Message ID | 20230121153639.15402-4-sorganov@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [v1,1/7] serial: imx: factor-out common code to imx_uart_soft_reset() | expand |
Hi Stefan, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> writes: > Hi Sergey, > > Am 21.01.23 um 16:36 schrieb Sergey Organov: >> Do not call uart_handle_sysrq_char() if we got any receive error >> along with the character, as we don't want random junk to be >> considered a sysrq. >> Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> > > this looks like a bugfix to me. Since the relevant code is pretty old, > i'm not sure about the fixes tag here: > > Fixes: 279a9acc9b72 ("2.6.11 import") ? Dunno. I've checked a few drivers, and it seems that they don't care either, e.g., look at atmel_serial.c, or mpc52xx_uart.c. Either it doesn't matter, or a few drivers need similar fix? What's going on here, I wonder? Thanks, -- Sergey Organov
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c index e7fce31e460d..e709118fe85c 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c @@ -911,9 +911,6 @@ static irqreturn_t __imx_uart_rxint(int irq, void *dev_id) continue; } - if (uart_handle_sysrq_char(&sport->port, (unsigned char)rx)) - continue; - if (unlikely(rx & URXD_ERR)) { if (rx & URXD_BRK) sport->port.icount.brk++; @@ -942,6 +939,8 @@ static irqreturn_t __imx_uart_rxint(int irq, void *dev_id) flg = TTY_OVERRUN; sport->port.sysrq = 0; + } else if (uart_handle_sysrq_char(&sport->port, (unsigned char)rx)) { + continue; } if (sport->port.ignore_status_mask & URXD_DUMMY_READ)
Do not call uart_handle_sysrq_char() if we got any receive error along with the character, as we don't want random junk to be considered a sysrq. Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> --- drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)