mbox series

[v2,0/3] PCI/PM: Always disable PTM for all devices during suspend

Message ID 20220902233543.390890-1-helgaas@kernel.org
Headers show
Series PCI/PM: Always disable PTM for all devices during suspend | expand

Message

Bjorn Helgaas Sept. 2, 2022, 11:35 p.m. UTC
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

We currently disable PTM for Root Ports during suspend.  Leaving PTM
enabled for downstream devices causes UR errors if they send PTM Requests.
The intent of this series is to:

  - Unconditionally disable PTM during suspend (even if the driver saves
    its own state) by moving the disable from pci_prepare_to_sleep() to
    pci_pm_suspend().

  - Disable PTM for all devices by removing the Root Port condition and
    doing it early in the suspend paths.

  - Explicitly re-enable PTM during resume, which requires new support in
    pci_enable_ptm() for Root Ports and Switch Upstream Ports.


Bjorn Helgaas (3):
  PCI/PTM: Preserve PTM Root Select
  PCI/PTM: Implement pci_enable_ptm() for Root Ports, Switch Upstream
    Ports
  PCI/PM: Always disable PTM for all devices during suspend

 drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 drivers/pci/pci.c        | 20 --------------------
 drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c   | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

Comments

Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Sept. 2, 2022, 11:56 p.m. UTC | #1
On 9/2/22 4:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c
> index b6a417247ce3..ad283818f37b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c
> @@ -167,11 +167,11 @@ int pci_enable_ptm(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 *granularity)
>  	if (!pos)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CAP, &cap);
> -	if (!(cap & PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -

May be saving PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ enabled state here and using it below only for
endpoints checks will reduce the code duplication?

>  	/*
> +	 * Root Ports and Switch Upstream Ports have been configured
> +	 * by pci_ptm_init(), so preserve their PCI_PTM_CTRL_ROOT and
> +	 * granularity.
> +	 *
>  	 * For a PCIe Endpoint, PTM is only useful if the endpoint can
>  	 * issue PTM requests to upstream devices that have PTM enabled.
>  	 *
> @@ -179,19 +179,39 @@ int pci_enable_ptm(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 *granularity)
>  	 * device, so there must be some implementation-specific way to
>  	 * associate the endpoint with a time source.
>  	 */
> -	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT) {
> +	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> +	    pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) {
> +		if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) {
> +			ups = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
> +			if (!ups || !ups->ptm_enabled)
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, &ctrl);

Why read PCI_PTM_CTRL state only for root and upstream ports? The same logic
will work for endpoints and RC endpoints right? 

What not use dev->ptm_granularity for root ports?

> +		ctrl |= PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
> +	} else if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT) {
> +		pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CAP, &cap);
> +		if (!(cap & PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
>  		ups = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
>  		if (!ups || !ups->ptm_enabled)
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
>  		dev->ptm_granularity = ups->ptm_granularity;
> +		ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
> +		ctrl |= dev->ptm_granularity << 8;
>  	} else if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) {
> +		pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CAP, &cap);
> +		if (!(cap & PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
>  		dev->ptm_granularity = 0;
> +		ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
> +		ctrl |= dev->ptm_granularity << 8;
>  	} else
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
> -	ctrl |= dev->ptm_granularity << 8;
>  	pci_write_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, ctrl);
>  	dev->ptm_enabled = 1;
>
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan Sept. 2, 2022, 11:59 p.m. UTC | #2
On 9/2/22 4:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> 
> We want to disable PTM on Root Ports because that allows some chips, e.g.,
> Intel mobile chips since Coffee Lake, to enter a lower-power PM state.
> 
> That means we also have to disable PTM on downstream devices.  PCIe r6.0,
> sec 2.2.8, recommends that functions support generation of messages in
> non-D0 states, so we have to assume Switch Upstream Ports or Endpoints may
> send PTM Requests while in D1, D2, and D3hot.  A PTM message received by a
> Downstream Port (including a Root Port) with PTM disabled must be treated
> as an Unsupported Request (sec 6.21.3).
> 
> PTM was previously disabled only for Root Ports, and it was disabled in
> pci_prepare_to_sleep(), which is not called at all if a driver supports
> legacy PM or does its own state saving.
> 
> Instead, disable PTM early in pci_pm_suspend() and pci_pm_runtime_suspend()
> so we do it in all cases.
> 
> Previously PTM was disabled *after* saving device state, so the state
> restore on resume automatically re-enabled it.  Since we now disable PTM
> *before* saving state, we must explicitly re-enable it.
> 
> Here's a sample of errors that occur when PTM is disabled only on the Root
> Port.  With this topology:
> 
>   0000:00:1d.0 Root Port            to [bus 08-71]
>   0000:08:00.0 Switch Upstream Port to [bus 09-71]
> 
> Kai-Heng reported errors like this:
> 
>   pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Uncorrected (Non-Fatal) error received: 0000:00:1d.0
>   pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Requester ID)
>   pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:   device [8086:7ab0] error status/mask=00100000/00004000
>   pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:    [20] UnsupReq               (First)
>   pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER:   TLP Header: 34000000 08000052 00000000 00000000
> 
> Decoding TLP header 0x34...... (0011 0100b) and 0x08000052:
> 
>   Fmt                         001b  4 DW header, no data
>   Type                     1 0100b  Msg (Local - Terminate at Receiver)
>   Requester ID  0x0800              Bus 08 Devfn 00.0
>   Message Code    0x52  0101 0010b  PTM Request
> 
> The 00:1d.0 Root Port logged an Unsupported Request error when it received
> a PTM Request with Requester ID 08:00.0.
> 
> Fixes: a697f072f5da ("PCI: Disable PTM during suspend to save power")
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215453
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216210
> Based-on: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220706123244.18056-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com
> Based-on-patch-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> Reported-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  drivers/pci/pci.c        | 20 --------------------
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> index 2815922ac525..115febaa7e0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> @@ -772,6 +772,12 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>  	const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Disabling PTM allows some systems, e.g., Intel mobile chips
> +	 * since Coffee Lake, to enter a lower-power PM state.
> +	 */
> +	pci_disable_ptm(pci_dev);

I think you can use "if (pci_dev->ptm_enabled)" check for pci_disable_ptm()
as well. This will avoid unnecessary checks in pci_disable_ptm().

> +
>  	pci_dev->skip_bus_pm = false;
>  
>  	if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev))
> @@ -982,6 +988,9 @@ static int pci_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	if (pci_dev->state_saved)
>  		pci_restore_standard_config(pci_dev);
>  
> +	if (pci_dev->ptm_enabled)
> +		pci_enable_ptm(pci_dev, NULL);
> +
>  	if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev))
>  		return pci_legacy_resume(dev);
>  
> @@ -1269,6 +1278,8 @@ static int pci_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	pci_power_t prev = pci_dev->current_state;
>  	int error;
>  
> +	pci_disable_ptm(pci_dev);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If pci_dev->driver is not set (unbound), we leave the device in D0,
>  	 * but it may go to D3cold when the bridge above it runtime suspends.
> @@ -1331,6 +1342,9 @@ static int pci_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>  	 */
>  	pci_pm_default_resume_early(pci_dev);
>  
> +	if (pci_dev->ptm_enabled)
> +		pci_enable_ptm(pci_dev, NULL);
> +
>  	if (!pci_dev->driver)
>  		return 0;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 95bc329e74c0..b0e2968c8cca 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -2706,16 +2706,6 @@ int pci_prepare_to_sleep(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	if (target_state == PCI_POWER_ERROR)
>  		return -EIO;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * There are systems (for example, Intel mobile chips since Coffee
> -	 * Lake) where the power drawn while suspended can be significantly
> -	 * reduced by disabling PTM on PCIe root ports as this allows the
> -	 * port to enter a lower-power PM state and the SoC to reach a
> -	 * lower-power idle state as a whole.
> -	 */
> -	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
> -		pci_disable_ptm(dev);
> -
>  	pci_enable_wake(dev, target_state, wakeup);
>  
>  	error = pci_set_power_state(dev, target_state);
> @@ -2764,16 +2754,6 @@ int pci_finish_runtime_suspend(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  	if (target_state == PCI_POWER_ERROR)
>  		return -EIO;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * There are systems (for example, Intel mobile chips since Coffee
> -	 * Lake) where the power drawn while suspended can be significantly
> -	 * reduced by disabling PTM on PCIe root ports as this allows the
> -	 * port to enter a lower-power PM state and the SoC to reach a
> -	 * lower-power idle state as a whole.
> -	 */
> -	if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
> -		pci_disable_ptm(dev);
> -
>  	__pci_enable_wake(dev, target_state, pci_dev_run_wake(dev));
>  
>  	error = pci_set_power_state(dev, target_state);
Rafael J. Wysocki Sept. 3, 2022, 5:13 p.m. UTC | #3
On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 1:59 AM Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/2/22 4:35 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >
> > We want to disable PTM on Root Ports because that allows some chips, e.g.,
> > Intel mobile chips since Coffee Lake, to enter a lower-power PM state.
> >
> > That means we also have to disable PTM on downstream devices.  PCIe r6.0,
> > sec 2.2.8, recommends that functions support generation of messages in
> > non-D0 states, so we have to assume Switch Upstream Ports or Endpoints may
> > send PTM Requests while in D1, D2, and D3hot.  A PTM message received by a
> > Downstream Port (including a Root Port) with PTM disabled must be treated
> > as an Unsupported Request (sec 6.21.3).
> >
> > PTM was previously disabled only for Root Ports, and it was disabled in
> > pci_prepare_to_sleep(), which is not called at all if a driver supports
> > legacy PM or does its own state saving.
> >
> > Instead, disable PTM early in pci_pm_suspend() and pci_pm_runtime_suspend()
> > so we do it in all cases.
> >
> > Previously PTM was disabled *after* saving device state, so the state
> > restore on resume automatically re-enabled it.  Since we now disable PTM
> > *before* saving state, we must explicitly re-enable it.
> >
> > Here's a sample of errors that occur when PTM is disabled only on the Root
> > Port.  With this topology:
> >
> >   0000:00:1d.0 Root Port            to [bus 08-71]
> >   0000:08:00.0 Switch Upstream Port to [bus 09-71]
> >
> > Kai-Heng reported errors like this:
> >
> >   pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER: Uncorrected (Non-Fatal) error received: 0000:00:1d.0
> >   pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fatal), type=Transaction Layer, (Requester ID)
> >   pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:   device [8086:7ab0] error status/mask=00100000/00004000
> >   pcieport 0000:00:1d.0:    [20] UnsupReq               (First)
> >   pcieport 0000:00:1d.0: AER:   TLP Header: 34000000 08000052 00000000 00000000
> >
> > Decoding TLP header 0x34...... (0011 0100b) and 0x08000052:
> >
> >   Fmt                         001b  4 DW header, no data
> >   Type                     1 0100b  Msg (Local - Terminate at Receiver)
> >   Requester ID  0x0800              Bus 08 Devfn 00.0
> >   Message Code    0x52  0101 0010b  PTM Request
> >
> > The 00:1d.0 Root Port logged an Unsupported Request error when it received
> > a PTM Request with Requester ID 08:00.0.
> >
> > Fixes: a697f072f5da ("PCI: Disable PTM during suspend to save power")
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215453
> > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216210
> > Based-on: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220706123244.18056-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com
> > Based-on-patch-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> > Reported-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/pci/pci.c        | 20 --------------------
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > index 2815922ac525..115febaa7e0b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > @@ -772,6 +772,12 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >       struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> >       const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
> >
> > +     /*
> > +      * Disabling PTM allows some systems, e.g., Intel mobile chips
> > +      * since Coffee Lake, to enter a lower-power PM state.
> > +      */
> > +     pci_disable_ptm(pci_dev);
>
> I think you can use "if (pci_dev->ptm_enabled)" check for pci_disable_ptm()
> as well. This will avoid unnecessary checks in pci_disable_ptm().

Or use that check in pci_disable_ptm() instead of the pci_is_pcie() one.

Also, I would remae pci_disable_ptm() to pci_suspend_ptm() (because
its role is to temporarily disable PTM for system-wide suspend) and
introduc pci_resume_ptm() that will do

if (pci_dev->ptm_enabled)
        pci_enable_ptm(pci_dev, NULL);

> > +
> >       pci_dev->skip_bus_pm = false;
> >
> >       if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev))
> > @@ -982,6 +988,9 @@ static int pci_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
> >       if (pci_dev->state_saved)
> >               pci_restore_standard_config(pci_dev);
> >
> > +     if (pci_dev->ptm_enabled)
> > +             pci_enable_ptm(pci_dev, NULL);
> > +
> >       if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev))
> >               return pci_legacy_resume(dev);
> >
> > @@ -1269,6 +1278,8 @@ static int pci_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >       pci_power_t prev = pci_dev->current_state;
> >       int error;
> >
> > +     pci_disable_ptm(pci_dev);
> > +
> >       /*
> >        * If pci_dev->driver is not set (unbound), we leave the device in D0,
> >        * but it may go to D3cold when the bridge above it runtime suspends.
> > @@ -1331,6 +1342,9 @@ static int pci_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> >        */
> >       pci_pm_default_resume_early(pci_dev);
> >
> > +     if (pci_dev->ptm_enabled)
> > +             pci_enable_ptm(pci_dev, NULL);
> > +
> >       if (!pci_dev->driver)
> >               return 0;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index 95bc329e74c0..b0e2968c8cca 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -2706,16 +2706,6 @@ int pci_prepare_to_sleep(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >       if (target_state == PCI_POWER_ERROR)
> >               return -EIO;
> >
> > -     /*
> > -      * There are systems (for example, Intel mobile chips since Coffee
> > -      * Lake) where the power drawn while suspended can be significantly
> > -      * reduced by disabling PTM on PCIe root ports as this allows the
> > -      * port to enter a lower-power PM state and the SoC to reach a
> > -      * lower-power idle state as a whole.
> > -      */
> > -     if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
> > -             pci_disable_ptm(dev);
> > -
> >       pci_enable_wake(dev, target_state, wakeup);
> >
> >       error = pci_set_power_state(dev, target_state);
> > @@ -2764,16 +2754,6 @@ int pci_finish_runtime_suspend(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >       if (target_state == PCI_POWER_ERROR)
> >               return -EIO;
> >
> > -     /*
> > -      * There are systems (for example, Intel mobile chips since Coffee
> > -      * Lake) where the power drawn while suspended can be significantly
> > -      * reduced by disabling PTM on PCIe root ports as this allows the
> > -      * port to enter a lower-power PM state and the SoC to reach a
> > -      * lower-power idle state as a whole.
> > -      */
> > -     if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
> > -             pci_disable_ptm(dev);
> > -
> >       __pci_enable_wake(dev, target_state, pci_dev_run_wake(dev));
> >
> >       error = pci_set_power_state(dev, target_state);
>
> --
> Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
> Linux Kernel Developer
Rafael J. Wysocki Sept. 3, 2022, 5:40 p.m. UTC | #4
On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 1:35 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c
> index b6a417247ce3..ad283818f37b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c
> @@ -167,11 +167,11 @@ int pci_enable_ptm(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 *granularity)
>         if (!pos)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> -       pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CAP, &cap);
> -       if (!(cap & PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ))
> -               return -EINVAL;
> -
>         /*
> +        * Root Ports and Switch Upstream Ports have been configured
> +        * by pci_ptm_init(), so preserve their PCI_PTM_CTRL_ROOT and
> +        * granularity.
> +        *
>          * For a PCIe Endpoint, PTM is only useful if the endpoint can
>          * issue PTM requests to upstream devices that have PTM enabled.
>          *
> @@ -179,19 +179,39 @@ int pci_enable_ptm(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 *granularity)
>          * device, so there must be some implementation-specific way to
>          * associate the endpoint with a time source.
>          */
> -       if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT) {
> +       if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> +           pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) {
> +               if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) {
> +                       ups = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
> +                       if (!ups || !ups->ptm_enabled)
> +                               return -EINVAL;
> +               }
> +
> +               pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, &ctrl);
> +               ctrl |= PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
> +       } else if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT) {
> +               pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CAP, &cap);
> +               if (!(cap & PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ))
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +
>                 ups = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
>                 if (!ups || !ups->ptm_enabled)
>                         return -EINVAL;
>
>                 dev->ptm_granularity = ups->ptm_granularity;
> +               ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
> +               ctrl |= dev->ptm_granularity << 8;
>         } else if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) {
> +               pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CAP, &cap);
> +               if (!(cap & PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ))
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +
>                 dev->ptm_granularity = 0;
> +               ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
> +               ctrl |= dev->ptm_granularity << 8;
>         } else
>                 return -EINVAL;

I would do

if ((pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM || pci_pcie_type(dev)
== PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT)) {
        ups = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
        if (!ups || !ups->ptm_enabled)
                return -EINVAL;

        dev->ptm_granularity = ups->ptm_granularity;
}

switch(pci_pcie_type(dev)) {
case PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT:
case PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM:
        pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, &ctrl);
        ctrl |= PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
        break;
case PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT:
case PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END:
        ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
        break;
default:
        return -EINVAL;
}

>
> -       ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
> -       ctrl |= dev->ptm_granularity << 8;

And I wouldn't remove the line above.

Note that for root ports dev->ptm_granularity must be set and reflect
the register setting or else the code wouldn't have worked for
downstream components.

>         pci_write_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, ctrl);
>         dev->ptm_enabled = 1;
>
> --
Rafael J. Wysocki Sept. 3, 2022, 5:42 p.m. UTC | #5
On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 7:40 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 1:35 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c
> > index b6a417247ce3..ad283818f37b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/ptm.c
> > @@ -167,11 +167,11 @@ int pci_enable_ptm(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 *granularity)
> >         if (!pos)
> >                 return -EINVAL;
> >
> > -       pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CAP, &cap);
> > -       if (!(cap & PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ))
> > -               return -EINVAL;
> > -
> >         /*
> > +        * Root Ports and Switch Upstream Ports have been configured
> > +        * by pci_ptm_init(), so preserve their PCI_PTM_CTRL_ROOT and
> > +        * granularity.
> > +        *
> >          * For a PCIe Endpoint, PTM is only useful if the endpoint can
> >          * issue PTM requests to upstream devices that have PTM enabled.
> >          *
> > @@ -179,19 +179,39 @@ int pci_enable_ptm(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 *granularity)
> >          * device, so there must be some implementation-specific way to
> >          * associate the endpoint with a time source.
> >          */
> > -       if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT) {
> > +       if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> > +           pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) {
> > +               if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM) {
> > +                       ups = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
> > +                       if (!ups || !ups->ptm_enabled)
> > +                               return -EINVAL;
> > +               }
> > +
> > +               pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, &ctrl);
> > +               ctrl |= PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
> > +       } else if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT) {
> > +               pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CAP, &cap);
> > +               if (!(cap & PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ))
> > +                       return -EINVAL;
> > +
> >                 ups = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
> >                 if (!ups || !ups->ptm_enabled)
> >                         return -EINVAL;
> >
> >                 dev->ptm_granularity = ups->ptm_granularity;
> > +               ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
> > +               ctrl |= dev->ptm_granularity << 8;
> >         } else if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END) {
> > +               pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CAP, &cap);
> > +               if (!(cap & PCI_PTM_CAP_REQ))
> > +                       return -EINVAL;
> > +
> >                 dev->ptm_granularity = 0;
> > +               ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
> > +               ctrl |= dev->ptm_granularity << 8;
> >         } else
> >                 return -EINVAL;
>
> I would do
>
> if ((pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM || pci_pcie_type(dev)
> == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT)) {
>         ups = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
>         if (!ups || !ups->ptm_enabled)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         dev->ptm_granularity = ups->ptm_granularity;
> }
>
> switch(pci_pcie_type(dev)) {
> case PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT:
> case PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM:
>         pci_read_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, &ctrl);
>         ctrl |= PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
>         break;
> case PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT:
> case PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END:

I missed the cap check here, sorry.

>         ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
>         break;
> default:
>         return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> >
> > -       ctrl = PCI_PTM_CTRL_ENABLE;
> > -       ctrl |= dev->ptm_granularity << 8;
>
> And I wouldn't remove the line above.
>
> Note that for root ports dev->ptm_granularity must be set and reflect
> the register setting or else the code wouldn't have worked for
> downstream components.
>
> >         pci_write_config_dword(dev, pos + PCI_PTM_CTRL, ctrl);
> >         dev->ptm_enabled = 1;
> >
> > --