Message ID | 20230421-fp4-bluetooth-v1-0-0430e3a7e0a2@fairphone.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add WCN3988 Bluetooth support for Fairphone 4 | expand |
On 21.04.2023 16:11, Luca Weiss wrote: > Just to start with the important part why this is an RFC: > > While Bluetooth chip init works totally fine and bluez seems to be > fairly happy with it, there's a (major) problem with scanning, as shown > with this bluetoothctl snippet and dmesg snippet: > > [bluetooth]# scan on > Failed to start discovery: org.bluez.Error.InProgress > > [ 202.371374] Bluetooth: hci0: Opcode 0x200b failed: -16 > > This opcode should be the following: > > include/net/bluetooth/hci.h:#define HCI_OP_LE_SET_SCAN_PARAM 0x200b Not a bluetooth expert or anything, but does that thing support bluetooth LE? Konrad > > Unfortunately trying various existing code branches in the Bluetooth > driver doesn't show any sign of making this work and I don't really know > where to look to debug this further. > > On the other hand "discoverable on" makes the device show up on other > devices during scanning , so the RF parts of the Bluetooth chip are > generally functional for sure. > > Any ideas are welcome. > > @Bjorn: Patch "arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: add uart1 node" should be fine > to take regardless the RFC status, I don't think the problem is caused > there. > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> > --- > Luca Weiss (4): > dt-bindings: net: qualcomm: Add WCN3988 > Bluetooth: btqca: Add WCN3988 support > arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: add uart1 node > arm64: dts: qcom: sm7225-fairphone-fp4: Add Bluetooth > > .../bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml | 2 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm7225-fairphone-fp4.dts | 17 ++++++ > drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c | 13 ++++- > drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h | 12 ++++- > drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 12 +++++ > 6 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > --- > base-commit: cf4c0112a0350cfe8a63b5eb3377e2366f57545b > change-id: 20230421-fp4-bluetooth-b36a0e87b9c8 > > Best regards,
On Sat Apr 22, 2023 at 2:03 PM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > > On 21.04.2023 16:11, Luca Weiss wrote: > > Just to start with the important part why this is an RFC: > > > > While Bluetooth chip init works totally fine and bluez seems to be > > fairly happy with it, there's a (major) problem with scanning, as shown > > with this bluetoothctl snippet and dmesg snippet: > > > > [bluetooth]# scan on > > Failed to start discovery: org.bluez.Error.InProgress > > > > [ 202.371374] Bluetooth: hci0: Opcode 0x200b failed: -16 > > > > This opcode should be the following: > > > > include/net/bluetooth/hci.h:#define HCI_OP_LE_SET_SCAN_PARAM 0x200b > Not a bluetooth expert or anything, but does that thing support > bluetooth LE? I don't know too much about Bluetooth details either, but hasn't Bluetooth LE been a consistently supported thing since like 10 years? All the info I can easily find just states SM7225 SoC supports "Bluetooth 5.1". Regards Luca > > Konrad > > > > Unfortunately trying various existing code branches in the Bluetooth > > driver doesn't show any sign of making this work and I don't really know > > where to look to debug this further. > > > > On the other hand "discoverable on" makes the device show up on other > > devices during scanning , so the RF parts of the Bluetooth chip are > > generally functional for sure. > > > > Any ideas are welcome. > > > > @Bjorn: Patch "arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: add uart1 node" should be fine > > to take regardless the RFC status, I don't think the problem is caused > > there. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> > > --- > > Luca Weiss (4): > > dt-bindings: net: qualcomm: Add WCN3988 > > Bluetooth: btqca: Add WCN3988 support > > arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: add uart1 node > > arm64: dts: qcom: sm7225-fairphone-fp4: Add Bluetooth > > > > .../bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml | 2 + > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm7225-fairphone-fp4.dts | 17 ++++++ > > drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c | 13 ++++- > > drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h | 12 ++++- > > drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 12 +++++ > > 6 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > --- > > base-commit: cf4c0112a0350cfe8a63b5eb3377e2366f57545b > > change-id: 20230421-fp4-bluetooth-b36a0e87b9c8 > > > > Best regards,
Just to start with the important part why this is an RFC: While Bluetooth chip init works totally fine and bluez seems to be fairly happy with it, there's a (major) problem with scanning, as shown with this bluetoothctl snippet and dmesg snippet: [bluetooth]# scan on Failed to start discovery: org.bluez.Error.InProgress [ 202.371374] Bluetooth: hci0: Opcode 0x200b failed: -16 This opcode should be the following: include/net/bluetooth/hci.h:#define HCI_OP_LE_SET_SCAN_PARAM 0x200b Unfortunately trying various existing code branches in the Bluetooth driver doesn't show any sign of making this work and I don't really know where to look to debug this further. On the other hand "discoverable on" makes the device show up on other devices during scanning , so the RF parts of the Bluetooth chip are generally functional for sure. Any ideas are welcome. @Bjorn: Patch "arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: add uart1 node" should be fine to take regardless the RFC status, I don't think the problem is caused there. Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> --- Luca Weiss (4): dt-bindings: net: qualcomm: Add WCN3988 Bluetooth: btqca: Add WCN3988 support arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: add uart1 node arm64: dts: qcom: sm7225-fairphone-fp4: Add Bluetooth .../bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml | 2 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm7225-fairphone-fp4.dts | 17 ++++++ drivers/bluetooth/btqca.c | 13 ++++- drivers/bluetooth/btqca.h | 12 ++++- drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 12 +++++ 6 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- base-commit: cf4c0112a0350cfe8a63b5eb3377e2366f57545b change-id: 20230421-fp4-bluetooth-b36a0e87b9c8 Best regards,