diff mbox series

[V2,1/2] gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Two-dimensional arrays maintain pmic eic

Message ID 20230921122527.15261-2-Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com
State New
Headers show
Series gpio: pmic-eic-sprd: Modification of UNISOC Platform PMIC EIC Driver | expand

Commit Message

Wenhua Lin Sept. 21, 2023, 12:25 p.m. UTC
A bank PMIC EIC contains 16 EICs, and the operating registers
are BIT0-BIT15, such as BIT0 of the register operated by EIC0.
Using the one-dimensional array reg[CACHE_NR_REGS] for maintenance
will cause the configuration of other EICs to be affected when
operating a certain EIC. In order to solve this problem, the register
operation bits of each PMIC EIC are maintained through the two-dimensional
array reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS] to avoid mutual interference.

Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Chunyan Zhang Sept. 28, 2023, 9 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 20:27, Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com> wrote:
>
> A bank PMIC EIC contains 16 EICs, and the operating registers
> are BIT0-BIT15, such as BIT0 of the register operated by EIC0.
> Using the one-dimensional array reg[CACHE_NR_REGS] for maintenance
> will cause the configuration of other EICs to be affected when
> operating a certain EIC. In order to solve this problem, the register
> operation bits of each PMIC EIC are maintained through the two-dimensional
> array reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS] to avoid mutual interference.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> index c3e4d90f6b18..442968bb2490 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct sprd_pmic_eic {
>         struct gpio_chip chip;
>         struct regmap *map;
>         u32 offset;
> -       u8 reg[CACHE_NR_REGS];
> +       u8 reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS];
>         struct mutex buslock;
>         int irq;
>  };
> @@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
>         struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>         u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
>
> -       pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 0;
> -       pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 0;
> +       pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 0;
> +       pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 0;

I would suggest just using this one-dimensional array which is enough
for saving 16-bit values.

To solve the issue mentioned in the commit message, we can set/clear
the bit according to the value of 'offset', for example:

pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] &= ~BIT(offset);

>
>         gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, offset);
>  }
> @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
>
>         gpiochip_enable_irq(chip, offset);
>
> -       pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 1;
> -       pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 1;
> +       pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 1;
> +       pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 1;

For setting operations:

pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] |= BIT(offset);

>  }
>
>  static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> @@ -174,13 +174,14 @@ static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
>  {
>         struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
>         struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +       u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
>
>         switch (flow_type) {
>         case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> -               pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 1;
> +               pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 1;
>                 break;
>         case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> -               pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 0;
> +               pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 0;
>                 break;
>         case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
>         case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> @@ -222,15 +223,15 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
>                         sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV, 1);
>         } else {
>                 sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV,
> -                                    pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV]);
> +                                    pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV]);

When using the array we can deal with it like below since
sprd_pmic_eic_update() would do a shift for the parameter 'val':

(pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] & BIT(offset)) ? 1 : 0;

>         }
>
>         /* Set irq unmask */
>         sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IE,
> -                            pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE]);
> +                            pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE]);
>         /* Generate trigger start pulse for debounce EIC */
>         sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_TRIG,
> -                            pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG]);
> +                            pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG]);

Similar here.

Thanks,
Chunyan
wenhua lin Jan. 2, 2024, 7:29 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 5:01 PM Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Sept 2023 at 20:27, Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com> wrote:
> >
> > A bank PMIC EIC contains 16 EICs, and the operating registers
> > are BIT0-BIT15, such as BIT0 of the register operated by EIC0.
> > Using the one-dimensional array reg[CACHE_NR_REGS] for maintenance
> > will cause the configuration of other EICs to be affected when
> > operating a certain EIC. In order to solve this problem, the register
> > operation bits of each PMIC EIC are maintained through the two-dimensional
> > array reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS] to avoid mutual interference.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wenhua Lin <Wenhua.Lin@unisoc.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> > index c3e4d90f6b18..442968bb2490 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
> > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ struct sprd_pmic_eic {
> >         struct gpio_chip chip;
> >         struct regmap *map;
> >         u32 offset;
> > -       u8 reg[CACHE_NR_REGS];
> > +       u8 reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS];
> >         struct mutex buslock;
> >         int irq;
> >  };
> > @@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> >         struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> >         u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
> >
> > -       pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 0;
> > -       pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 0;
> > +       pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 0;
> > +       pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 0;
>
> I would suggest just using this one-dimensional array which is enough
> for saving 16-bit values.
>
> To solve the issue mentioned in the commit message, we can set/clear
> the bit according to the value of 'offset', for example:
>
> pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] &= ~BIT(offset);
>
> >
> >         gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, offset);
> >  }
> > @@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
> >
> >         gpiochip_enable_irq(chip, offset);
> >
> > -       pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 1;
> > -       pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 1;
> > +       pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 1;
> > +       pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 1;
>
> For setting operations:
>
> pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] |= BIT(offset);
>
> >  }
> >
> >  static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> > @@ -174,13 +174,14 @@ static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
> >  {
> >         struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> >         struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> > +       u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
> >
> >         switch (flow_type) {
> >         case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> > -               pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 1;
> > +               pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 1;
> >                 break;
> >         case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> > -               pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 0;
> > +               pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 0;
> >                 break;
> >         case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> >         case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> > @@ -222,15 +223,15 @@ static void sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
> >                         sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV, 1);
> >         } else {
> >                 sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV,
> > -                                    pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV]);
> > +                                    pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV]);
>
> When using the array we can deal with it like below since
> sprd_pmic_eic_update() would do a shift for the parameter 'val':
>
> (pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] & BIT(offset)) ? 1 : 0;
>

Thank you very much for your review.
I will fix this issue in patch v3.

> >         }
> >
> >         /* Set irq unmask */
> >         sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IE,
> > -                            pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE]);
> > +                            pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE]);
> >         /* Generate trigger start pulse for debounce EIC */
> >         sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_TRIG,
> > -                            pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG]);
> > +                            pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG]);
>
> Similar here.
>
> Thanks,
> Chunyan
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
index c3e4d90f6b18..442968bb2490 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pmic-eic-sprd.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@  struct sprd_pmic_eic {
 	struct gpio_chip chip;
 	struct regmap *map;
 	u32 offset;
-	u8 reg[CACHE_NR_REGS];
+	u8 reg[SPRD_PMIC_EIC_NR][CACHE_NR_REGS];
 	struct mutex buslock;
 	int irq;
 };
@@ -151,8 +151,8 @@  static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
 	struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
 	u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
 
-	pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 0;
-	pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 0;
+	pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 0;
+	pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 0;
 
 	gpiochip_disable_irq(chip, offset);
 }
@@ -165,8 +165,8 @@  static void sprd_pmic_eic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
 
 	gpiochip_enable_irq(chip, offset);
 
-	pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE] = 1;
-	pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG] = 1;
+	pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE] = 1;
+	pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG] = 1;
 }
 
 static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
@@ -174,13 +174,14 @@  static int sprd_pmic_eic_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data,
 {
 	struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
 	struct sprd_pmic_eic *pmic_eic = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+	u32 offset = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
 
 	switch (flow_type) {
 	case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
-		pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 1;
+		pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 1;
 		break;
 	case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
-		pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV] = 0;
+		pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV] = 0;
 		break;
 	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
 	case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
@@ -222,15 +223,15 @@  static void sprd_pmic_eic_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
 			sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV, 1);
 	} else {
 		sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IEV,
-				     pmic_eic->reg[REG_IEV]);
+				     pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IEV]);
 	}
 
 	/* Set irq unmask */
 	sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_IE,
-			     pmic_eic->reg[REG_IE]);
+			     pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_IE]);
 	/* Generate trigger start pulse for debounce EIC */
 	sprd_pmic_eic_update(chip, offset, SPRD_PMIC_EIC_TRIG,
-			     pmic_eic->reg[REG_TRIG]);
+			     pmic_eic->reg[offset][REG_TRIG]);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&pmic_eic->buslock);
 }