Message ID | 20220420090214.2588618-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | wl12xx: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync | expand |
cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote: > From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> > > Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and > pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no > actual functional changes. > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> > Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> Patch applied to wireless-next.git, thanks. 54d5ecc1710e wl12xx: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c index e20e18cd04ae..7bd3ce2f0804 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c @@ -855,11 +855,9 @@ void wl1271_tx_work(struct work_struct *work) int ret; mutex_lock(&wl->mutex); - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev); - if (ret < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev); + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev); + if (ret < 0) goto out; - } ret = wlcore_tx_work_locked(wl); if (ret < 0) {