mbox series

[v3,0/4] Add support for the eDP panel on sc7280 CRD

Message ID 1644396932-17932-1-git-send-email-quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com
Headers show
Series Add support for the eDP panel on sc7280 CRD | expand

Message

Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC) Feb. 9, 2022, 8:55 a.m. UTC
Add support for the eDP panel on sc7280 CRD platform. The eDP panel does
not need HPD line for connect disconnect. So, this series will report eDP
as always connected. The driver needs to register for IRQ_HPD only for eDP.
This support will be added later.

These changes are dependent on the following series:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=586263&archive=both&state=*
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=560587&state=%2A&archive=both


Sankeerth Billakanti (4):
  dt-bindings: display: simple: Add sharp LQ140M1JW46 panel
  arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add support for eDP panel on CRD
  drm/panel-edp: Add eDP sharp panel support
  drm/msm/dp: Add driver support to utilize drm panel

 .../bindings/display/panel/panel-simple.yaml       |   2 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-crd.dts            | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi               |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c                |   8 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c                    |  54 ++++++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.h                 |   3 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c                  |  31 ++++++
 7 files changed, 216 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Stephen Boyd Feb. 10, 2022, 1:22 a.m. UTC | #1
Quoting Sankeerth Billakanti (2022-02-09 00:55:32)
> Add support in the DP driver to utilize the custom eDP panels
> from drm/panels.
>
> An eDP panel is always connected to the platform. So, the eDP
> connector can be reported as always connected. The display mode
> will be sourced from the panel. The panel mode will be set after
> the link training is completed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
>   None
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c |  8 ++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c     | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.h  |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> index 7cc4d21..410fda4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> @@ -1513,6 +1513,10 @@ int msm_dp_display_enable(struct msm_dp *dp, struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }
>
> +       /* handle eDP on */

This comment is obvious. Please remove.

> +       if (dp->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
> +               dp_hpd_plug_handle(dp_display, 0);
> +
>         mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>
>         /* stop sentinel checking */
> @@ -1577,6 +1581,10 @@ int msm_dp_display_disable(struct msm_dp *dp, struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>
>         dp_display = container_of(dp, struct dp_display_private, dp_display);
>
> +       /* handle edp off */

This comment is obvious. Please remove.

> +       if (dp->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
> +               dp_hpd_unplug_handle(dp_display, 0);
> +
>         mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>
>         /* stop sentinel checking */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> index d4d360d..12fa8c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ static enum drm_connector_status dp_connector_detect(struct drm_connector *conn,
>
>         dp = to_dp_connector(conn)->dp_display;
>
> +       /* eDP is always  connected */
> +       if (dp->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
> +               return connector_status_connected;

Why not implement different connector ops for eDP and then not implement
this function at all in that case?

> +
>         DRM_DEBUG_DP("is_connected = %s\n",
>                 (dp->is_connected) ? "true" : "false");
>
> @@ -123,6 +127,35 @@ static enum drm_mode_status dp_connector_mode_valid(
>         return dp_display_validate_mode(dp_disp, mode->clock);
>  }
>
> +static int edp_connector_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
> +{
> +       struct msm_dp *dp;
> +
> +       if (!connector)

Is this check really necessary? Why doesn't drm do it in higher layers?

> +               return 0;
> +
> +       dp = to_dp_connector(connector)->dp_display;
> +
> +       return drm_bridge_get_modes(dp->panel_bridge, connector);
> +}
> +
> +static enum drm_mode_status edp_connector_mode_valid(
> +               struct drm_connector *connector,
> +               struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> +{
> +       struct msm_dp *dp;
> +
> +       if (!connector)

Is this check really necessary? Why doesn't drm do it in higher layers?

> +               return 0;
> +
> +       dp = to_dp_connector(connector)->dp_display;
> +
> +       if (mode->clock > EDP_MAX_PIXEL_CLK_KHZ)
> +               return MODE_BAD;

Why not return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH?

> +
> +       return MODE_OK;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct drm_connector_funcs dp_connector_funcs = {
>         .detect = dp_connector_detect,
>         .fill_modes = drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes,
> @@ -137,6 +170,12 @@ static const struct drm_connector_helper_funcs dp_connector_helper_funcs = {
>         .mode_valid = dp_connector_mode_valid,
>  };
>
> +static const struct drm_connector_helper_funcs edp_connector_helper_funcs = {
> +       .get_modes = edp_connector_get_modes,
> +       .mode_valid = edp_connector_mode_valid,
> +

Why the extra newline?

> +};
> +
>  /* connector initialization */
>  struct drm_connector *dp_drm_connector_init(struct msm_dp *dp_display)
>  {
> @@ -160,12 +199,17 @@ struct drm_connector *dp_drm_connector_init(struct msm_dp *dp_display)
>         if (ret)
>                 return ERR_PTR(ret);
>
> -       drm_connector_helper_add(connector, &dp_connector_helper_funcs);
> +       if (dp_display->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP) {
> +               drm_connector_helper_add(connector,
> +                               &edp_connector_helper_funcs);
> +       } else {
> +               drm_connector_helper_add(connector, &dp_connector_helper_funcs);
>
> -       /*
> -        * Enable HPD to let hpd event is handled when cable is connected.
> -        */
> -       connector->polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_HPD;
> +               /*
> +                * Enable HPD to let hpd event is handled when cable is connected.
> +                */
> +               connector->polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_HPD;
> +       }
>
>         drm_connector_attach_encoder(connector, dp_display->encoder);
>
Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC) Feb. 10, 2022, 11:57 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Stephen,
Will make the changes.

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> 
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2022 6:52 AM
To: Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC) <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com>; agross@kernel.org; airlied@linux.ie; bjorn.andersson@linaro.org; daniel@ffwll.ch; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; dianders@chromium.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org; krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com; linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; robdclark@gmail.com; robh+dt@kernel.org; sam@ravnborg.org; seanpaul@chromium.org; thierry.reding@gmail.com
Cc: quic_kalyant <quic_kalyant@quicinc.com>; Abhinav Kumar (QUIC) <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>; Kuogee Hsieh (QUIC) <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>; quic_mkrishn <quic_mkrishn@quicinc.com>; quic_vproddut <quic_vproddut@quicinc.com>; dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/msm/dp: Add driver support to utilize drm panel

Quoting Sankeerth Billakanti (2022-02-09 00:55:32)
> Add support in the DP driver to utilize the custom eDP panels from 
> drm/panels.
>
> An eDP panel is always connected to the platform. So, the eDP 
> connector can be reported as always connected. The display mode will 
> be sourced from the panel. The panel mode will be set after the link 
> training is completed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
>   None
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c |  8 ++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c     | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_parser.h  |  3 +++
>  3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> index 7cc4d21..410fda4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
> @@ -1513,6 +1513,10 @@ int msm_dp_display_enable(struct msm_dp *dp, struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }
>
> +       /* handle eDP on */

This comment is obvious. Please remove.

> +       if (dp->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
> +               dp_hpd_plug_handle(dp_display, 0);
> +
>         mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>
>         /* stop sentinel checking */
> @@ -1577,6 +1581,10 @@ int msm_dp_display_disable(struct msm_dp *dp, 
> struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>
>         dp_display = container_of(dp, struct dp_display_private, 
> dp_display);
>
> +       /* handle edp off */

This comment is obvious. Please remove.

> +       if (dp->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
> +               dp_hpd_unplug_handle(dp_display, 0);
> +
>         mutex_lock(&dp_display->event_mutex);
>
>         /* stop sentinel checking */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c index d4d360d..12fa8c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ static enum drm_connector_status 
> dp_connector_detect(struct drm_connector *conn,
>
>         dp = to_dp_connector(conn)->dp_display;
>
> +       /* eDP is always  connected */
> +       if (dp->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
> +               return connector_status_connected;

Why not implement different connector ops for eDP and then not implement this function at all in that case?

> +
>         DRM_DEBUG_DP("is_connected = %s\n",
>                 (dp->is_connected) ? "true" : "false");
>
> @@ -123,6 +127,35 @@ static enum drm_mode_status dp_connector_mode_valid(
>         return dp_display_validate_mode(dp_disp, mode->clock);  }
>
> +static int edp_connector_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector) {
> +       struct msm_dp *dp;
> +
> +       if (!connector)

Is this check really necessary? Why doesn't drm do it in higher layers?

> +               return 0;
> +
> +       dp = to_dp_connector(connector)->dp_display;
> +
> +       return drm_bridge_get_modes(dp->panel_bridge, connector); }
> +
> +static enum drm_mode_status edp_connector_mode_valid(
> +               struct drm_connector *connector,
> +               struct drm_display_mode *mode) {
> +       struct msm_dp *dp;
> +
> +       if (!connector)

Is this check really necessary? Why doesn't drm do it in higher layers?

> +               return 0;
> +
> +       dp = to_dp_connector(connector)->dp_display;
> +
> +       if (mode->clock > EDP_MAX_PIXEL_CLK_KHZ)
> +               return MODE_BAD;

Why not return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH?

> +
> +       return MODE_OK;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct drm_connector_funcs dp_connector_funcs = {
>         .detect = dp_connector_detect,
>         .fill_modes = drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes,
> @@ -137,6 +170,12 @@ static const struct drm_connector_helper_funcs dp_connector_helper_funcs = {
>         .mode_valid = dp_connector_mode_valid,  };
>
> +static const struct drm_connector_helper_funcs edp_connector_helper_funcs = {
> +       .get_modes = edp_connector_get_modes,
> +       .mode_valid = edp_connector_mode_valid,
> +

Why the extra newline?

> +};
> +
>  /* connector initialization */
>  struct drm_connector *dp_drm_connector_init(struct msm_dp 
> *dp_display)  { @@ -160,12 +199,17 @@ struct drm_connector 
> *dp_drm_connector_init(struct msm_dp *dp_display)
>         if (ret)
>                 return ERR_PTR(ret);
>
> -       drm_connector_helper_add(connector, &dp_connector_helper_funcs);
> +       if (dp_display->connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP) {
> +               drm_connector_helper_add(connector,
> +                               &edp_connector_helper_funcs);
> +       } else {
> +               drm_connector_helper_add(connector, 
> + &dp_connector_helper_funcs);
>
> -       /*
> -        * Enable HPD to let hpd event is handled when cable is connected.
> -        */
> -       connector->polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_HPD;
> +               /*
> +                * Enable HPD to let hpd event is handled when cable is connected.
> +                */
> +               connector->polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_HPD;
> +       }
>
>         drm_connector_attach_encoder(connector, dp_display->encoder);
>