Message ID | 20220413093431.2538254-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | wlcore: sysfs: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync() | expand |
cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote: > From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> > > Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate > for simplifing code > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> > Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> Patch applied to wireless-next.git, thanks. da8e909c99e4 wlcore: sysfs: use pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead of pm_runtime_get_sync()
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sysfs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sysfs.c index 35b535c125b6..f0c7e09b314d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sysfs.c @@ -56,11 +56,9 @@ static ssize_t bt_coex_state_store(struct device *dev, if (unlikely(wl->state != WLCORE_STATE_ON)) goto out; - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(wl->dev); - if (ret < 0) { - pm_runtime_put_noidle(wl->dev); + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(wl->dev); + if (ret < 0) goto out; - } wl1271_acx_sg_enable(wl, wl->sg_enabled); pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(wl->dev);