Message ID | 20220718145038.1114379-2-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 50e53291e9f188a44652f11606ae6b544facdccc |
Headers | show |
Series | [v4,1/4] thermal/core: Encapsulate the trip point crossed function | expand |
On 18/07/2022 16:50, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > As the trip temperature is already available when calling the function > handle_critical_trips(), pass it as a parameter instead of having this > function calling the ops again to retrieve the same data. > > Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > --- > v3: > - Massaged the patch title and the description > --- > drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 8 ++------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) I'll apply this patch individually Thanks -- D.
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c index fa5767c6d5f4..fc6ccc5edbfb 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c @@ -340,12 +340,8 @@ void thermal_zone_device_critical(struct thermal_zone_device *tz) EXPORT_SYMBOL(thermal_zone_device_critical); static void handle_critical_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, - int trip, enum thermal_trip_type trip_type) + int trip, int trip_temp, enum thermal_trip_type trip_type) { - int trip_temp; - - tz->ops->get_trip_temp(tz, trip, &trip_temp); - /* If we have not crossed the trip_temp, we do not care. */ if (trip_temp <= 0 || tz->temperature < trip_temp) return; @@ -394,7 +390,7 @@ static void handle_thermal_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip) handle_thermal_trip_crossed(tz, trip, trip_temp, hyst, type); if (type == THERMAL_TRIP_CRITICAL || type == THERMAL_TRIP_HOT) - handle_critical_trips(tz, trip, type); + handle_critical_trips(tz, trip, trip_temp, type); else handle_non_critical_trips(tz, trip); /*