Message ID | 20220712095901.212353-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | build fixes | expand |
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 03:28:58PM +0530, Richard Henderson wrote: > This is a collection of fixes required to get CI back to green. > Given that 2 of 3 apply to cirrus, I had to push them to staging to > even try them. Since it worked, I've now pushed them to master. FWIW, it is possible to test Cirrus CI fixes in your own personal fork too, but it needs a little extra setup first, detailed in .gitlab-ci.d/cirrus/README.rst With regards, Daniel
On 7/12/22 15:43, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 03:28:58PM +0530, Richard Henderson wrote: >> This is a collection of fixes required to get CI back to green. >> Given that 2 of 3 apply to cirrus, I had to push them to staging to >> even try them. Since it worked, I've now pushed them to master. > > FWIW, it is possible to test Cirrus CI fixes in your own personal > fork too, but it needs a little extra setup first, detailed in > > .gitlab-ci.d/cirrus/README.rst How many of the 'github' strings therein should really be 'gitlab'? r~
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 03:56:54PM +0530, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 7/12/22 15:43, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 03:28:58PM +0530, Richard Henderson wrote: > > > This is a collection of fixes required to get CI back to green. > > > Given that 2 of 3 apply to cirrus, I had to push them to staging to > > > even try them. Since it worked, I've now pushed them to master. > > > > FWIW, it is possible to test Cirrus CI fixes in your own personal > > fork too, but it needs a little extra setup first, detailed in > > > > .gitlab-ci.d/cirrus/README.rst > > How many of the 'github' strings therein should really be 'gitlab'? None actually, this is all part of the (gross) hack. Cirrus CI officially only integrates with GitHub, so we need a dummy GitHub repo there. Once the job starts though, it actually pulls the real code from gitlab. With regards, Daniel
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 4:33 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 03:56:54PM +0530, Richard Henderson wrote: > > On 7/12/22 15:43, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 03:28:58PM +0530, Richard Henderson wrote: > > > > This is a collection of fixes required to get CI back to green. > > > > Given that 2 of 3 apply to cirrus, I had to push them to staging to > > > > even try them. Since it worked, I've now pushed them to master. > > > > > > FWIW, it is possible to test Cirrus CI fixes in your own personal > > > fork too, but it needs a little extra setup first, detailed in > > > > > > .gitlab-ci.d/cirrus/README.rst > > > > How many of the 'github' strings therein should really be 'gitlab'? > > None actually, this is all part of the (gross) hack. Cirrus CI officially > only integrates with GitHub, so we need a dummy GitHub repo there. Once > the job starts though, it actually pulls the real code from gitlab. > Yea, fun times that hack... :( Warner