Message ID | 1323168355-2764-2-git-send-email-tushar.behera@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 16:15 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > amba_probe() now calls pm_runtime_get_noresume() and pm_runtime_enable() > for the devices before the device probe is called. Hence we don't need > to call pm_runtime_get_xxx and pm_runtime_enable() in device probe again. > In the same way, since amba_remove() calls the respective pm_runtime > functions, those functions need not be called from device remove. > > This patch fixes following run time error with pl330 driver. > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable! > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: failed to get runtime pm > > Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy <giridhar.maruthy@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> Looks fine to me. Do you want these to go thru slave-dma or samsung tree. For latter: Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 17 ++--------------- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/pl330.c b/drivers/dma/pl330.c > index a626e15..cd07121 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/pl330.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/pl330.c > @@ -834,17 +834,7 @@ pl330_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id) > > amba_set_drvdata(adev, pdmac); > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME > - /* to use the runtime PM helper functions */ > - pm_runtime_enable(&adev->dev); > - > - /* enable the power domain */ > - if (pm_runtime_get_sync(&adev->dev)) { > - dev_err(&adev->dev, "failed to get runtime pm\n"); > - ret = -ENODEV; > - goto probe_err1; > - } > -#else > +#ifndef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME > /* enable dma clk */ > clk_enable(pdmac->clk); > #endif > @@ -977,10 +967,7 @@ static int __devexit pl330_remove(struct amba_device *adev) > res = &adev->res; > release_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res)); > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME > - pm_runtime_put(&adev->dev); > - pm_runtime_disable(&adev->dev); > -#else > +#ifndef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME > clk_disable(pdmac->clk); > #endif >
Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 16:15 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > > amba_probe() now calls pm_runtime_get_noresume() and pm_runtime_enable() > > for the devices before the device probe is called. Hence we don't need > > to call pm_runtime_get_xxx and pm_runtime_enable() in device probe again. > > In the same way, since amba_remove() calls the respective pm_runtime > > functions, those functions need not be called from device remove. > > > > This patch fixes following run time error with pl330 driver. > > > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable! > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: failed to get runtime pm > > > > Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy <giridhar.maruthy@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> > Looks fine to me. Do you want these to go thru slave-dma or samsung > tree. Hi Vinod, I think, this patch can be sent to upstream via slave-dma tree and second one via Samsung tree separately and you can add my and Boojin Kim's ack(actually, she replied) on this when you apply. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > For latter: > Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@linux.intel.com> > > > --- > > drivers/dma/pl330.c | 17 ++--------------- > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/pl330.c b/drivers/dma/pl330.c > > index a626e15..cd07121 100644 > > --- a/drivers/dma/pl330.c > > +++ b/drivers/dma/pl330.c > > @@ -834,17 +834,7 @@ pl330_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id) > > > > amba_set_drvdata(adev, pdmac); > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME > > - /* to use the runtime PM helper functions */ > > - pm_runtime_enable(&adev->dev); > > - > > - /* enable the power domain */ > > - if (pm_runtime_get_sync(&adev->dev)) { > > - dev_err(&adev->dev, "failed to get runtime pm\n"); > > - ret = -ENODEV; > > - goto probe_err1; > > - } > > -#else > > +#ifndef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME > > /* enable dma clk */ > > clk_enable(pdmac->clk); > > #endif > > @@ -977,10 +967,7 @@ static int __devexit pl330_remove(struct amba_device *adev) > > res = &adev->res; > > release_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res)); > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME > > - pm_runtime_put(&adev->dev); > > - pm_runtime_disable(&adev->dev); > > -#else > > +#ifndef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME > > clk_disable(pdmac->clk); > > #endif > > > > > -- > ~Vinod
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 16:43 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Vinod Koul wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 16:15 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > > > amba_probe() now calls pm_runtime_get_noresume() and pm_runtime_enable() > > > for the devices before the device probe is called. Hence we don't need > > > to call pm_runtime_get_xxx and pm_runtime_enable() in device probe again. > > > In the same way, since amba_remove() calls the respective pm_runtime > > > functions, those functions need not be called from device remove. > > > > > > This patch fixes following run time error with pl330 driver. > > > > > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable! > > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: failed to get runtime pm > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy <giridhar.maruthy@linaro.org> > > > Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> > > Looks fine to me. Do you want these to go thru slave-dma or samsung > > tree. > > Hi Vinod, > > I think, this patch can be sent to upstream via slave-dma tree and > second one via Samsung tree separately and you can add my and Boojin > Kim's ack(actually, she replied) on this when you apply. Okay, I have applied this one only
On 8 December 2011 13:46, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 16:43 +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> Vinod Koul wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 16:15 +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: >> > > amba_probe() now calls pm_runtime_get_noresume() and pm_runtime_enable() >> > > for the devices before the device probe is called. Hence we don't need >> > > to call pm_runtime_get_xxx and pm_runtime_enable() in device probe again. >> > > In the same way, since amba_remove() calls the respective pm_runtime >> > > functions, those functions need not be called from device remove. >> > > >> > > This patch fixes following run time error with pl330 driver. >> > > >> > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable! >> > > dma-pl330 dma-pl330.0: failed to get runtime pm >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Giridhar Maruthy <giridhar.maruthy@linaro.org> >> > > Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> >> > Looks fine to me. Do you want these to go thru slave-dma or samsung >> > tree. >> >> Hi Vinod, >> >> I think, this patch can be sent to upstream via slave-dma tree and >> second one via Samsung tree separately and you can add my and Boojin >> Kim's ack(actually, she replied) on this when you apply. > > Okay, I have applied this one only > Guys, any reason to keep me, the author of the driver, out of loop ? I almost lost this patch, had it not for chance. Also, I noticed 42bc9cf45939c2 'DMA: PL330: Add DMA_CYCLIC capability' while implements my correction, doesn't carry the ack http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg06386.html While, unlike some, I am not interested in claiming territory by pissing around acks, I would sure like to log my acks if I spent personal time maintaining the code I am supposed to be responsible for.
On 12/08/2011 07:02 PM, Jassi Brar wrote: > Guys, any reason to keep me, the author of the driver, out of loop ? > I almost lost this patch, had it not for chance. Apologies. I didn't realize that I should be adding a cc to you. Would you please add a valid module author e-mail ID?
On 9 December 2011 08:49, Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org> wrote: > On 12/08/2011 07:02 PM, Jassi Brar wrote: >> >> Guys, any reason to keep me, the author of the driver, out of loop ? >> I almost lost this patch, had it not for chance. > > > Apologies. I didn't realize that I should be adding a cc to you. > > Would you please add a valid module author e-mail ID? > I doubt if someone knows that my samsung id is invalid but doesn't know which is the valid one ;) Anyways, I shall update to my private email id.
diff --git a/drivers/dma/pl330.c b/drivers/dma/pl330.c index a626e15..cd07121 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/pl330.c +++ b/drivers/dma/pl330.c @@ -834,17 +834,7 @@ pl330_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id) amba_set_drvdata(adev, pdmac); -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME - /* to use the runtime PM helper functions */ - pm_runtime_enable(&adev->dev); - - /* enable the power domain */ - if (pm_runtime_get_sync(&adev->dev)) { - dev_err(&adev->dev, "failed to get runtime pm\n"); - ret = -ENODEV; - goto probe_err1; - } -#else +#ifndef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME /* enable dma clk */ clk_enable(pdmac->clk); #endif @@ -977,10 +967,7 @@ static int __devexit pl330_remove(struct amba_device *adev) res = &adev->res; release_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res)); -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME - pm_runtime_put(&adev->dev); - pm_runtime_disable(&adev->dev); -#else +#ifndef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME clk_disable(pdmac->clk); #endif