Message ID | 20230414152423.19842-1-ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: meson: support Amlogic A1 USB OTG controller | expand |
On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 5:24 PM Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru> wrote: [...] > static const struct dwc3_meson_g12a_drvdata a1_drvdata = { > - .otg_switch_supported = false, > + .otg_switch_supported = true, it would be great if you could also follow up with a patch that removes otg_switch_supported. A1 was the only variant that needed it and after this patch it's just dead code. Best regards, Martin
Hello Martin, Thank you for quick review, appreciate it! Please find my comments below and in the other replies. On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 10:56:36PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 5:24 PM Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru> wrote: > [...] > > static const struct dwc3_meson_g12a_drvdata a1_drvdata = { > > - .otg_switch_supported = false, > > + .otg_switch_supported = true, > it would be great if you could also follow up with a patch that > removes otg_switch_supported. > A1 was the only variant that needed it and after this patch it's just dead code. It makes sense. I thought about it before sending the first version, but I found a counter-argument: future SoCs may use this parameter. But if you ask, I will remove 'otg_switch_supported' in the next version
On 17/04/2023 13:47, Dmitry Rokosov wrote: > Hello Martin, > > Thank you for quick review, appreciate it! > Please find my comments below and in the other replies. > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 10:56:36PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 5:24 PM Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru> wrote: >> [...] >>> static const struct dwc3_meson_g12a_drvdata a1_drvdata = { >>> - .otg_switch_supported = false, >>> + .otg_switch_supported = true, >> it would be great if you could also follow up with a patch that >> removes otg_switch_supported. >> A1 was the only variant that needed it and after this patch it's just dead code. > > It makes sense. I thought about it before sending the first version, but > I found a counter-argument: future SoCs may use this parameter. > But if you ask, I will remove 'otg_switch_supported' in the next version > Please remove it, it's easy to add it again if needed. Neil
Hello Neil, Thank you for review, appreciate it! On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 02:22:26PM +0200, neil.armstrong@linaro.org wrote: > On 17/04/2023 13:47, Dmitry Rokosov wrote: > > Hello Martin, > > > > Thank you for quick review, appreciate it! > > Please find my comments below and in the other replies. > > > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 10:56:36PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 5:24 PM Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru> wrote: > > > [...] > > > > static const struct dwc3_meson_g12a_drvdata a1_drvdata = { > > > > - .otg_switch_supported = false, > > > > + .otg_switch_supported = true, > > > it would be great if you could also follow up with a patch that > > > removes otg_switch_supported. > > > A1 was the only variant that needed it and after this patch it's just dead code. > > > > It makes sense. I thought about it before sending the first version, but > > I found a counter-argument: future SoCs may use this parameter. > > But if you ask, I will remove 'otg_switch_supported' in the next version > > > > Please remove it, it's easy to add it again if needed. Sure, no problem. It will be removed in the next version.