Message ID | 20220523174238.28942-4-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 08f12b4534c274c67245019021961206e7a3eefa |
Headers | show |
Series | [v5,1/5] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Renesas RZ/G2L Interrupt Controller | expand |
Hi Linus, Thank you for the feedback. On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 9:54 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 7:43 PM Lad Prabhakar > <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > > > Allow free() callback to be overridden from irq_domain_ops for > > hierarchical chips. > > > > This allows drivers to free up resources which are allocated during > > child_to_parent_hwirq()/populate_parent_alloc_arg() callbacks. > > > > On Renesas RZ/G2L platform a bitmap is maintained for TINT slots, a slot > > is allocated in child_to_parent_hwirq() callback which is freed up in free > > callback hence this override. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> > > So that function today looks like this: > > static void gpiochip_hierarchy_setup_domain_ops(struct irq_domain_ops *ops) > { > ops->activate = gpiochip_irq_domain_activate; > ops->deactivate = gpiochip_irq_domain_deactivate; > ops->alloc = gpiochip_hierarchy_irq_domain_alloc; > ops->free = irq_domain_free_irqs_common; > > /* > * We only allow overriding the translate() function for > * hierarchical chips, and this should only be done if the user > * really need something other than 1:1 translation. > */ > if (!ops->translate) > ops->translate = gpiochip_hierarchy_irq_domain_translate; > } > > (...) > - ops->free = irq_domain_free_irqs_common; > (...) > > + if (!ops->free) > > + ops->free = irq_domain_free_irqs_common; > > Marc Z is working on cleaning up the way that gpiolib is (ab)using > irqchips. We definitely need his ACK if we do things like this. > This doesn't look like one of the big offenders to me, but I want > to make sure we don't create new problems while Marc is trying > to solve the old ones. > Agreed, I had a discussion with Marc on v3 series [0]. [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/20220511183210.5248-4-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/ Cheers, Prabhakar
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:07 AM Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 9:54 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 7:43 PM Lad Prabhakar > > <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> wrote: > > > > > Allow free() callback to be overridden from irq_domain_ops for > > > hierarchical chips. > > > > > > This allows drivers to free up resources which are allocated during > > > child_to_parent_hwirq()/populate_parent_alloc_arg() callbacks. > > > > > > On Renesas RZ/G2L platform a bitmap is maintained for TINT slots, a slot > > > is allocated in child_to_parent_hwirq() callback which is freed up in free > > > callback hence this override. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> > > > > So that function today looks like this: > > > > static void gpiochip_hierarchy_setup_domain_ops(struct irq_domain_ops *ops) > > { > > ops->activate = gpiochip_irq_domain_activate; > > ops->deactivate = gpiochip_irq_domain_deactivate; > > ops->alloc = gpiochip_hierarchy_irq_domain_alloc; > > ops->free = irq_domain_free_irqs_common; > > > > /* > > * We only allow overriding the translate() function for > > * hierarchical chips, and this should only be done if the user > > * really need something other than 1:1 translation. > > */ > > if (!ops->translate) > > ops->translate = gpiochip_hierarchy_irq_domain_translate; > > } > > > > (...) > > - ops->free = irq_domain_free_irqs_common; > > (...) > > > + if (!ops->free) > > > + ops->free = irq_domain_free_irqs_common; > > > > Marc Z is working on cleaning up the way that gpiolib is (ab)using > > irqchips. We definitely need his ACK if we do things like this. > > This doesn't look like one of the big offenders to me, but I want > > to make sure we don't create new problems while Marc is trying > > to solve the old ones. > > > Agreed, I had a discussion with Marc on v3 series [0]. Hm yeah I guess I am just stepping on Marc's toes with all my mails :( I'll try to just wait for Marc's Reviewed-by instead and not add to the noise, I'm probably just wrong. Yours, Linus Walleij
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index 690035124faa..8fcb9d23fea5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -1187,15 +1187,18 @@ static void gpiochip_hierarchy_setup_domain_ops(struct irq_domain_ops *ops) ops->activate = gpiochip_irq_domain_activate; ops->deactivate = gpiochip_irq_domain_deactivate; ops->alloc = gpiochip_hierarchy_irq_domain_alloc; - ops->free = irq_domain_free_irqs_common; /* - * We only allow overriding the translate() function for + * We only allow overriding the translate() and free() functions for * hierarchical chips, and this should only be done if the user - * really need something other than 1:1 translation. + * really need something other than 1:1 translation for translate() + * callback and free if user wants to free up any resources which + * were allocated during callbacks, for example populate_parent_alloc_arg. */ if (!ops->translate) ops->translate = gpiochip_hierarchy_irq_domain_translate; + if (!ops->free) + ops->free = irq_domain_free_irqs_common; } static int gpiochip_hierarchy_add_domain(struct gpio_chip *gc)