceac5000, port = 0xffffa0300c6f8800 } When a new device is attached, if the address is 0 and the device type is not null, but stp or ssp, the device still creates a port in sas_ex_discover_end_dev() and add all other expander phys with the same sas_address 0 to this port in sas_ex_get_linkrate(). All of the phys is zero-address belongs to port-7:7:0 as follows: crash> list sas_phy.port_siblings -s sas_phy.dev.kobj.name -s sas_phy.identify.sas_address -h ffff8020ceac5000 ffff8020ceac5000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803017878b00 "phy-7:7:0", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceacb000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803017871980 "phy-7:7:1", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceade000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff80301787f580 "phy-7:7:2", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020cead4000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff80301787d980 "phy-7:7:3", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceacc800 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff80301787a480 "phy-7:7:4", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceac6000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803017872500 "phy-7:7:5", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceacd000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803041e62100 "phy-7:7:12", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceadb000 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803041e61980 "phy-7:7:13", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020ceac8800 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803041e61a00 "phy-7:7:14", identify.sas_address = 0, ffff8020cead1800 dev.kobj.name = 0xffff803041e69980 "phy-7:7:15", identify.sas_address = 0, Thanks, Xingui > > Thanks, > Jason > >> >> [562240.062536] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy0 new device attached >> [562240.062616] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy00:U:5 attached: >> 0000000000000000 (stp) >> [562240.062680] port-7:7:0: trying to add phy phy-7:7:19 fails: it's >> already part of another port >> [562240.085064] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [562240.096612] kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c:1083! >> [562240.109611] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP >> [562240.343518] Process kworker/u256:3 (pid: 435909, stack limit = >> 0x0000000003bcbebf) >> [562240.421714] Workqueue: 0000:b4:02.0_disco_q sas_revalidate_domain >> [libsas] >> [562240.437173] pstate: 40c00009 (nZcv daif +PAN +UAO) >> [562240.450478] pc : sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas] >> [562240.465283] lr : sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas] >> [562240.479751] sp : ffff0000300cfa70 >> [562240.674822] Call trace: >> [562240.682709] sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas] >> [562240.694013] sas_ex_get_linkrate.isra.5+0xcc/0x128 [libsas] >> [562240.704957] sas_ex_discover_end_dev+0xfc/0x538 [libsas] >> [562240.715508] sas_ex_discover_dev+0x3cc/0x4b8 [libsas] >> [562240.725634] sas_ex_discover_devices+0x9c/0x1a8 [libsas] >> [562240.735855] sas_ex_revalidate_domain+0x2f0/0x450 [libsas] >> [562240.746123] sas_revalidate_domain+0x158/0x160 [libsas] >> [562240.756014] process_one_work+0x1b4/0x448 >> [562240.764548] worker_thread+0x54/0x468 >> [562240.772562] kthread+0x134/0x138 >> [562240.779989] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 >> >> So set a zero-address for phy->attached_sas_addr only when >> phy->attached_dev_type == NO_DEVICE. >> >> Fixes: 7d1d86518118 ("[SCSI] libsas: fix false positive 'device >> attached' conditions") >> >> Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c >> b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c >> index a2204674b680..5a81754d3768 100644 >> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c >> @@ -239,8 +239,7 @@ static void sas_set_ex_phy(struct domain_device >> *dev, int phy_id, >> /* help some expanders that fail to zero sas_address in the 'no >> * device' case >> */ >> - if (phy->attached_dev_type == SAS_PHY_UNUSED || >> - phy->linkrate < SAS_LINK_RATE_1_5_GBPS) >> + if (phy->attached_dev_type == SAS_PHY_UNUSED) >> memset(phy->attached_sas_addr, 0, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); >> else >> memcpy(phy->attached_sas_addr, dr->attached_sas_addr, >> SAS_ADDR_SIZE); >> > .
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c index a2204674b680..5a81754d3768 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c @@ -239,8 +239,7 @@ static void sas_set_ex_phy(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id, /* help some expanders that fail to zero sas_address in the 'no * device' case */ - if (phy->attached_dev_type == SAS_PHY_UNUSED || - phy->linkrate < SAS_LINK_RATE_1_5_GBPS) + if (phy->attached_dev_type == SAS_PHY_UNUSED) memset(phy->attached_sas_addr, 0, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); else memcpy(phy->attached_sas_addr, dr->attached_sas_addr, SAS_ADDR_SIZE);
phy->attached_sas_addr will be set to a zero-address when phy->linkrate < SAS_LINK_RATE_1_5_GBPS but device-type != NO_DEVICE, and it may trigger BUG() as follows when do revalidate with zero-address: [562240.062536] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy0 new device attached [562240.062616] sas: ex 500e004aaaaaaa1f phy00:U:5 attached: 0000000000000000 (stp) [562240.062680] port-7:7:0: trying to add phy phy-7:7:19 fails: it's already part of another port [562240.085064] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [562240.096612] kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c:1083! [562240.109611] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP [562240.343518] Process kworker/u256:3 (pid: 435909, stack limit = 0x0000000003bcbebf) [562240.421714] Workqueue: 0000:b4:02.0_disco_q sas_revalidate_domain [libsas] [562240.437173] pstate: 40c00009 (nZcv daif +PAN +UAO) [562240.450478] pc : sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas] [562240.465283] lr : sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas] [562240.479751] sp : ffff0000300cfa70 [562240.674822] Call trace: [562240.682709] sas_port_add_phy+0x13c/0x168 [scsi_transport_sas] [562240.694013] sas_ex_get_linkrate.isra.5+0xcc/0x128 [libsas] [562240.704957] sas_ex_discover_end_dev+0xfc/0x538 [libsas] [562240.715508] sas_ex_discover_dev+0x3cc/0x4b8 [libsas] [562240.725634] sas_ex_discover_devices+0x9c/0x1a8 [libsas] [562240.735855] sas_ex_revalidate_domain+0x2f0/0x450 [libsas] [562240.746123] sas_revalidate_domain+0x158/0x160 [libsas] [562240.756014] process_one_work+0x1b4/0x448 [562240.764548] worker_thread+0x54/0x468 [562240.772562] kthread+0x134/0x138 [562240.779989] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 So set a zero-address for phy->attached_sas_addr only when phy->attached_dev_type == NO_DEVICE. Fixes: 7d1d86518118 ("[SCSI] libsas: fix false positive 'device attached' conditions") Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com> --- drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)