Message ID | 20221107155825.1644604-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Update cache properties for arm64 DTS | expand |
On 07/11/2022 16:56, Pierre Gondois wrote: > v2: > - Update/Add patches for missed cache properties requiring to be > updated for the following platforns: bcm, amazon, arm, exynos, > freescale, marvell, mediatek, nvidia, socinext, tesla, ti. > Missed cache properties were detected using Rob Herring's branch: > https://github.com/robherring/dt-schema/tree/cache-rework > - v1 of exynos, tesla were merged. So you now duplicated the properties... You need to explicitly ask for a patch to be dropped. This cannot be sent like this because it is unmanageable. 1. Split the patchset per sub arch: "Sending of the message failed. An error occurred while sending mail. The mail server responded: Your message has too many recipients. For more information regarding Google's sending limits, please visit: https://support.google.com/mail/?p=TooManyRecipientsError w8-20020ac24428000000b00492ea54beeasm1344368lfl.306 - gsmtp. Please check the message recipient "chris.obbard@collabora.com" and try again." 2. Ask explicitly for dropping already merged patches (I assume they are incorrect if you send v2 of them). 3. Use subject prefixes matching the subsystem (git log --oneline -- ...). 4. Send such patches only to interested parties, not as part of everything. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 11/7/22 18:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 07/11/2022 16:57, Pierre Gondois wrote: >> The DeviceTree Specification v0.3 specifies that the cache node >> 'compatible' and 'cache-level' properties are 'required'. Cf. >> s3.8 Multi-level and Shared Cache Nodes >> The 'cache-unified' property should be present if one of the >> properties for unified cache is present ('cache-size', ...). > > No. This was applied and subject has wrong prefix. > > Trim your CC list because it's impossible to reply (without manually > removing people). > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > Yes, this patch must be dropped. I will do as you suggested in the cover letter, Sorry for the trouble, Regards, Pierre
On 11/7/22 18:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 07/11/2022 16:57, Pierre Gondois wrote: >> The DeviceTree Specification v0.3 specifies that the cache node >> 'compatible' and 'cache-level' properties are 'required'. Cf. >> s3.8 Multi-level and Shared Cache Nodes >> The 'cache-unified' property should be present if one of the >> properties for unified cache is present ('cache-size', ...). >> >> Update the Device Trees accordingly. > > Why do you send it again? This was applied. > > What is more - you have way too many recipients. Mail servers reject it. > It's impossible even to reply to it... > >> cache-sets = <2048>; > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > Yes, this patch must be dropped. Sorry for the trouble, Regards, Pierre