Message ID | 20220907233308.4153-1-aeasi@marvell.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Tracing: Compile error with qla2xxx | expand |
On 9/7/22 16:33, Arun Easi wrote: > diff --git a/include/linux/trace.h b/include/linux/trace.h > index bf16961..b5e16e4 100644 > --- a/include/linux/trace.h > +++ b/include/linux/trace.h > @@ -2,8 +2,6 @@ > #ifndef _LINUX_TRACE_H > #define _LINUX_TRACE_H > > -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING > - > #define TRACE_EXPORT_FUNCTION BIT(0) > #define TRACE_EXPORT_EVENT BIT(1) > #define TRACE_EXPORT_MARKER BIT(2) > @@ -28,6 +26,8 @@ struct trace_export { > int flags; > }; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING > + > int register_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export); > int unregister_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export); > > @@ -48,6 +48,38 @@ void osnoise_arch_unregister(void); > void osnoise_trace_irq_entry(int id); > void osnoise_trace_irq_exit(int id, const char *desc); > > +#else /* CONFIG_TRACING */ > +static inline int register_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export) > +{ > + return -EINVAL; > +} > +static inline int unregister_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > +static inline void trace_printk_init_buffers(void) > +{ > +} > +static inline int trace_array_printk(struct trace_array *tr, unsigned long ip, > + const char *fmt, ...) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > +static inline int trace_array_init_printk(struct trace_array *tr) > +{ > + return -EINVAL; > +} > +static inline void trace_array_put(struct trace_array *tr) > +{ > +} > +static inline struct trace_array *trace_array_get_by_name(const char *name) > +{ > + return NULL; > +} > +static inline int trace_array_destroy(struct trace_array *tr) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > #endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */ > > #endif /* _LINUX_TRACE_H */ Thanks for having addressed my feedback. The above looks good to me. However, I'm not very familiar with the tracing framework so I will leave it to others to formally review this patch. Thanks, Bart.
On Thu, 8 Sep 2022, 9:55am, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > On 9/7/22 16:33, Arun Easi wrote: > > diff --git a/include/linux/trace.h b/include/linux/trace.h > > index bf16961..b5e16e4 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/trace.h > > +++ b/include/linux/trace.h > > @@ -2,8 +2,6 @@ > > #ifndef _LINUX_TRACE_H > > #define _LINUX_TRACE_H > > -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING > > - > > #define TRACE_EXPORT_FUNCTION BIT(0) > > #define TRACE_EXPORT_EVENT BIT(1) > > #define TRACE_EXPORT_MARKER BIT(2) > > @@ -28,6 +26,8 @@ struct trace_export { > > int flags; > > }; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING > > + > > int register_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export); > > int unregister_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export); > > @@ -48,6 +48,38 @@ void osnoise_arch_unregister(void); > > void osnoise_trace_irq_entry(int id); > > void osnoise_trace_irq_exit(int id, const char *desc); > > +#else /* CONFIG_TRACING */ > > +static inline int register_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export) > > +{ > > + return -EINVAL; > > +} > > +static inline int unregister_ftrace_export(struct trace_export *export) > > +{ > > + return 0; > > +} > > +static inline void trace_printk_init_buffers(void) > > +{ > > +} > > +static inline int trace_array_printk(struct trace_array *tr, unsigned long > > ip, > > + const char *fmt, ...) > > +{ > > + return 0; > > +} > > +static inline int trace_array_init_printk(struct trace_array *tr) > > +{ > > + return -EINVAL; > > +} > > +static inline void trace_array_put(struct trace_array *tr) > > +{ > > +} > > +static inline struct trace_array *trace_array_get_by_name(const char *name) > > +{ > > + return NULL; > > +} > > +static inline int trace_array_destroy(struct trace_array *tr) > > +{ > > + return 0; > > +} > > #endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */ > > #endif /* _LINUX_TRACE_H */ > > Thanks for having addressed my feedback. The above looks good to me. However, > I'm not very familiar with the tracing framework so I will leave it to others > to formally review this patch. > Thanks for the review and suggestion of the clang-format command line, Bart. That is a useful one to remember. Steve, does this look ok? If so, your approval is appreciated, as this is a build blocker fix. Regards, -Arun