Message ID | 20230908-kselftest-09-08-v2-0-0def978a4c1b@google.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | selftests/hid: fix building for older kernels | expand |
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 10:22:37PM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote: > Hi, I am sending this series on behalf of myself and Benjamin Tissoires. There > existed an initial n=3 patch series which was later expanded to n=4 and > is now back to n=3 with some fixes added in and rebased against > mainline. > > This patch series aims to ensure that the hid/bpf selftests can be built > without errors. > > Here's Benjamin's initial cover letter for context: > | These fixes have been triggered by [0]: > | basically, if you do not recompile the kernel first, and are > | running on an old kernel, vmlinux.h doesn't have the required > | symbols and the compilation fails. > | > | The tests will fail if you run them on that very same machine, > | of course, but the binary should compile. > | > | And while I was sorting out why it was failing, I realized I > | could do a couple of improvements on the Makefile. > | > | [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/56ba8125-2c6f-a9c9-d498-0ca1c153dcb2@redhat.com/T/#t > > Changes from v1 -> v2: > - roll Justin's fix into patch 1/3 > - add __attribute__((preserve_access_index)) (thanks Eduard) > - rebased onto mainline (2dde18cd1d8fac735875f2e4987f11817cc0bc2c) > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230825-wip-selftests-v1-0-c862769020a8@kernel.org/ > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1698 > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration2/issues/61 Thanks to you and Benjamin for sorting all of this out! With this series applied, I was able to build the hid selftests now without the previous -Wvisibility diagnostics failing the build. Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> # Build > --- > Benjamin Tissoires (3): > selftests/hid: ensure we can compile the tests on kernels pre-6.3 > selftests/hid: do not manually call headers_install > selftests/hid: force using our compiled libbpf headers > > tools/testing/selftests/hid/Makefile | 10 ++--- > tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c | 3 -- > .../testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid_bpf_helpers.h | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > --- > base-commit: 2dde18cd1d8fac735875f2e4987f11817cc0bc2c > change-id: 20230908-kselftest-09-08-56d7f4a8d5c4 > > Best regards, > -- > Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> >
Hey all, Gentle ping on this patch. Looking to get this patch and [1] slated for 6.7 wherein we can start getting cleaner kselftests builds. I do not think I am able to successfully run the hid/bpf selftests due to my kernel version being too low (and an inability to upgrade it as I'm on a corp rolling release). I'd appreciate some insight on how to get the tests running or if someone could actually build+run the tests with this patch applied. On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 7:22 AM Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> wrote: > > Hi, I am sending this series on behalf of myself and Benjamin Tissoires. There > existed an initial n=3 patch series which was later expanded to n=4 and > is now back to n=3 with some fixes added in and rebased against > mainline. > > This patch series aims to ensure that the hid/bpf selftests can be built > without errors. > > Here's Benjamin's initial cover letter for context: > | These fixes have been triggered by [0]: > | basically, if you do not recompile the kernel first, and are > | running on an old kernel, vmlinux.h doesn't have the required > | symbols and the compilation fails. > | > | The tests will fail if you run them on that very same machine, > | of course, but the binary should compile. > | > | And while I was sorting out why it was failing, I realized I > | could do a couple of improvements on the Makefile. > | > | [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/56ba8125-2c6f-a9c9-d498-0ca1c153dcb2@redhat.com/T/#t > > Changes from v1 -> v2: > - roll Justin's fix into patch 1/3 > - add __attribute__((preserve_access_index)) (thanks Eduard) > - rebased onto mainline (2dde18cd1d8fac735875f2e4987f11817cc0bc2c) > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230825-wip-selftests-v1-0-c862769020a8@kernel.org/ > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1698 > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration2/issues/61 > --- > Benjamin Tissoires (3): > selftests/hid: ensure we can compile the tests on kernels pre-6.3 > selftests/hid: do not manually call headers_install > selftests/hid: force using our compiled libbpf headers > > tools/testing/selftests/hid/Makefile | 10 ++--- > tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c | 3 -- > .../testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid_bpf_helpers.h | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > --- > base-commit: 2dde18cd1d8fac735875f2e4987f11817cc0bc2c > change-id: 20230908-kselftest-09-08-56d7f4a8d5c4 > > Best regards, > -- > Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230912-kselftest-param_test-c-v1-1-80a6cffc7374@google.com/ Thanks Justin
On Sep 26 2023, Justin Stitt wrote: > Hey all, > > Gentle ping on this patch. Looking to get this patch and [1] slated > for 6.7 wherein we can start getting cleaner kselftests builds. > > I do not think I am able to successfully run the hid/bpf selftests due > to my kernel version being too low (and an inability to upgrade it as > I'm on a corp rolling release). I'd appreciate some insight on how to > get the tests running or if someone could actually build+run the tests > with this patch applied. I wanted to apply this series today, but it failed my own CI now with the enums being already defined: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/bentiss/hid/-/jobs/49754306 I'll probably squash the following patch in 1/3, would you mind giving it a test? ---