diff mbox series

[3/9] ptrace/um: Replace PT_DTRACE with TIF_SINGLESTEP

Message ID 20220426225211.308418-3-ebiederm@xmission.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series ptrace: cleaning up ptrace_stop | expand

Commit Message

Eric W. Biederman April 26, 2022, 10:52 p.m. UTC 
User mode linux is the last user of the PT_DTRACE flag.  Using the flag to indicate
single stepping is a little confusing and worse changing tsk->ptrace without locking
could potentionally cause problems.

So use a thread info flag with a better name instead of flag in tsk->ptrace.

Remove the definition PT_DTRACE as uml is the last user.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
 arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h | 2 ++
 arch/um/kernel/exec.c             | 2 +-
 arch/um/kernel/process.c          | 2 +-
 arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c           | 8 ++++----
 arch/um/kernel/signal.c           | 4 ++--
 include/linux/ptrace.h            | 1 -
 6 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Johannes Berg April 27, 2022, 7:10 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 17:52 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> User mode linux is the last user of the PT_DTRACE flag.  Using the flag to indicate
> single stepping is a little confusing and worse changing tsk->ptrace without locking
> could potentionally cause problems.
> 
> So use a thread info flag with a better name instead of flag in tsk->ptrace.
> 
> Remove the definition PT_DTRACE as uml is the last user.


Looks fine to me.

Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>

Looking at pending patches, I don't see any conflicts from this. I'm
guessing anyway you'll want/need to take these through some tree all
together.

johannes
Eric W. Biederman April 27, 2022, 1:50 p.m. UTC | #2 
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:

> On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 17:52 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> User mode linux is the last user of the PT_DTRACE flag.  Using the flag to indicate
>> single stepping is a little confusing and worse changing tsk->ptrace without locking
>> could potentionally cause problems.
>> 
>> So use a thread info flag with a better name instead of flag in tsk->ptrace.
>> 
>> Remove the definition PT_DTRACE as uml is the last user.
>
>
> Looks fine to me.
>
> Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>

Thanks.

> Looking at pending patches, I don't see any conflicts from this. I'm
> guessing anyway you'll want/need to take these through some tree all
> together.

Taking them all through a single tree looks like it will be easiest.
So I am planning on taking them through my signal tree.

Now that I think of it, the lack of locking also means I want to
Cc stable.

Eric
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 1395cbd7e340..c7b4b49826a2 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@  static inline struct thread_info *current_thread_info(void)
 #define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK	7
 #define TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME	8
 #define TIF_SECCOMP		9	/* secure computing */
+#define TIF_SINGLESTEP		10	/* single stepping userspace */
 
 #define _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE	(1 << TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)
 #define _TIF_SIGPENDING		(1 << TIF_SIGPENDING)
@@ -68,5 +69,6 @@  static inline struct thread_info *current_thread_info(void)
 #define _TIF_MEMDIE		(1 << TIF_MEMDIE)
 #define _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT	(1 << TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT)
 #define _TIF_SECCOMP		(1 << TIF_SECCOMP)
+#define _TIF_SINGLESTEP		(1 << TIF_SINGLESTEP)
 
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/exec.c b/arch/um/kernel/exec.c
index c85e40c72779..58938d75871a 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/exec.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/exec.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@  void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long eip, unsigned long esp)
 {
 	PT_REGS_IP(regs) = eip;
 	PT_REGS_SP(regs) = esp;
-	current->ptrace &= ~PT_DTRACE;
+	clear_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP);
 #ifdef SUBARCH_EXECVE1
 	SUBARCH_EXECVE1(regs->regs);
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/process.c b/arch/um/kernel/process.c
index 80504680be08..88c5c7844281 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/process.c
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@  int singlestepping(void * t)
 {
 	struct task_struct *task = t ? t : current;
 
-	if (!(task->ptrace & PT_DTRACE))
+	if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (task->thread.singlestep_syscall)
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c
index bfaf6ab1ac03..5154b27de580 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ 
 
 void user_enable_single_step(struct task_struct *child)
 {
-	child->ptrace |= PT_DTRACE;
+	set_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SINGLESTEP);
 	child->thread.singlestep_syscall = 0;
 
 #ifdef SUBARCH_SET_SINGLESTEPPING
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@  void user_enable_single_step(struct task_struct *child)
 
 void user_disable_single_step(struct task_struct *child)
 {
-	child->ptrace &= ~PT_DTRACE;
+	clear_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_SINGLESTEP);
 	child->thread.singlestep_syscall = 0;
 
 #ifdef SUBARCH_SET_SINGLESTEPPING
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@  static void send_sigtrap(struct uml_pt_regs *regs, int error_code)
 }
 
 /*
- * XXX Check PT_DTRACE vs TIF_SINGLESTEP for singlestepping check and
+ * XXX Check TIF_SINGLESTEP for singlestepping check and
  * PT_PTRACED vs TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE for syscall tracing check
  */
 int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@  void syscall_trace_leave(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	audit_syscall_exit(regs);
 
 	/* Fake a debug trap */
-	if (ptraced & PT_DTRACE)
+	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
 		send_sigtrap(&regs->regs, 0);
 
 	if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE))
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/signal.c b/arch/um/kernel/signal.c
index 88cd9b5c1b74..ae4658f576ab 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/signal.c
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@  static void handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	unsigned long sp;
 	int err;
 
-	if ((current->ptrace & PT_DTRACE) && (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED))
+	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP) && (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED))
 		singlestep = 1;
 
 	/* Did we come from a system call? */
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@  void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 * on the host.  The tracing thread will check this flag and
 	 * PTRACE_SYSCALL if necessary.
 	 */
-	if (current->ptrace & PT_DTRACE)
+	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP))
 		current->thread.singlestep_syscall =
 			is_syscall(PT_REGS_IP(&current->thread.regs));
 
diff --git a/include/linux/ptrace.h b/include/linux/ptrace.h
index 15b3d176b6b4..4c06f9f8ef3f 100644
--- a/include/linux/ptrace.h
+++ b/include/linux/ptrace.h
@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@  extern int ptrace_access_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr,
 
 #define PT_SEIZED	0x00010000	/* SEIZE used, enable new behavior */
 #define PT_PTRACED	0x00000001
-#define PT_DTRACE	0x00000002	/* delayed trace (used on m68k, i386) */
 
 #define PT_OPT_FLAG_SHIFT	3
 /* PT_TRACE_* event enable flags */