Message ID | 20220413060729.27639-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Refactor Ralink Pinctrl and Add Documentation | expand |
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 8:08 AM Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> wrote: > This patch series brings complete refactoring to the Ralink pinctrl driver > and its subdrivers. I just merged all the patches, the comments seem minor and any further fixes can certainly be done on top of this. Anyone interested in ralink working nicely is likely in the thread and we mostly care about that this works for OpenWrt, and if it works for them we are happy. > mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: use the new compatible string for MT7621 pinctrl This was a bit scary since we usually take these through the respective SoC tree, but I just applied it anyway, it makes logical sense in the series. I hope it will not lead to conflicts. Good work with this series! My personal headache with RT2880 is the Ralink RT2880F mini PCI card which apparently contains a non-reflashable firmware. It's not the RT2880:s fault though, I'm just always reminded of this when working with RT2880 :/ Yours, Linus Walleij
On 21/04/2022 17:27, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 8:08 AM Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> wrote: > >> This patch series brings complete refactoring to the Ralink pinctrl driver >> and its subdrivers. > > I just merged all the patches, the comments seem minor and any further > fixes can certainly be done on top of this. Anyone interested in ralink > working nicely is likely in the thread and we mostly care about that this > works for OpenWrt, and if it works for them we are happy. > >> mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: use the new compatible string for MT7621 pinctrl > > This was a bit scary since we usually take these through the respective > SoC tree, but I just applied it anyway, it makes logical sense in the > series. > > I hope it will not lead to conflicts. > > Good work with this series! Thanks. There is a v2 of this series which has been waiting for a week, I hope that was the one you applied as you replied under v1 (I'm not sure which repository you applied this so I can't check myself). https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=632370 Arınç
On 22/04/2022 08:21, Sergio Paracuellos wrote: > Hi Arinç, > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 4:44 PM Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> wrote: >> >> On 21/04/2022 17:27, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 8:08 AM Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> wrote: >>> >>>> This patch series brings complete refactoring to the Ralink pinctrl driver >>>> and its subdrivers. >>> >>> I just merged all the patches, the comments seem minor and any further >>> fixes can certainly be done on top of this. Anyone interested in ralink >>> working nicely is likely in the thread and we mostly care about that this >>> works for OpenWrt, and if it works for them we are happy. >>> >>>> mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: use the new compatible string for MT7621 pinctrl >>> >>> This was a bit scary since we usually take these through the respective >>> SoC tree, but I just applied it anyway, it makes logical sense in the >>> series. >>> >>> I hope it will not lead to conflicts. >>> >>> Good work with this series! >> >> Thanks. There is a v2 of this series which has been waiting for a week, >> I hope that was the one you applied as you replied under v1 (I'm not >> sure which repository you applied this so I can't check myself). > > Linus adds patches through the linux-pinctrl tree as pinctrl maintainer. Check: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=devel Thanks Sergio. I see v1 was applied, oops. What to do? Arınç
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 8:14 AM Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@arinc9.com> wrote: > >> Thanks. There is a v2 of this series which has been waiting for a week, > >> I hope that was the one you applied as you replied under v1 (I'm not > >> sure which repository you applied this so I can't check myself). > > > > Linus adds patches through the linux-pinctrl tree as pinctrl maintainer. Check: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=devel > > Thanks Sergio. I see v1 was applied, oops. What to do? No problem, I backed it out (had to back out some stuff pulled on top too...) then re-pulled the stuff I pulled on top, then applied v2 on top. Let's see how much I screwed up :D Yours, Linus Walleij