Message ID | 878rfyjz4p.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ASoC: remove unnecessary dai_link->platform | expand |
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 06:42:10AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > dai_link->platform is no longer needed if CPU and Platform are > same Component. This patch removes unnecessary dai_link->platform. I've not poked at things to try to figure out if it's this specific patch yet but this series is breaking BeagleBone Black in my CI, none of the sample rates covered by pcm-test are supported: https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/195516#L1430 some should be skipped due to being unsupported but we should see 48kHz playback covered: https://lava.sirena.org.uk/scheduler/job/195338#L1433
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 06:42:44AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > dai_link->platform is no longer needed if CPU and Platform are > same Component. This patch removes unnecessary dai_link->platform. > > Simple-Card (Normal) is supporting platform, but > Simple-Cadd (DPCM), Audio-Graph-Card/Card2 (Normal/DPCM) are not > for now. A bisect tells me that this patch rather than the TI one is responsible for the issues I'm seeing on BeagleBone Black.
Hi Mark Thank you for your test > > dai_link->platform is no longer needed if CPU and Platform are > > same Component. This patch removes unnecessary dai_link->platform. > > > > Simple-Card (Normal) is supporting platform, but > > Simple-Cadd (DPCM), Audio-Graph-Card/Card2 (Normal/DPCM) are not > > for now. > > A bisect tells me that this patch rather than the TI one is responsible > for the issues I'm seeing on BeagleBone Black. I see. I don't have BeagleBone thus this is my guess. I think BeagleBone is using soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm.c. This means, CPU and Platform are different Component, but are using same dev (= component->dev). In this case, this patch assumes BeagleBone need to have "plat = <&xxx>" on DT (but it doesn't). And Simple Card have been covered it automatically (It assumes Platform == CPU if no Platform was selected). Hmm... I recalled similar things happen before. OK, please drop this patch. We want to keep existing DT as-is. But instead, I want to post other patch which add comment to Simple-Card that indicates Simple-Card is caring soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm automatically. Otherwise I will forget it again, and will repost same/similar patch again :) Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 06:40:39 +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > Current ASoC will ignore already connected component when binding Card. > This will happen mainly "CPU Component" is handled as "Platform Component", > which was needed before. > > static int snd_soc_rtd_add_component(...) > { > ... > for_each_rtd_components(rtd, i, comp) { > /* already connected */ > if (comp == component) > return 0; > } > ... > } > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/6] ASoC: fsl: remove unnecessary dai_link->platform commit: 33683cbf49b5412061cb1e4c876063fdef86def4 [2/6] ASoC: atmel: remove unnecessary dai_link->platform commit: 2f650f87c03cab72e751fc739f42a1e257bdc6b9 [3/6] ASoC: ti: remove unnecessary dai_link->platform commit: 3b0db249cf8fe0027e2a4161d27a8566d82fcd80 [4/6] ASoC: soc-topology.c: remove unnecessary dai_link->platform commit: e7098ba9b3785d626326040d300f95fec79aa765 [5/6] ASoC: simple-card-utils.c: remove unnecessary dai_link->platform (no commit info) [6/6] ASoC: simple-card.c: add missing of_node_put() commit: 92405802a7d6aa1953915af869192296d1792d18 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark