| Message ID | 1688395346-3126-3-git-send-email-quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add Power Domains and Regulators in SDX75 | expand |
On 3.07.2023 16:42, Rohit Agarwal wrote: > Add RPM power domain bindings for the SDX75 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 + > include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml > index afad313..58e1be8 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml > @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ properties: > - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd > - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd > - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd > + - qcom,sdx75-rpmhpd > - qcom,sm6115-rpmpd > - qcom,sm6125-rpmpd > - qcom,sm6350-rpmhpd > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h > index 1bf8e87..8092d0d 100644 > --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h > @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@ > #define SDX65_CX_AO 4 > #define SDX65_MXC 5 > > +/* SDX75 Power Domain Indexes */ > +#define SDX75_CX 0 > +#define SDX75_CX_AO 1 > +#define SDX75_MSS 2 > +#define SDX75_MX 3 > +#define SDX75_MX_AO 4 > +#define SDX75_MXC 5 Please instead introduce a set of defines without the SoC prefix (i.e. CX, CX_AO, MX etc.). We've been putting this off for too long and you're the first unlucky guy that submitted new RPMhPD support after we've concluded it'd be the way to go! :D Sadly, we can't replace the existing ones retroactively.. Konrad > + > /* SM6350 Power Domain Indexes */ > #define SM6350_CX 0 > #define SM6350_GFX 1
On 7/3/2023 8:29 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 3.07.2023 16:42, Rohit Agarwal wrote: >> Add RPM power domain bindings for the SDX75 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 + >> include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 8 ++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml >> index afad313..58e1be8 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml >> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ properties: >> - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd >> - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd >> - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd >> + - qcom,sdx75-rpmhpd >> - qcom,sm6115-rpmpd >> - qcom,sm6125-rpmpd >> - qcom,sm6350-rpmhpd >> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h >> index 1bf8e87..8092d0d 100644 >> --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h >> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h >> @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@ >> #define SDX65_CX_AO 4 >> #define SDX65_MXC 5 >> >> +/* SDX75 Power Domain Indexes */ >> +#define SDX75_CX 0 >> +#define SDX75_CX_AO 1 >> +#define SDX75_MSS 2 >> +#define SDX75_MX 3 >> +#define SDX75_MX_AO 4 >> +#define SDX75_MXC 5 > Please instead introduce a set of defines without the SoC prefix > (i.e. CX, CX_AO, MX etc.). We've been putting this off for too long > and you're the first unlucky guy that submitted new RPMhPD support after > we've concluded it'd be the way to go! :D Sadly, we can't replace the > existing ones retroactively.. Surely No issues. Will update it. Thanks, Rohit. > Konrad >> + >> /* SM6350 Power Domain Indexes */ >> #define SM6350_CX 0 >> #define SM6350_GFX 1
On 7/4/2023 11:47 AM, Rohit Agarwal wrote: > > On 7/3/2023 8:29 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 3.07.2023 16:42, Rohit Agarwal wrote: >>> Add RPM power domain bindings for the SDX75 SoC. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 + >>> include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 8 ++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml >>> index afad313..58e1be8 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml >>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ properties: >>> - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd >>> - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd >>> - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd >>> + - qcom,sdx75-rpmhpd >>> - qcom,sm6115-rpmpd >>> - qcom,sm6125-rpmpd >>> - qcom,sm6350-rpmhpd >>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h >>> b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h >>> index 1bf8e87..8092d0d 100644 >>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h >>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h >>> @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@ >>> #define SDX65_CX_AO 4 >>> #define SDX65_MXC 5 >>> +/* SDX75 Power Domain Indexes */ >>> +#define SDX75_CX 0 >>> +#define SDX75_CX_AO 1 >>> +#define SDX75_MSS 2 >>> +#define SDX75_MX 3 >>> +#define SDX75_MX_AO 4 >>> +#define SDX75_MXC 5 >> Please instead introduce a set of defines without the SoC prefix >> (i.e. CX, CX_AO, MX etc.). We've been putting this off for too long >> and you're the first unlucky guy that submitted new RPMhPD support after >> we've concluded it'd be the way to go! :D Sadly, we can't replace the >> existing ones retroactively.. > Surely No issues. Will update it. I have a doubt here. Cant we completely omit the #defines here and directly index this as 0,1,... because if the intention of this #defines is to understand the name of the pd then we can get it from the .name attribute in rpmhpd as well, right? The problems with a common set of #define would be, lets say if we define CX_AO as 1 and some platform doesn't have CX_AO then wouldnt it leave a null entry in the driver entry of that platform? Thanks, Rohit. > > Thanks, > Rohit. >> Konrad >>> + >>> /* SM6350 Power Domain Indexes */ >>> #define SM6350_CX 0 >>> #define SM6350_GFX 1
On 5.07.2023 10:54, Rohit Agarwal wrote: > > On 7/4/2023 11:47 AM, Rohit Agarwal wrote: >> >> On 7/3/2023 8:29 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>> On 3.07.2023 16:42, Rohit Agarwal wrote: >>>> Add RPM power domain bindings for the SDX75 SoC. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com> >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 + >>>> include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 8 ++++++++ >>>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml >>>> index afad313..58e1be8 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml >>>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ properties: >>>> - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd >>>> - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd >>>> - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd >>>> + - qcom,sdx75-rpmhpd >>>> - qcom,sm6115-rpmpd >>>> - qcom,sm6125-rpmpd >>>> - qcom,sm6350-rpmhpd >>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h >>>> index 1bf8e87..8092d0d 100644 >>>> --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h >>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h >>>> @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@ >>>> #define SDX65_CX_AO 4 >>>> #define SDX65_MXC 5 >>>> +/* SDX75 Power Domain Indexes */ >>>> +#define SDX75_CX 0 >>>> +#define SDX75_CX_AO 1 >>>> +#define SDX75_MSS 2 >>>> +#define SDX75_MX 3 >>>> +#define SDX75_MX_AO 4 >>>> +#define SDX75_MXC 5 >>> Please instead introduce a set of defines without the SoC prefix >>> (i.e. CX, CX_AO, MX etc.). We've been putting this off for too long >>> and you're the first unlucky guy that submitted new RPMhPD support after >>> we've concluded it'd be the way to go! :D Sadly, we can't replace the >>> existing ones retroactively.. >> Surely No issues. Will update it. > > I have a doubt here. Cant we completely omit the #defines here and directly index this as 0,1,... > because if the intention of this #defines is to understand the name of the pd then we can get > it from the .name attribute in rpmhpd as well, right? > > The problems with a common set of #define would be, lets say if we define CX_AO as 1 and some platform > doesn't have CX_AO then wouldnt it leave a null entry in the driver entry of that platform? Yes. We already do this in the rpmh clock driver, as: 1. there are domains that all chips share (like CX etc.) 2. wasting a couple of bytes lets us massively save on convolution Konrad > > Thanks, > Rohit. > >> >> Thanks, >> Rohit. >>> Konrad >>>> + >>>> /* SM6350 Power Domain Indexes */ >>>> #define SM6350_CX 0 >>>> #define SM6350_GFX 1
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml index afad313..58e1be8 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ properties: - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd + - qcom,sdx75-rpmhpd - qcom,sm6115-rpmpd - qcom,sm6125-rpmpd - qcom,sm6350-rpmhpd diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h index 1bf8e87..8092d0d 100644 --- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@ #define SDX65_CX_AO 4 #define SDX65_MXC 5 +/* SDX75 Power Domain Indexes */ +#define SDX75_CX 0 +#define SDX75_CX_AO 1 +#define SDX75_MSS 2 +#define SDX75_MX 3 +#define SDX75_MX_AO 4 +#define SDX75_MXC 5 + /* SM6350 Power Domain Indexes */ #define SM6350_CX 0 #define SM6350_GFX 1
Add RPM power domain bindings for the SDX75 SoC. Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 + include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)