| Message ID | 20230925175733.1379-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | kunit: Fix indentation of parameterized tests messages | expand |
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:58 PM Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> wrote: > > When running parametrized test cases, diagnostic messages > are not properly aligned with the test result lines: > > $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output \ > --kunitconfig ./lib/kunit/.kunitconfig *.example_params* > > KTAP version 1 > 1..1 > # example: initializing suite > KTAP version 1 > # Subtest: example > # module: kunit_example_test > 1..1 > KTAP version 1 > # Subtest: example_params_test > # example_params_test: initializing > # example_params_test: cleaning up > ok 1 example value 3 # SKIP unsupported param value 3 > # example_params_test: initializing > # example_params_test: cleaning up > ok 2 example value 2 > # example_params_test: initializing > # example_params_test: cleaning up > ok 3 example value 1 > # example_params_test: initializing > # example_params_test: cleaning up > ok 4 example value 0 # SKIP unsupported param value 0 > # example_params_test: pass:2 fail:0 skip:2 total:4 > ok 1 example_params_test > # example: exiting suite > # Totals: pass:2 fail:0 skip:2 total:4 > ok 1 example > > Add test level attribute and use it to generate proper indent > at the runtime: > > KTAP version 1 > 1..1 > # example: initializing suite > KTAP version 1 > # Subtest: example > # module: kunit_example_test > 1..1 > KTAP version 1 > # Subtest: example_params_test > # example_params_test: initializing > # example_params_test: cleaning up > ok 1 example value 3 # SKIP unsupported param value 3 > # example_params_test: initializing > # example_params_test: cleaning up > ok 2 example value 2 > # example_params_test: initializing > # example_params_test: cleaning up > ok 3 example value 1 > # example_params_test: initializing > # example_params_test: cleaning up > ok 4 example value 0 # SKIP unsupported param value 0 > # example_params_test: pass:2 fail:0 skip:2 total:4 > ok 1 example_params_test > # example: exiting suite > # Totals: pass:2 fail:0 skip:2 total:4 > ok 1 example > > Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> > Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> > Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> Hello! Great to see these changes! Just a few comments below. Thanks! -Rae > --- > include/kunit/test.h | 3 ++- > lib/kunit/test.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h > index 158876c4cb43..4804d539e10f 100644 > --- a/include/kunit/test.h > +++ b/include/kunit/test.h > @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ struct kunit { > void *priv; > > /* private: internal use only. */ > + unsigned int level; /* Helps in proper log indent */ > const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */ > struct string_stream *log; /* Points at case log after initialization */ > struct kunit_try_catch try_catch; > @@ -519,7 +520,7 @@ enum { > #define kunit_level(test_or_suite) \ > _Generic((test_or_suite), \ > struct kunit_suite * : KUNIT_LEVEL_SUITE, \ > - struct kunit * : KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE) > + struct kunit * : ((struct kunit *)(test_or_suite))->level) > > #define kunit_indent_level(test_or_suite) \ > (KUNIT_INDENT_LEN * kunit_level(test_or_suite)) > diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c > index d10e6d610e20..43c3efc286e4 100644 > --- a/lib/kunit/test.c > +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c > @@ -99,14 +99,13 @@ static void kunit_print_test_stats(struct kunit *test, > if (!kunit_should_print_stats(stats)) > return; > > - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, > - KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT > - "# %s: pass:%lu fail:%lu skip:%lu total:%lu", > - test->name, > - stats.passed, > - stats.failed, > - stats.skipped, > - stats.total); > + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, test, > + "# %s: pass:%lu fail:%lu skip:%lu total:%lu", > + test->name, > + stats.passed, > + stats.failed, > + stats.skipped, > + stats.total); I would prefer if we keep the same indentation level as before. Otherwise looks good. > } > > /* Append formatted message to log. */ > @@ -154,7 +153,6 @@ static void kunit_print_suite_start(struct kunit_suite *suite) > } > > static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(struct kunit *test, > - unsigned int test_level, > enum kunit_status status, > size_t test_number, > const char *description, > @@ -163,12 +161,6 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(struct kunit *test, > const char *directive_header = (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? " # SKIP " : ""; > const char *directive_body = (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : ""; > > - /* > - * When test is NULL assume that results are from the suite > - * and today suite results are expected at level 0 only. > - */ > - WARN(!test && test_level, "suite test level can't be %u!\n", test_level); > - > /* > * We do not log the test suite results as doing so would > * mean debugfs display would consist of an incorrect test > @@ -182,12 +174,11 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(struct kunit *test, > test_number, description, directive_header, > directive_body); > else > - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, > - "%*s%s %zd %s%s%s", > - KUNIT_INDENT_LEN * test_level, "", > - kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status), > - test_number, description, directive_header, > - directive_body); > + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, test, > + "%s %zd %s%s%s", > + kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status), > + test_number, description, directive_header, > + directive_body); Again, I would prefer we keep the same indentation as before as it matches the rest of the file. > } > > enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite) > @@ -213,7 +204,7 @@ static size_t kunit_suite_counter = 1; > > static void kunit_print_suite_end(struct kunit_suite *suite) > { > - kunit_print_ok_not_ok(NULL, KUNIT_LEVEL_SUITE, > + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(NULL, > kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite), > kunit_suite_counter++, > suite->name, > @@ -322,6 +313,7 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, struct string_stream > { > spin_lock_init(&test->lock); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&test->resources); > + test->level = KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE; > test->name = name; > test->log = log; > if (test->log) > @@ -584,14 +576,15 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) > kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); > kunit_update_stats(¶m_stats, test.status); > } else { > + /* Parameterized test is one level up from simple test-case. */ > + test.level++; > + > /* Get initial param. */ > param_desc[0] = '\0'; > test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc); > test_case->status = KUNIT_SKIPPED; > - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT > - "KTAP version 1\n"); > - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT > - "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name); > + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, &test, "KTAP version 1\n"); > + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, &test, "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name); > > while (test.param_value) { > kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); > @@ -601,7 +594,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) > "param-%d", test.param_index); > } > > - kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE_PARAM, > + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, > test.status, > test.param_index + 1, > param_desc, > @@ -616,13 +609,16 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) > test.status = KUNIT_SUCCESS; > test.status_comment[0] = '\0'; > } > + > + /* Return to parent (test-case) level. */ > + test.level--; > } > > kunit_print_attr((void *)test_case, true, KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE); > > kunit_print_test_stats(&test, param_stats); > > - kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE, test_case->status, > + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, test_case->status, > kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case), > test_case->name, > test.status_comment); > -- > 2.25.1 >
On 28.09.2023 22:53, Rae Moar wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 1:58 PM Michal Wajdeczko > <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> wrote: >> >> When running parametrized test cases, diagnostic messages >> are not properly aligned with the test result lines: >> >> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output \ >> --kunitconfig ./lib/kunit/.kunitconfig *.example_params* >> >> KTAP version 1 >> 1..1 >> # example: initializing suite >> KTAP version 1 >> # Subtest: example >> # module: kunit_example_test >> 1..1 >> KTAP version 1 >> # Subtest: example_params_test >> # example_params_test: initializing >> # example_params_test: cleaning up >> ok 1 example value 3 # SKIP unsupported param value 3 >> # example_params_test: initializing >> # example_params_test: cleaning up >> ok 2 example value 2 >> # example_params_test: initializing >> # example_params_test: cleaning up >> ok 3 example value 1 >> # example_params_test: initializing >> # example_params_test: cleaning up >> ok 4 example value 0 # SKIP unsupported param value 0 >> # example_params_test: pass:2 fail:0 skip:2 total:4 >> ok 1 example_params_test >> # example: exiting suite >> # Totals: pass:2 fail:0 skip:2 total:4 >> ok 1 example >> >> Add test level attribute and use it to generate proper indent >> at the runtime: >> >> KTAP version 1 >> 1..1 >> # example: initializing suite >> KTAP version 1 >> # Subtest: example >> # module: kunit_example_test >> 1..1 >> KTAP version 1 >> # Subtest: example_params_test >> # example_params_test: initializing >> # example_params_test: cleaning up >> ok 1 example value 3 # SKIP unsupported param value 3 >> # example_params_test: initializing >> # example_params_test: cleaning up >> ok 2 example value 2 >> # example_params_test: initializing >> # example_params_test: cleaning up >> ok 3 example value 1 >> # example_params_test: initializing >> # example_params_test: cleaning up >> ok 4 example value 0 # SKIP unsupported param value 0 >> # example_params_test: pass:2 fail:0 skip:2 total:4 >> ok 1 example_params_test >> # example: exiting suite >> # Totals: pass:2 fail:0 skip:2 total:4 >> ok 1 example >> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> >> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> >> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> > > Hello! > > Great to see these changes! Just a few comments below. > > Thanks! > -Rae > >> --- >> include/kunit/test.h | 3 ++- >> lib/kunit/test.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ >> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h >> index 158876c4cb43..4804d539e10f 100644 >> --- a/include/kunit/test.h >> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h >> @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ struct kunit { >> void *priv; >> >> /* private: internal use only. */ >> + unsigned int level; /* Helps in proper log indent */ >> const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */ >> struct string_stream *log; /* Points at case log after initialization */ >> struct kunit_try_catch try_catch; >> @@ -519,7 +520,7 @@ enum { >> #define kunit_level(test_or_suite) \ >> _Generic((test_or_suite), \ >> struct kunit_suite * : KUNIT_LEVEL_SUITE, \ >> - struct kunit * : KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE) >> + struct kunit * : ((struct kunit *)(test_or_suite))->level) >> >> #define kunit_indent_level(test_or_suite) \ >> (KUNIT_INDENT_LEN * kunit_level(test_or_suite)) >> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c >> index d10e6d610e20..43c3efc286e4 100644 >> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c >> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c >> @@ -99,14 +99,13 @@ static void kunit_print_test_stats(struct kunit *test, >> if (!kunit_should_print_stats(stats)) >> return; >> >> - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, >> - KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT >> - "# %s: pass:%lu fail:%lu skip:%lu total:%lu", >> - test->name, >> - stats.passed, >> - stats.failed, >> - stats.skipped, >> - stats.total); >> + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, test, >> + "# %s: pass:%lu fail:%lu skip:%lu total:%lu", >> + test->name, >> + stats.passed, >> + stats.failed, >> + stats.skipped, >> + stats.total); > > I would prefer if we keep the same indentation level as before. note that then scripts/checkpatch.pl will complain with: CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis #109: FILE: lib/kunit/test.c:103: + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, test, "# %s: pass:%lu fail:%lu skip:%lu total:%lu", CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis #141: FILE: lib/kunit/test.c:178: + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, test, + "%s %zd %s%s%s", are you ok with that? Michal > Otherwise looks good. > >> } >> >> /* Append formatted message to log. */ >> @@ -154,7 +153,6 @@ static void kunit_print_suite_start(struct kunit_suite *suite) >> } >> >> static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(struct kunit *test, >> - unsigned int test_level, >> enum kunit_status status, >> size_t test_number, >> const char *description, >> @@ -163,12 +161,6 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(struct kunit *test, >> const char *directive_header = (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? " # SKIP " : ""; >> const char *directive_body = (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : ""; >> >> - /* >> - * When test is NULL assume that results are from the suite >> - * and today suite results are expected at level 0 only. >> - */ >> - WARN(!test && test_level, "suite test level can't be %u!\n", test_level); >> - >> /* >> * We do not log the test suite results as doing so would >> * mean debugfs display would consist of an incorrect test >> @@ -182,12 +174,11 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(struct kunit *test, >> test_number, description, directive_header, >> directive_body); >> else >> - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, >> - "%*s%s %zd %s%s%s", >> - KUNIT_INDENT_LEN * test_level, "", >> - kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status), >> - test_number, description, directive_header, >> - directive_body); >> + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, test, >> + "%s %zd %s%s%s", >> + kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status), >> + test_number, description, directive_header, >> + directive_body); > > Again, I would prefer we keep the same indentation as before as it > matches the rest of the file. > > >> } >> >> enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite) >> @@ -213,7 +204,7 @@ static size_t kunit_suite_counter = 1; >> >> static void kunit_print_suite_end(struct kunit_suite *suite) >> { >> - kunit_print_ok_not_ok(NULL, KUNIT_LEVEL_SUITE, >> + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(NULL, >> kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite), >> kunit_suite_counter++, >> suite->name, >> @@ -322,6 +313,7 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, struct string_stream >> { >> spin_lock_init(&test->lock); >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&test->resources); >> + test->level = KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE; >> test->name = name; >> test->log = log; >> if (test->log) >> @@ -584,14 +576,15 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) >> kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); >> kunit_update_stats(¶m_stats, test.status); >> } else { >> + /* Parameterized test is one level up from simple test-case. */ >> + test.level++; >> + >> /* Get initial param. */ >> param_desc[0] = '\0'; >> test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc); >> test_case->status = KUNIT_SKIPPED; >> - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT >> - "KTAP version 1\n"); >> - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT >> - "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name); >> + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, &test, "KTAP version 1\n"); >> + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, &test, "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name); >> >> while (test.param_value) { >> kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); >> @@ -601,7 +594,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) >> "param-%d", test.param_index); >> } >> >> - kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE_PARAM, >> + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, >> test.status, >> test.param_index + 1, >> param_desc, >> @@ -616,13 +609,16 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) >> test.status = KUNIT_SUCCESS; >> test.status_comment[0] = '\0'; >> } >> + >> + /* Return to parent (test-case) level. */ >> + test.level--; >> } >> >> kunit_print_attr((void *)test_case, true, KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE); >> >> kunit_print_test_stats(&test, param_stats); >> >> - kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE, test_case->status, >> + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, test_case->status, >> kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case), >> test_case->name, >> test.status_comment); >> -- >> 2.25.1 >>
diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 158876c4cb43..4804d539e10f 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ struct kunit { void *priv; /* private: internal use only. */ + unsigned int level; /* Helps in proper log indent */ const char *name; /* Read only after initialization! */ struct string_stream *log; /* Points at case log after initialization */ struct kunit_try_catch try_catch; @@ -519,7 +520,7 @@ enum { #define kunit_level(test_or_suite) \ _Generic((test_or_suite), \ struct kunit_suite * : KUNIT_LEVEL_SUITE, \ - struct kunit * : KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE) + struct kunit * : ((struct kunit *)(test_or_suite))->level) #define kunit_indent_level(test_or_suite) \ (KUNIT_INDENT_LEN * kunit_level(test_or_suite)) diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index d10e6d610e20..43c3efc286e4 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -99,14 +99,13 @@ static void kunit_print_test_stats(struct kunit *test, if (!kunit_should_print_stats(stats)) return; - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, - KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT - "# %s: pass:%lu fail:%lu skip:%lu total:%lu", - test->name, - stats.passed, - stats.failed, - stats.skipped, - stats.total); + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, test, + "# %s: pass:%lu fail:%lu skip:%lu total:%lu", + test->name, + stats.passed, + stats.failed, + stats.skipped, + stats.total); } /* Append formatted message to log. */ @@ -154,7 +153,6 @@ static void kunit_print_suite_start(struct kunit_suite *suite) } static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(struct kunit *test, - unsigned int test_level, enum kunit_status status, size_t test_number, const char *description, @@ -163,12 +161,6 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(struct kunit *test, const char *directive_header = (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? " # SKIP " : ""; const char *directive_body = (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : ""; - /* - * When test is NULL assume that results are from the suite - * and today suite results are expected at level 0 only. - */ - WARN(!test && test_level, "suite test level can't be %u!\n", test_level); - /* * We do not log the test suite results as doing so would * mean debugfs display would consist of an incorrect test @@ -182,12 +174,11 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(struct kunit *test, test_number, description, directive_header, directive_body); else - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, - "%*s%s %zd %s%s%s", - KUNIT_INDENT_LEN * test_level, "", - kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status), - test_number, description, directive_header, - directive_body); + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, test, + "%s %zd %s%s%s", + kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status), + test_number, description, directive_header, + directive_body); } enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite) @@ -213,7 +204,7 @@ static size_t kunit_suite_counter = 1; static void kunit_print_suite_end(struct kunit_suite *suite) { - kunit_print_ok_not_ok(NULL, KUNIT_LEVEL_SUITE, + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(NULL, kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite), kunit_suite_counter++, suite->name, @@ -322,6 +313,7 @@ void kunit_init_test(struct kunit *test, const char *name, struct string_stream { spin_lock_init(&test->lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&test->resources); + test->level = KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE; test->name = name; test->log = log; if (test->log) @@ -584,14 +576,15 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); kunit_update_stats(¶m_stats, test.status); } else { + /* Parameterized test is one level up from simple test-case. */ + test.level++; + /* Get initial param. */ param_desc[0] = '\0'; test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc); test_case->status = KUNIT_SKIPPED; - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT - "KTAP version 1\n"); - kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT - "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name); + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, &test, "KTAP version 1\n"); + kunit_log_indent(KERN_INFO, &test, "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name); while (test.param_value) { kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test); @@ -601,7 +594,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) "param-%d", test.param_index); } - kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE_PARAM, + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, test.status, test.param_index + 1, param_desc, @@ -616,13 +609,16 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) test.status = KUNIT_SUCCESS; test.status_comment[0] = '\0'; } + + /* Return to parent (test-case) level. */ + test.level--; } kunit_print_attr((void *)test_case, true, KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE); kunit_print_test_stats(&test, param_stats); - kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, KUNIT_LEVEL_CASE, test_case->status, + kunit_print_ok_not_ok(&test, test_case->status, kunit_test_case_num(suite, test_case), test_case->name, test.status_comment);
When running parametrized test cases, diagnostic messages are not properly aligned with the test result lines: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output \ --kunitconfig ./lib/kunit/.kunitconfig *.example_params* KTAP version 1 1..1 # example: initializing suite KTAP version 1 # Subtest: example # module: kunit_example_test 1..1 KTAP version 1 # Subtest: example_params_test # example_params_test: initializing # example_params_test: cleaning up ok 1 example value 3 # SKIP unsupported param value 3 # example_params_test: initializing # example_params_test: cleaning up ok 2 example value 2 # example_params_test: initializing # example_params_test: cleaning up ok 3 example value 1 # example_params_test: initializing # example_params_test: cleaning up ok 4 example value 0 # SKIP unsupported param value 0 # example_params_test: pass:2 fail:0 skip:2 total:4 ok 1 example_params_test # example: exiting suite # Totals: pass:2 fail:0 skip:2 total:4 ok 1 example Add test level attribute and use it to generate proper indent at the runtime: KTAP version 1 1..1 # example: initializing suite KTAP version 1 # Subtest: example # module: kunit_example_test 1..1 KTAP version 1 # Subtest: example_params_test # example_params_test: initializing # example_params_test: cleaning up ok 1 example value 3 # SKIP unsupported param value 3 # example_params_test: initializing # example_params_test: cleaning up ok 2 example value 2 # example_params_test: initializing # example_params_test: cleaning up ok 3 example value 1 # example_params_test: initializing # example_params_test: cleaning up ok 4 example value 0 # SKIP unsupported param value 0 # example_params_test: pass:2 fail:0 skip:2 total:4 ok 1 example_params_test # example: exiting suite # Totals: pass:2 fail:0 skip:2 total:4 ok 1 example Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> --- include/kunit/test.h | 3 ++- lib/kunit/test.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)