Message ID | 1836239.tdWV9SEqCh@kreacher |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | cpufreq: Locking-related changes in cpufreq_offline() and cpufreq_remove_dev() | expand |
On 11-05-22, 17:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > Currently, cpufreq_remove_dev() invokes the ->exit() driver callback > without holding the policy rwsem which is inconsistent with what > happens if ->exit() is invoked directly from cpufreq_offline(). > > It also manipulates the real_cpus mask and removes the CPU device > symlink without holding the policy rwsem, but cpufreq_offline() holds > the rwsem around the modifications thereof. > > For consistency, modify cpufreq_remove_dev() to hold the policy rwsem > until the ->exit() callback has been called (or it has been determined > that it is not necessary to call it). > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 21 ++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1659,19 +1659,26 @@ static void cpufreq_remove_dev(struct de if (!policy) return; + down_write(&policy->rwsem); + if (cpu_online(cpu)) - cpufreq_offline(cpu); + __cpufreq_offline(cpu, policy); cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, policy->real_cpus); remove_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, dev); - if (cpumask_empty(policy->real_cpus)) { - /* We did light-weight exit earlier, do full tear down now */ - if (cpufreq_driver->offline) - cpufreq_driver->exit(policy); - - cpufreq_policy_free(policy); + if (!cpumask_empty(policy->real_cpus)) { + up_write(&policy->rwsem); + return; } + + /* We did light-weight exit earlier, do full tear down now */ + if (cpufreq_driver->offline) + cpufreq_driver->exit(policy); + + up_write(&policy->rwsem); + + cpufreq_policy_free(policy); } /**