Message ID | 20221029115937.179788-1-chenweilong@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [next,v9,1/4] i2c: hisi: Add initial device tree support | expand |
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 07:59:36PM +0800, Weilong Chen wrote: > The HiSilicon I2C controller can be used on embedded platform, which > boot from devicetree. ... > +#include <linux/acpi.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> Why? ... > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI Why? ... > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF Why? ... > - .acpi_match_table = hisi_i2c_acpi_ids, > + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(hisi_i2c_acpi_ids), Why? ... > + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(hisi_i2c_dts_ids), Why of_match_ptr()?
On 2022/10/31 6:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 07:59:36PM +0800, Weilong Chen wrote: >> The HiSilicon I2C controller can be used on embedded platform, which >> boot from devicetree. > ... > >> +#include <linux/acpi.h> >> +#include <linux/of.h> > Why? > > ... > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > Why? > > ... > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > Why? > > ... > >> - .acpi_match_table = hisi_i2c_acpi_ids, >> + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(hisi_i2c_acpi_ids), > Why? > > ... > >> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(hisi_i2c_dts_ids), > Why of_match_ptr()? There's a lot of drivers use of_match_ptr/ACPI_PTR to protect the of_device_id and have explicit headers file references to linux/acpi.h or linux/of.h, such as drivers/media/platform/intel/pxa_camera.c, bluetooth/hci_intel.c, platform/x86/intel/chtwc_int33fe.c, platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c and so on. The acpi.h and of.h have a nice function or macro definition if CONFIG_OF/ACPI is not satisfy, for example: #define ACPI_PTR(_ptr) (_ptr) vs #define ACPI_PTR(_ptr) (NULL) and also a lot of 'static inline' function there. Seems a good idea to remove all of them, the codes your noted may look a bit verbose there , But I think it is valuable for a driver and device ,telling users it support acpi boot or is it just embedded. Thanks for review. Best Regards. >
On 2022/10/31 23:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 09:57:51AM +0800, chenweilong wrote: >> On 2022/10/31 6:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 07:59:36PM +0800, Weilong Chen wrote: >>>> The HiSilicon I2C controller can be used on embedded platform, which >>>> boot from devicetree. >>> ... >>> >>>> +#include <linux/acpi.h> >>>> +#include <linux/of.h> >>> Why? >>> >>> ... >>> >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI >>> Why? >>> >>> ... >>> >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF >>> Why? >>> >>> ... >>> >>>> - .acpi_match_table = hisi_i2c_acpi_ids, >>>> + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(hisi_i2c_acpi_ids), >>> Why? >>> >>> ... >>> >>>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(hisi_i2c_dts_ids), >>> Why of_match_ptr()? >> There's a lot of drivers use of_match_ptr/ACPI_PTR to protect the of_device_id and >> have explicit headers file references to linux/acpi.h or linux/of.h, such as >> drivers/media/platform/intel/pxa_camera.c, >> bluetooth/hci_intel.c, >> platform/x86/intel/chtwc_int33fe.c, >> platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c and so on. > We have a lot of the legacy or not-up-to-dated to all new kernel APIs code. > Does it justify not to use the new approach in the new contribution? > > ... > >> The acpi.h and of.h have a nice function or macro definition if CONFIG_OF/ACPI is not satisfy, >> for example: >> >> #define ACPI_PTR(_ptr) (_ptr) vs #define ACPI_PTR(_ptr) (NULL) >> >> and also a lot of 'static inline' function there. > And why do you need it? > > ... > >> Seems a good idea to remove all of them, the codes your noted may look a bit >> verbose there. But I think it is valuable for a driver and device ,telling >> users it support acpi boot or is it just embedded. > So, what do we gain here? > > (Fill the "Advantages of your code" section below) > > Disadvantages of your code: > - ugly ifdeffery which we usually do not appreciate > - in some cases it's good to have OF ID table on ACPI platforms (see what > PRP0001 trick is) > - use old approach for the compiler on how to avoid warnings of the static > variables being defined and not used (note, neither ACPI_PTR() nor > of_match_ptr() provides a new approach on that, so you have to amend them > first) > - as a side effect additional headers to be included that are used for 1% or > less of their capacity and slow down the compilation Thanks very much for your detailed explanation. By the way, is it valuable to make a cleanup for the legacy not-up-to-dated drivers? There's lots of of_match_ptr or ACPI_PTR... Best Regards.
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig index e50f9603d189..a7bfddf08fa7 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig @@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ config I2C_HIGHLANDER config I2C_HISI tristate "HiSilicon I2C controller" - depends on (ARM64 && ACPI) || COMPILE_TEST + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST help Say Y here if you want to have Hisilicon I2C controller support available on the Kunpeng Server. diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hisi.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hisi.c index 76c3d8f6fc3c..0fc9400e9e92 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hisi.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-hisi.c @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ * Copyright (c) 2021 HiSilicon Technologies Co., Ltd. */ +#include <linux/acpi.h> #include <linux/bits.h> #include <linux/bitfield.h> #include <linux/completion.h> @@ -13,6 +14,7 @@ #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h> +#include <linux/of.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/property.h> #include <linux/units.h> @@ -483,17 +485,28 @@ static int hisi_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return 0; } +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI static const struct acpi_device_id hisi_i2c_acpi_ids[] = { { "HISI03D1", 0 }, { } }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, hisi_i2c_acpi_ids); +#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_OF +static const struct of_device_id hisi_i2c_dts_ids[] = { + { .compatible = "hisilicon,ascend910-i2c", }, + { } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, hisi_i2c_dts_ids); +#endif static struct platform_driver hisi_i2c_driver = { .probe = hisi_i2c_probe, .driver = { .name = "hisi-i2c", - .acpi_match_table = hisi_i2c_acpi_ids, + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(hisi_i2c_acpi_ids), + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(hisi_i2c_dts_ids), }, }; module_platform_driver(hisi_i2c_driver);