[v2] scsi: pm8001: Fix phys_to_virt() usage on dma_addr_t

The driver supports a "direct" mode of operation, where the SMP req frame
is directly copied into the command payload (and vice-versa for the SMP
resp).

To get at the SMP req frame data in the scatterlist the driver uses
phys_to_virt() on the DMA mapped memory dma_addr_t . This is broken,
and subsequently crashes as follows when an IOMMU is enabled:

 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
ffff0000fcebfb00
	...
 pc : pm80xx_chip_smp_req+0x2d0/0x3d0
 lr : pm80xx_chip_smp_req+0xac/0x3d0
 pm80xx_chip_smp_req+0x2d0/0x3d0
 pm8001_task_exec.constprop.0+0x368/0x520
 pm8001_queue_command+0x1c/0x30
 smp_execute_task_sg+0xdc/0x204
 sas_discover_expander.part.0+0xac/0x6cc
 sas_discover_root_expander+0x8c/0x150
 sas_discover_domain+0x3ac/0x6a0
 process_one_work+0x1d0/0x354
 worker_thread+0x13c/0x470
 kthread+0x17c/0x190
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
 Code: 371806e1 910006d6 6b16033f 54000249 (38766b05)
 ---[ end trace b91d59aaee98ea2d ]---
note: kworker/u192:0[7] exited with preempt_count 1

Instead use kmap_atomic().

Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
---
Difference to v1:
- use kmap_atomic() in both locations

On 2021/12/11 2:51, John Garry wrote:
> The driver supports a "direct" mode of operation, where the SMP req frame
> is directly copied into the command payload (and vice-versa for the SMP
> resp).
> 
> To get at the SMP req frame data in the scatterlist the driver uses
> phys_to_virt() on the DMA mapped memory dma_addr_t . This is broken,
> and subsequently crashes as follows when an IOMMU is enabled:
> 
>  Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address
> ffff0000fcebfb00
> 	...
>  pc : pm80xx_chip_smp_req+0x2d0/0x3d0
>  lr : pm80xx_chip_smp_req+0xac/0x3d0
>  pm80xx_chip_smp_req+0x2d0/0x3d0
>  pm8001_task_exec.constprop.0+0x368/0x520
>  pm8001_queue_command+0x1c/0x30
>  smp_execute_task_sg+0xdc/0x204
>  sas_discover_expander.part.0+0xac/0x6cc
>  sas_discover_root_expander+0x8c/0x150
>  sas_discover_domain+0x3ac/0x6a0
>  process_one_work+0x1d0/0x354
>  worker_thread+0x13c/0x470
>  kthread+0x17c/0x190
>  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>  Code: 371806e1 910006d6 6b16033f 54000249 (38766b05)
>  ---[ end trace b91d59aaee98ea2d ]---
> note: kworker/u192:0[7] exited with preempt_count 1
> 
> Instead use kmap_atomic().
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> ---
> Difference to v1:
> - use kmap_atomic() in both locations
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> index b9f6d83ff380..bed4ab071de5 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> @@ -3053,7 +3053,6 @@ mpi_smp_completion(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, void *piomb)
>  	struct smp_completion_resp *psmpPayload;
>  	struct task_status_struct *ts;
>  	struct pm8001_device *pm8001_dev;
> -	char *pdma_respaddr = NULL;
>  
>  	psmpPayload = (struct smp_completion_resp *)(piomb + 4);
>  	status = le32_to_cpu(psmpPayload->status);
> @@ -3080,19 +3079,23 @@ mpi_smp_completion(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, void *piomb)
>  		if (pm8001_dev)
>  			atomic_dec(&pm8001_dev->running_req);
>  		if (pm8001_ha->smp_exp_mode == SMP_DIRECT) {
> +			struct scatterlist *sg_resp = &t->smp_task.smp_resp;
> +			u8 *payload;
> +			void *to;
> +
>  			pm8001_dbg(pm8001_ha, IO,
>  				   "DIRECT RESPONSE Length:%d\n",
>  				   param);
> -			pdma_respaddr = (char *)(phys_to_virt(cpu_to_le64
> -						((u64)sg_dma_address
> -						(&t->smp_task.smp_resp))));
> +			to = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg_resp));
> +			payload = to + sg_resp->offset;
>  			for (i = 0; i < param; i++) {
> -				*(pdma_respaddr+i) = psmpPayload->_r_a[i];
> +				*(payload + i) = psmpPayload->_r_a[i];
>  				pm8001_dbg(pm8001_ha, IO,
>  					   "SMP Byte%d DMA data 0x%x psmp 0x%x\n",
> -					   i, *(pdma_respaddr + i),
> +					   i, *(payload + i),
>  					   psmpPayload->_r_a[i]);
>  			}
> +			kunmap_atomic(to);
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	case IO_ABORTED:
> @@ -4236,14 +4239,14 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_smp_req(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>  	struct sas_task *task = ccb->task;
>  	struct domain_device *dev = task->dev;
>  	struct pm8001_device *pm8001_dev = dev->lldd_dev;
> -	struct scatterlist *sg_req, *sg_resp;
> +	struct scatterlist *sg_req, *sg_resp, *smp_req;
>  	u32 req_len, resp_len;
>  	struct smp_req smp_cmd;
>  	u32 opc;
>  	struct inbound_queue_table *circularQ;
> -	char *preq_dma_addr = NULL;
> -	__le64 tmp_addr;
>  	u32 i, length;
> +	u8 *payload;
> +	u8 *to;
>  
>  	memset(&smp_cmd, 0, sizeof(smp_cmd));
>  	/*
> @@ -4280,8 +4283,9 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_smp_req(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>  		pm8001_ha->smp_exp_mode = SMP_INDIRECT;
>  
>  
> -	tmp_addr = cpu_to_le64((u64)sg_dma_address(&task->smp_task.smp_req));
> -	preq_dma_addr = (char *)phys_to_virt(tmp_addr);
> +	smp_req = &task->smp_task.smp_req;
> +	to = kmap_atomic(sg_page(smp_req));
> +	payload = to + smp_req->offset;
>  
>  	/* INDIRECT MODE command settings. Use DMA */
>  	if (pm8001_ha->smp_exp_mode == SMP_INDIRECT) {
> @@ -4289,7 +4293,7 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_smp_req(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>  		/* for SPCv indirect mode. Place the top 4 bytes of
>  		 * SMP Request header here. */
>  		for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> -			smp_cmd.smp_req16[i] = *(preq_dma_addr + i);
> +			smp_cmd.smp_req16[i] = *(payload + i);
>  		/* exclude top 4 bytes for SMP req header */
>  		smp_cmd.long_smp_req.long_req_addr =
>  			cpu_to_le64((u64)sg_dma_address
> @@ -4320,20 +4324,20 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_smp_req(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>  		pm8001_dbg(pm8001_ha, IO, "SMP REQUEST DIRECT MODE\n");
>  		for (i = 0; i < length; i++)
>  			if (i < 16) {
> -				smp_cmd.smp_req16[i] = *(preq_dma_addr+i);
> +				smp_cmd.smp_req16[i] = *(payload+i);

Maybe add spacs around the "+" as you did above ?

>  				pm8001_dbg(pm8001_ha, IO,
>  					   "Byte[%d]:%x (DMA data:%x)\n",
>  					   i, smp_cmd.smp_req16[i],
> -					   *(preq_dma_addr));
> +					   *(payload));
>  			} else {
> -				smp_cmd.smp_req[i] = *(preq_dma_addr+i);
> +				smp_cmd.smp_req[i] = *(payload+i);

same comment

>  				pm8001_dbg(pm8001_ha, IO,
>  					   "Byte[%d]:%x (DMA data:%x)\n",
>  					   i, smp_cmd.smp_req[i],
> -					   *(preq_dma_addr));
> +					   *(payload));
>  			}
>  	}
> -
> +	kunmap_atomic(to);
>  	build_smp_cmd(pm8001_dev->device_id, smp_cmd.tag,
>  				&smp_cmd, pm8001_ha->smp_exp_mode, length);
>  	rc = pm8001_mpi_build_cmd(pm8001_ha, circularQ, opc, &smp_cmd,

Otherwise, looks OK to me.

On 11/12/2021 00:26, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> ss
>> @@ -4320,20 +4324,20 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_smp_req(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>>   		pm8001_dbg(pm8001_ha, IO, "SMP REQUEST DIRECT MODE\n");
>>   		for (i = 0; i < length; i++)
>>   			if (i < 16) {
>> -				smp_cmd.smp_req16[i] = *(preq_dma_addr+i);
>> +				smp_cmd.smp_req16[i] = *(payload+i);
> Maybe add spacs around the "+" as you did above ?

Yeah, right. I noticed now that only strict mode of checkpatch picks up 
on this.

> 
>>   				pm8001_dbg(pm8001_ha, IO,
>>   					   "Byte[%d]:%x (DMA data:%x)\n",
>>   					   i, smp_cmd.smp_req16[i],

...

>>   	}
>> -
>> +	kunmap_atomic(to);
>>   	build_smp_cmd(pm8001_dev->device_id, smp_cmd.tag,
>>   				&smp_cmd, pm8001_ha->smp_exp_mode, length);
>>   	rc = pm8001_mpi_build_cmd(pm8001_ha, circularQ, opc, &smp_cmd,
> Otherwise, looks OK to me.

cheers