Message ID | 20230929131936.29421-1-quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add UFS host controller and Phy nodes for sc7280 | expand |
On 9/29/23 15:19, Nitin Rawat wrote: > Add UFS host controller and PHY nodes for sc7280 IDP board. > > Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com> > Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> > Tested-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> I did not add these tags to this patch, drop them. Konrad
On 9/29/23 15:19, Nitin Rawat wrote: > This patch adds UFS host controller and Phy nodes for Qualcomm sc7280 SOC > and sc7280 Board. > > Changes from v3: > - Addresses Mani comment to include interconnect entry. These are not the only changes you've made. > > Changes from v2: > - Addressed Konrad comment to update binding qcom,ufs.yaml > - Addresses mani/konrad comment to align ufs clock entry in devicetree. > > Changes from v1: > - Addressed mani comment to separate soc and board change. > - Addressed mani comment to sort ufs node in ascending order. > > Nitin Rawat (4): > scsi: ufs: qcom: dt-bindings: Add SC7280 compatible string > arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add UFS nodes for sc7280 soc > arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add UFS nodes for sc7280 IDP board > dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Align clk binding property for Qualcomm UFS > > Nitin Rawat (4): > scsi: ufs: qcom: dt-bindings: Add SC7280 compatible string > arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add UFS nodes for sc7280 soc > arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add UFS nodes for sc7280 IDP board > dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Align clk binding property for Qualcomm UFS And this is bad. Please use the b4 tool [1], half of the issues will be solved.. Konrad [1] https://b4.docs.kernel.org/
On 29/09/2023 15:19, Nitin Rawat wrote: > Document the compatible string for the UFS found on SC7280. > > Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com> > Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they apply. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577 If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. Best regards, Krzysztof