Message ID | 20230215130605.31583-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | selftests/resctrl: Fixes to error handling logic and cleanups | expand |
Hi Ilpo, On 2/15/2023 5:05 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > malloc_and_init_memory() in fill_buf isn't checking if memalign() > successfully allocated memory or not before accessing the memory. > > Check the return value of memalign() and return NULL if allocating > aligned memory fails. > > Fixes: a2561b12fe39 ("selftests/resctrl: Add built in benchmark") > Co-developed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> > --- Thank you. Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Reinette
Hi Ilpo, On 2/15/2023 5:05 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > resctrl_val() assumes ->setup() always returns either 0 to continue > tests or < 0 in case of the normal termination of tests after x runs. > The latter overlaps with normal error returns. > > Define END_OF_TESTS (=1) to differentiate the normal termination of > tests and return errors as negative values. Alter callers of ->setup() > to handle errors properly. > > Fixes: 790bf585b0ee ("selftests/resctrl: Add Cache Allocation Technology (CAT) selftest") > Fixes: ecdbb911f22d ("selftests/resctrl: Add MBM test") > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> > --- Thank you Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Reinette
Hi Ilpo, On 2/15/2023 5:06 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > memalign() is obsolete according to its manpage. > > Replace memalign() with posix_memalign() and remove malloc.h include > that was there for memalign(). > > As a pointer is passed into posix_memalign(), initialize *p to NULL > to silence a warning about the function's return value being used as > uninitialized (which is not valid anyway because the error is properly > checked before p is returned). > > Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> > --- Thank you Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Reinette
Hi Ilpo, On 2/15/2023 5:06 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> > > CBM_MASK_PATH is actually the path to resctrl/info. > > Change the macro name to correctly indicate what it represents. > > [ ij: Tweaked the changelog. ] > > Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> > --- Thank you Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Reinette
Hi Ilpo, On 2/15/2023 5:06 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > get_llc_perf() function comment refers to cpu_no parameter that does > not exist. > > Correct get_llc_perf() the comment to document llc_perf_miss instead. "Correct the get_llc_perf() comment"? This is so minor and I do not think a reason to resubmit whole series. > > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> > --- Thank you Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Reinette
Hi Ilpo, On 2/15/2023 5:05 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > This series fixes a few cleanup/error handling problems and cleans up > code. > Thank you very much. These are great cleanups. Looks like I missed sending one response with the others but at this time all patches in this series should have my Reviewed-by tag. If the Kselftest team finds them acceptable I hope that they can help to route them upstream. Reinette